1st May 2012

Super policy: back-to-front and inside out

FONT SIZE: A+ A-

Changes to the current superannuation policy are due to take effect on 1 July 2012, but have the Government got it right? Richard Shermon doesn’t think so, do you agree?

We will all have experienced as a child our parents at one time or another letting us know that we were wearing our sweater either back-to-front or inside out and sometimes both! However, we don’t expect our political leaders to get their policies both back-to-front and inside out, but when it comes to the possible superannuation changes that have been leaked, it looks like they have.

Yet again the government of the day can’t resist making changes to the superannuation rules to generate a short term gain and give little regard to the longer term consequences. It is my view that by increasing the tax rate super funds apply to concessional contributions from 15 per cent to 30 per cent for high income earners will have the unintended consequence of further undermining confidence in superannuation as a way for saving for retirement. This will result in fewer self funded retirees in the future and therefore more people relying on the public purse to fund their living expenses in retirement. Couple this with the long term trend of improved longevity and future governments will have no choice but to increase further the retirement age (as they are in the UK), tighten further the means test and reduce the actual value of the Age Pension in real terms. I have many clients who already do not make the most of the existing superannuation tax concessions for the very reason that successive governments keep meddling with the system and they therefore instil a lack of confidence in using super as their preferred retirement planning vehicle.

Another change expected to be introduced from July is a reduction in the concessional contribution limit for people aged over 50 from $50,000 to $25,000, unless they have less than $500,000 in their superannuation. This is yet again a back-to-front policy. At the very time when, with hopefully the mortgage paid off and the kids having left home, people have finally some disposable income that they could save for their retirement, the concessional limit is being halved. I am afraid this will also lead to less self-funded retirees and more pressure on the public purse in years to come.

If the Government really wants to move into surplus next year (and I am not convinced that this is sensible economic policy either given the state of the economy) then surely it makes more sense to increase direct income tax rates for the wealthy, or increase GST, rather than further undermine the superannuation system. Alternatively, it should look at reducing government spending by removing some of the inefficient tax rebates and offsets that are in place, such as the health insurance rebate on Extras policies for example.

Richard Shermon, Reserve Financial Consulting

www.reservefc.com.au





COMMENTS

To make a comment, please register or login
Histoman
1st May 2012
8:09pm
GST. I remember when VAT ( UK's GST ) came in in the Uk, and it started at 10%. It is now 17%. Can you imagine wht it will do to those people who are struggling now to pay their power bills and phone bills, that attract teh GST. If it went up by 2,5%, (god forbid ) there would be a lot of cold houses this winter, not only pensioner ones.The government can offset the increase by cutting back on overseas aid, stop throwing billions around like we are flush with dollars. Not all of the money gets where it is supposed to anyway. Germany, that has a population four times ours, sends far less overseas than we do. So what are we trying to prove? ! Last year we provided $4.3 billion in overseas aid, and the government wants to increase this to $8-9 billion by 2015-16. How ridiculous.Wayne needs to do the maths and think this through while he is still there, though he may think, with the current political climate, what's the point now.
Aloysius
2nd May 2012
10:14am
If the Government wants to save money it should stop wasting it. Funding overseas civil warfare is ridiculous when it is irrelevant to our security. Departments such as Climate Change and those that duplicate State Government departments are wasteful and should be rationalised. Increasing the GST would be a dampener on the economy and ill-advised. Removing health insurance rebates would be counter-productive as people would move tro the public system or let their health decline with consequential extra cost later.
Bluebell
4th May 2012
11:46am
I know this isn't related to the aticle above, but does anybody know when the next SA Government budget is being released ???


Join YOURLifeChoices, it’s free

  • Receive our daily enewsletter
  • Enter competitions
  • Comment on articles

you might also be interested in...

The ten worst retirement planning mistakes

The ten worst retirement planning mistakes

Paul Clitheroe reviews the ten biggest retirement planning mistakes – and why you need to avoid them.

Learn from others mistakes

Low income energy rebate increase

Low income energy rebate increase

From 1 July 2011, the Low Income Household Rebate replaced the Energy rebate, and is paid at the rate of $200 per annum.

Are you eligible?

Save your superannuation

Save your superannuation

Australians on average having four super accounts, this can be a large proportion of your retirement income. Now is the time to consider consolidating your superannuation.

Save on fees

Money milestones

Money milestones

Managing your money doesn’t get any easier as you get older, but there are certain money milestones of which you can take advantage.

Money milestones

What to ask a financial adviser

What to ask a financial adviser

Starting on the right foot with a financial advisor can help ensure you get the most from your meeting. YOURLifeChoices has 50 useful questions you may wish to ask.

50 useful questions