Shorten a goner

Mar 27 2015 at 11:11 AM
Fairfax Financial Review
by Rowan Dean

The world of politics was rocked to its core this week following another wild outbreak of leadership speculation and unrest that has shaken the corridors of Canberra to their foundations.

"This has been simmering away in the background for months now," said one unnamed insider from within the highest echelons of the parliamentary party, "but now the lid's blown right off it! The dam has burst! Kapow! Everybody's had it up to here with the endless stupidity, the ridiculously clumsy speech patterns and the hopeless, woeful leadership. But above all, it's the opinion polls. Last week's was a disaster. That was the final straw. He'll be gone by next week."

The insider was of course referring to the doomed leadership of Bill Shorten, with whispers rife throughout the Labor Party that even members of his own frontbench no longer believe he can win the next election. "It should have been a shoo-in," one disgruntled frontbencher, who agreed to speak on strict condition of anonymity, said. "We had the next election in the bag. But then Bill goes and completely stuffs it up! Three little words! That's all it took!"

The frontbencher was referring to what is now widely accepted as Bill Shorten's most spectacular gaffe – his Australia Day "captain's call" that 2015 was to be his "year of ideas".

"How can it be his year of ideas when he doesn't have any?" said another exasperated senior member of the party, speaking through a close friend of an anonymous source. "And on the very day that all anybody wants to do is get blotto in front of the barbie. The last thing anyone wants is an idea. Talk about hopeless timing."

Others were blunter in their assessment. "The problem with ideas is that people think about them," a rebel backbencher said. "And if people start thinking about the return to Labor then obviously we're doomed."

Well-placed sources within the commentariat were quick to agree. "If you say you've got an idea, then there's always the risk that people might take you at your word and ask you what it is. Imagine if Annastacia Palawotsit had tried to pretend she knew what she was doing! We'd have been toast."

WOEFUL INTERVIEW

Critics point to Mr Shorten's woeful Jon Faine interview as the moment that galvanised the backbench to act, although others point to an earlier interview on 7.30 with Leigh Sales as when the mood in the party room turned savagely against Mr Shorten.

"He got all the way through the Sales interview without saying a single thing, which was fantastic, and that is of course his job," another disgruntled backbencher said, "but then with two stupid words he went and blew the whole thing completely! 'Inclusive growth'. What a disaster. Now people will start to think we know how to manage the economy!"

Others mentioned the profound unease within the party over Mr Shorten's continued use of the word "values". "He keeps on banging on about 'Labor values' but of course as everyone knows, the only thing we value is getting back into power as fast as we can so we can get our hands on the loot and start dishing it out to dead people, public servants and paying off those union credit cards."

Rumours have it that there are at least three leadership contenders ready to declare their hand, although who will make the first move is unknown as yet.

"Tanya's gagging for it," one senior source known to be close to the charismatic deputy leader said. "She is so articulate and she knows how get our message across, which is of course that we won't be bringing in a carbon tax on day one, and we won't be immediately hiking the price of it straight up to $150 a tonne because the planet deserves nothing less."

But others believe that the former leader Chris Bowen is the obvious choice to challenge. "Chris's talents are completely wasted in the Treasury portfolio swatting up on tax thresholds. What a joke. Everybody knows Treasury is where you stick hopeless losers like that Springsteen dude."

However, most experts believe that the successful challenge will come from Shorten's former leadership rival Anthony Albanese. One source, who is said to be extremely close to the firebrand from Grayndler, said Albanese was the leader the public craves.

"Anthony is completely wasted just sitting around waiting for Bill to mispronounce the word 'with', which he does with alarming alacrity," the anonymous source said. "It's high time the entire party got behind the one individual smart, talented and popular enough to win the next election. And that is me, er, I mean, him."

12 comments

For all those , who want to understand Aussie humor . In the vein of The Harold Holt Swimming Pool memorial,,,

Pete i àm starting to get the impression that you  are anti labor with these long boring copy pastes

Image result for copy and paste comments

Hi Gerry , no I am not anti Labor , glad you readthe humorist    post . Gives you something to read in ossypiddle ..

I see where Tanya is calling on her party (while she is acting PM) to "compel" her party to vote for same sex marriage.

Good luck with that Tanya. ! There are many in the party who are against it and will cross the floor (so they say).

Re Bill Shorten;  I have said before that he will not lead Labor at the next election...I still stand by that.  Cannot think of anyone who has a chance other than Albanese.

I well remember Bill when asked about a comment by Julia Gillard (which he had not heard) "whatever she said I agree with".   What a stupid thing to say.

Radish

The bookies would give you better odds on Abbott not staying leader. By " compel " I take it you mean have it as Labor policy. It is my understanding that same sex marriage is a Labor policy but it is a concience vote for members in parliament. The coalition has a no as its policy and they adhere to it. Which brings me to the I agree with that by Shorten. How many ditched policies by Abbott were strongly advocated by coalition memebers but are now no longer supported in public ? Not a stupid thing to say at all as thats what parties do, go along with party policy. Think the Medicare co payment and you have the very thing you are talking about. All lock step in agreement in public but now its off the table. Just ask unsustainable Dutton.

Acting Labor Leader Tanya Plibersek is leading a push to axe the conscience vote on same-sex marriage for MPs and senators,.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-27/push-to-axe-labor-larty-conscience-vote-on-same-sex-marriage/6423946

Liberal Democrat David Leyonhjelm is poised to introduce his long-awaited same-sex marriage bill to the Senate, in a move that will increase the pressure on the Liberal Party to allow its MPs a conscience vote on the issue.

Senator Leyonhjelm is due to introduce his Freedom to Marry Bill to the upper house on Wednesday afternoon, which would allow gay, transgender and intersex people to marry.

He will flag his plans in a speech to the Senate on Tuesday evening.


The Libertarian senator has previously argued he would not introduce his bill until it had a good chance of success. Last month, he decided to delay the bill's introduction after advice from MPs about timing.

But after a recent dinner with Prime Minister Tony Abbott,the LDP senator changed his mind.

"As a result of my discussion during that dinner I decided there was nothing for me to achieve by delaying it," Senator Leyonhjelm said.

Mr Abbott has previously said the Liberals' position on same-sex marriage would be a question for the post-2013 election party room. The party room requires a bill to be before the Parliament to prompt debate on the issue.

Liberal sources said there is only a small political window in which to get same-sex marriage on the party's parliamentary agenda – given that MPs had not wanted to raise the issue in the first year after the election and would not want it being swamped by the build up to the next federal election.

Marriage equality advocates, who have been lobbying Coalition MPs in their home electorates since early this year, believe they have the support of up to 70 per cent of the party room for a conscience vote.

In the more general question of federal MPs crossing the floor . It is allowed by the Liberal party but not by the Labor party...

Never underestimate Labor's capacity for self-destruction.

Two weeks out from the federal budget, ahead in the polls, on the front foot over policy and deputy Leader Tanya Plibersek decides its time to start the brawl over gay marriage.


She argued on Monday that gay marriage is not a life and death issue like abortion or euthanasia and, therefore, should be subject to a binding vote.


But, fthe issue is far more difficult for many of her colleagues.

First, some from the Right faction oppose gay marriage on religious grounds. Even though no-one is asking churches to conduct same-sex marriages, there continues to be a strong opposition from the religious Right.

So passionate are the views in the Right that people were pre-selected by their faction to try and defeat gay marriage. The most spectacular case was that of former union leader Paul Howes who sought to replace Bob Carr in the Senate

Howes, a protege of Bill Shorten and member of the right, supported gay marriage but was ambushed by the conservative element of his own faction, that aligned to the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association. He lost the spot to Deb O'Neill, the former lower house MP who lost her NSW central coast seat in 2013.

The faction was prepared to keep out of Parliament someone of the calibre of Howes just to keep gay marriage at bay. That's indicative of the passions the issue creates internally in the

It doesn't make sense to be goading Abbott to allow his MPs a conscience vote while trying to force your side to adopt your own view.

http://www.afr.com/news/politics/gay-marriage-call-easy-for-tanya-plibersek-not-for-labor-20150427-1mty8p?stb=twt

In my opinon there are more pressing problems for government than gay marriage!

Totaly agree Radi personaly I am for giving homosexuals all legal rights to the equivalent of others but feel that marrige should be retained to those of opposite sex,,

The Marriage Act will have to be changed Pete as it cannot, in its present form accommodate two people of the same sex.

I am in agreement with your comments.

SYDNEY federal Labor MP Tanya Plibersek used her speech in the House of Representatives on Tuesday night to encourage Prime Minister Tony Abbott to grant his Coalition MPs a conscience vote on marriage equality as a “present” for the LGBTI community for Mardi Gras.
March 05 2015

Acting Labor leader Tanya Plibersek is leading a push to axe the conscience vote on same-sex marriage for MPs and senators, arguing it is a matter of legal equality.
March 29 2015

Deputy Labor leader Tanya Plibersek has "wrecked" progress within the Liberal Party towards a conscience vote on same-sex marriage, the Liberal Party's first openly gay federal parliamentarian says.

There has been a slow and cautious approach to achieving a conscience vote and she has wrecked that

Dean Smith - a conservative senator from WA who recently revealed he now supports same-sex marriage - said he felt "personally disappointed" by Ms Plibersek's decision to push for a binding Labor vote on the issue at the party's national conference in July.

Labor frontbencher David Feeney has rebuked deputy leader Tanya Plibersek over her push to compel Labor MPs to vote for same-sex marriage, while also lashing ALP colleagues who are "fixated" on the Israel and Palestine issue.

The socially conservative West Australian Labor senator Joe Bullock has also vowed to fight Ms Plibersek's push to bind MPs to support same-sex marriage, rather than allowing a conscience vote as is currently the case.


He would not rule out crossing the floor of the Parliament if a vote was called on the issue, which could lead to his expulsion from the ALP.
SMH

Plibersek’s comments prompted warnings from the conservative Shop Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association that such a decision would result in some Labor parliamentarians crossing the floor to oppose a bill.

Chris Hayes, the Labor MP for Fowler in NSW, said he would contribute to the debate at the national conference but he stood by the views he had previously expressed in the parliament.

Hayes, a member of the right faction, was quoted by Fairfax Media in 2011 as saying he would never vote for gay marriage, even if party policy dictated it. “I can’t apologise for my beliefs,” he said at the time.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/28/labor-push-on-same-sex-marriage-vote-would-strengthen-resolve-of-liberals

I think the issue og Homosexual marriage has the potential to divide the ALP  similar to the DLP split. 

All MPs have the right to cross the floor..But in the ALP case they will be expelled.,,

I find the major parties lack any philosophy'..Just middle of the road survival...

12 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment