13yr old rape victim was condemned to die

WHEN she was gang-raped by four men at the age of 13, her village classed her as a "black virgin" and ordered her killed.

In the rural village of Dadu in southern Pakistan, tradition held that Kainat Soomro's own family should murder her, as her sexual assault had made her a token of disgrace.

Four years later, Kainat is alive and a documentary about her story is premiering on television in the US.

But that doesn't mean she or her family is safe.

As the film Outlawed in Pakistan shows, Kainat Soomro is still "destined to be killed" because she took the step - extraordinary in Pakistan - of fighting for justice.

The village declared her "kari", or a black virgin, and ordered her family to carry out an honor killing to end the shame a rape victim brings to a family, according to Pakistani culture.

The alleged rapists beat her father and one of her brothers. Her older brother went missing for three months and was found murdered.

But Kainat's parents refused to kill their daughter, instead deciding to take up her cause in a legal system which places the burden of proof on the victim.

'Black virgin' condemned to die

 

 

12 comments

And they want to bring Sharia law to Australia.....?

Hugo I,m not sure how you relate sharia to the article . Sharia means law so its like islam sharia or christian sharia . The village may have some form of tradition or coercion but the case went to a civil court . BTW I didn,t know sharia meant law till today . So its like saying ATM machine , machine is a repeat because the M in ATM is machine . Pakistan has a Sharia legal judicial thing alongside its secular judicial system , AFSC or whatever . Sounds dodgy as according to Wiki it doesn,t have enough separation from the executive as in term of of tenure etc .

Who are the they you refer to as wanting sharia in Australia ? Some sections of the muslim community may want it for themselves in cases like divorce etc , domestic . Many faiths have their own form of judges to apply rulings . Some like the Exclusive Brethren don,t need judges they just banish a person they don,t want from seeing or talking to their family .

 Personally I see no reason for any religion to have any sway with the judicial system . Murder is murder and is a crime against a human/humanity not because its a sin .

geomac, I am merely using the commonly used terminology for Islamic Law. Most Islamists seem to refer to their religious law by this term (Sharia Law). I dont believe that there is anything in the Koran instructing its desciples to kill rape victims, but the fanatics in Islam seem able to dredge up passages and "interpret" them to suit their sadistic impulses.

This is not unlike the middle and dark ages, the Spanish Inquisition etc..... Islam does not hold a monopoly on using religion to justify cruel and inhuman practices.

Hugo

Yes same with me and its only today I learned . Makes no difference to what a person means . Your last sentence is very relevant .

I don't know where you got that information from geomac?  Are you saying that Sharia Law means Law Law?  According to a number of sources that I have looked up, as well as a friend, who is a Muslim Sheik, Sharia means the conglomerate, or combination of Islamic Legal beliefs.

Good question innes . I tried to go back through my Safari history but failed to find the page where I read it .

.    sharia - the code of law derived from the Koran and from the teachings and example of Mohammed; "sharia is only applicable to Muslims"; "under Islamic law there is no separation of church and state"

Far too complicated and  mixed cutures does not work no matter what cover or  a pretty picture on it......it only works when the countries of whatever religion want it to work and the answer to that is a hug lump of money for the arms they all buy fighting each other...if they ones in the pot at the moment keep going there will be no Syria left as was before and others coming forward too......we see the mixed marriages here and the little tiny girls from asian places trailing behind the big white chief...lolololol tell me that works only for the money then..................

I have to disagree precious......my wife and I have been married for seven years now and there is about 18 years difference in our ages. She walks beside her "big white chief" (not behind) and has earned her own living since coming to Australia. She is Buddhist and we have never had an argument over religion - hers or mine. She loves Australia and its culture and while she observes her own cultural and religious practices, she also enjoys everything Australian (especially Christmas).

There are certainly many problems with inter-racial marriages or between different cultures, but there are also many success stories.

kfchugo,

Being Buddhist is vastly different from being Muslim. 

My son dated a couple of lovely, well-educated, Muslim women who had been divorced.  He said that being divorced for a Muslim woman was a terrible mark of shame.  Neither would go places where they might bump into people they knew. 

Also a problem - a major problem - was that they didn't want to be seen with a westerner.  Being seen dating a westerner meant that they had adopted western ways, and therefore, the same "decadent and immoral" behavior.

These women would have been marked as not only divorced, but also completely without morals.

I suppose there are such mixed relationships, but I am not aware of them.

I dont think you would like my comments?

I'm sitting this one out,so,go for it,i'm a spectator!

billy

I find this subject very interesting.  I go to China on a very regular basis & am very aware that Chinese women MUCH prefer western husbands, because they are treated much better by western men than by Chinese men.

Under the Iranian Islamic Penal code, little girls as young a 9 yrs old, and boys as young as 14 yrs, are liable for execution.

Many, many Iranians detest every aspect of their Islamic Penal Code, which is riven with horrors.    A couple of years ago, they set up a petition that Iran be expelled from the UN until the country came in line with Human Rights as seen in the west. 

They were obviously not successful.

I spoke to married couple, she Australian, he Iranian. They had a successful business here. The mention of Islam and the husband  went completely off the deep end.  He had been a Muslim, but became an apostate.  He recited a litany of "crimes' committed by its founder, and crimes perpetuated now in the Islam's name.  Certainly, events I was not aware of, indeed most westerners wouldn't be.

Some time later, a man delivered goods to me.  He told me his name, and I remarked that it was Iranian.  This also brought forth a bitter tirade against the Iranian regime and highly critical of  its Islamic foundation.  He had been an asylum seeker.

I have since met other Iranians.  They are certainly independent thinkers.

Could a kind soul tell me how I can start up a topic on this forum?  Perhaps contact me privately.

Twila

When you click on general discussion or hot topics above the list and to the right is new topic , click on that . You will have then have the title/header column ie type in iran refugees then click on box below the header and add comments or a link to an article . If I have not been clear let me know and I will elaborate .

cheers

Thank you, geomac.  What would I do without you.

Regarding inter-racial marriage, some years ago an enquiry was made by the catholic church (yes ... I know) into the many abuses and sometimes unexplained deaths of mail-order brides, so popular then.

Aussies (and undoubtedly others elsewhere) were marrying these women and treating them appallingly. I remember one case which was highlighted on tv.  This very young woman from the Philipines was married to an Aussie about three times her age.  They lived in some remote area.  He abused her till she tried to run away with just the clothes on her back.  She was dragged back and abused again.  Some how this came to the notice of the media.

Whilst some disapprove of mail-order brides, one can't condemn young women from trying to get out of mind-numbing poverty, especially when they have the intention of being good wives to those who marry them.  Australia has a history of bridal imports from earliest days.  And certainly, many would have been very successful.

A problem with mail-order brides is that many men (not all) were unable to find women who would marry them and there was a very good reason why.

We don't seem to hear about this now.  Has it died out.

Think it is still happening Tila but they are internet brides now. Some are quite savvy too if they are mistreated they last out fot 2 years and then go for the benefits associated with divorce and that is maybe what some were after that to begin with. 

Nevertheless some marriages do turn out alright some men are looking for wives with a more traditional outlook towards marriage than many younger australian women have, and in those cases where that is what the women want and expect too, both parties are happy.

vivity,

It is good to know that marriages which have started this way, do work out.

However, it must be difficult for some of  those who stick out abuse for two years, then get divorced. Some of the abuse can be pretty horrific.

Certainly, you could well be right about women who have a deliberate long-term plan to marry (perhaps anybody) and divorce after two years.  I'd be very surpised if this didn't happen.

Heard of a white South African who was warned by family, his, that was why 2 previous wives had left him. She has married him against their advice because she said 2 years then she and her daughter can stay here and not have to go back to SA. So it happens.

12 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment