GP co-payment
Lot of protest about GP co-payment and while I agree that in some cases this payment should be waived, there are others in my opinion who could and should pay up. Too many people attend their doctors' surgeries for seemingly no real reason. Things that can be dealt with by simple home remedies are costing the country a bucket load. To some, it's just another type of 'social visit'. I, should complain because I have private health insurance and I will still have to pay a co-payment, if and when it comes into effect. So I'll be having a double whammy. How is that fair? But as I say, I'm not complaining because I don't front up to my doctor every time my toe hurts. A line has to be drawn somewhere.
From the Crikey grapevine, the latest tips and rumours …
Co-payments and the Cormack Foundation. While debate continues to simmer over the government’s GP co-payment plan, one tipster drew our attention to the idea's source. The original co-payment figure was $6, and it came from the Australian Centre for Health Research (ACHR), a small think tank set up by private health funds and hospitals. It turns out that like many think tanks, the ACHR is not all that far removed from the halls of power. The ACHR board is a who’s-who of head honchos from the private health sector, including Michael Walsh, chief executive of Cabrini Health in Melbourne. Cabrini Health’s chairman is Peter Matthey, who is the financial controller for the Cormack Foundation -- the Liberal Party’s biggest donor for many years. The Cormack Foundation’s influence on government policies has already been questioned this year, with Crikey revealing the foundation receives dividends from the big four banks, which lobbied the government successfully to repeal financial advice regulations.