I hope she has good security measures in place as some would stop at nothing to stop the truth coming out.

In 'The Australian' this morning Graham Richardson is again at pains to denounce my contribution to the Gillard debate as "just part of the lunatic fringe". "No more than a few hundred people see that stuff", he said on Sky. Well, Richo, if that's the case, why bother with the continued attack?
And why are Gillard and Summers still expressing "murderous rage"?
Here's why Richo: The "lunatic fringe" that read my stuff are far greater in number than those who read yours.
My Facebook page has between 100,000 and 200,000 readers per week and Pickering Post has between 80,000 and 100,000, with up to 2,000 comments on each article. Emails go to a further 10,000 recipients and all three mediums go viral.
There is no way to quantify that readership but a conservative guess would be somewhere between 600,000 and 800,000.
It seems that somewhere out there in reader land there are quite a few lunatic fringe dwellers who were determined to hand Richo's Labor Party its worst drubbing in history.
http://pickeringpost.com/story/scribblings-of-a-lunatic-fringe-dweller/2098

I was a long suffering member of HSU for 13 years. We the Allied Health professionals were sold to HSU from PSA like cows. In the early years my entire involvement was in the structure design of the new Award - first change for >40 years and much needed reform actually commenced by the PSA.

When I started paying attention to the wider Union, I noted there had been no election, ever, in my time there. The wider picture of the Williamson Tsardom had began to reveal itself. He had it so tied up, with every organiser directly owing him their job by being on his ticket. The organisers said black was white (and badly betrayed their members they allegedly represented) and active steps were taken to prohibit contact with other branches to hinder any foment of rebellion. Many old members and local delegates liked their Union sweeteners too. There is every chance he would have remained despite strongly growing unrest (especially among AH) if it was not for Kathy Jackson. Michael should have got bigger jail time as far as I'm concerned.

However, the real purpose of the enquiry is to put shit on Labor, I am not convinced it will serve a wider purpose other than factional retribution and Liberal satisfaction at waving dirty laundry. Labor's real issue is to shake the yoke of Union dominance of Caucus and their pronounced over representation both in caucus and as candidates for elections. What happened in WA with election of Jo Bullock and loss of Louise Pratt is just the pits. We shudda got 2 in, Bullock a grubby old Union hack should never have been a candidate for anything.

Unless Shorten can find some backbone, and I can't see that and think he's the wrong person to lead, then there is serious risk of losing to a bunch that's hated by more than half the country and remaining in opposition for ever till radical reform happens.

Quote Pete "She is telling the truth - Williamson, Thomson and Shorten want the truth hidden.
Well the truth is coming like a steam train Bill.
http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/"

Something fishy here - since when has michael smith been a friend of a unionist or is he playing games to get at Bill Shorten.

I would not trust M Smith as far as I could kick him

I know nothing personally about M Smith.   All I do know is that he tried to resurrect the AWU affair and Julia Gillard had him sacked from his job because he was trying to do so.

Well as a defender of the corrupt you would say that would t you .