Julia Gillard called before Royal Commission

THE royal commission into union corruption is calling Julia Gillard and a serving Federal Court judge, her former boss at law firm Slater & Gordon, to give evidence about allegations of fraud in the AWU slush fund scandal.


The commission, headed by retired High Court judge Dyson Heydon QC, has advised lawyers for the former prime minister and judge Bernard Murphy that they will be questioned under oath.


Other witnesses asked to provide statements and give evidence include one of Ms Gillard’s best friends, Robyn McCleod, senior solicitor John Cain junior, Queensland millionaire coal­miner and marina owner Paul Darrouzet, former AWU Victoria boss Bob Smith, and former heads of building company Thiess.


The hearings will occur over three days from September 9 when the anti-graft probe returns to its investigation of a union slush fund, which was established with legal advice from Ms Gillard to her then boyfriend, allegedly corrupt Australian Workers Union boss Bruce Wilson.


Justice Murphy headed the industrial unit at Slater & Gordon until he and Ms Gillard left the firm in 1995 amid a breakdown in trust among the firm’s partners over the discovery of the fund and a public controversy over another matter. The fund, called the AWU Workplace Reform Association, received large sums of money from Thiess in the 1990s. Shortly before she left the firm as a salaried partner, Slater & Gordon’s then boss, Peter Gordon, conducted an internal probe into the fund amid concerns that Mr Wilson, whose union was a significant client of the firm, had used it in a large fraud.


The AWU Workplace Reform Association registration documents that went to the West Australian government claimed its role was work safety and training.


During the confidential internal probe, Ms Gillard told Mr Gordon in a tape-recorded interview in 1995 that the association was really a “slush fund” for union elections. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were paid by Thiess into the slush fund.

FirstPrev123(page 3/3)
33 comments

Kody,

Yeah I Have to admit I do not follow these things over much. It does appear to be an ongoing state of affairs and if corruption is not found in one area it is in another.

It appears to be part of of our society, even human nature itself.

Power of any sort appears to give rise to corruption no matter what the stripe.

We are very flawed by nature it would seem.

Enough from me. Time to get ready for off for a day or three. A caravan camped in the bush has far greater attractions than the machinations of revolving door Royal Commissions.

Take it easy.

SD

Perhaps there is a correlation between lusting for power and achieving power. Those who lust and thus achieve (probably most of our politicians and Union bosses) are the most inclined to abuse power.

Maybe also includes CEOs of big companies too, Robi.

And the Pope 

As I have said on here before I want to see all crook politicians, trade unionists whoever all feel the full force of the law.

I care not one iota which political party they come from.  

Tit for tat of either political  side is of no value.   

What I will expect to see though, after the TURC has completed its findings, is honest criticism and or condemnation  of any union official, who is found to be  using  or has used workers'  union fees corruptly, and far less lecturing on morals and ethics from those who support them.

The thread nominates one person who is not a union official. Does that align with what you expect to see ?

It would seem to be more in line with your first comment.

Tit for tat of either political  side is of no value. 

FirstPrev123(page 3/3)
33 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment