What do you think ?

The material Petraeus handed over included, by his admission, information of the highest top-secret status. In intelligence terms, a treasure trove, and its public disclosure would have been ruinous to the USA's interests. Fortunately, none of it was ever made public. As for Petraeus's motivation, well, it was personal gain of the basest kind. He certainly didn't suggest he was acting in the public interest.

There's a second difference between these cases. As noted, Manning got 35 years and Snowden faces 30 years if the Americans ever get their hands on him. Petraeus, by contrast, has reached a plea bargain with US prosecutors under which he will plead guilty to a misdemeanour with a recommended penalty of two years' probation and a $40,000 fine. No jail time.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-04/bradley-petraeus-plea-deal-shows-bizarre-double-standard/6280708

source

5 comments

Handing over top secret documents is a crime be to a web site or a bed partner. Some US politicians wanted Assange to face the death penalty and he did not hand over secret documents but merely published them. Broadsheet media also published the same material yet did not face the same hostility. Snowden and Manning never profited from their leaks yet one is doing 35 years. Strange world.

Yes it is a strange world Geo,  I am of the opinion that Snowden etc deserve medals

It would seem Us Justice similar to the rest of the Western world do hand out a lesser sentence for plea bargain.

Plea bargain never makes sense to me, ie -- if you say you DID the crime --you get off ???? !!! but if you denigh you get more time !!??

I think it saves a lot of time and hence money on investigation ??? hence leniency is recomended ???

Yes but if someone ADMITS to a crime then IMO they are guilty ?

Abby and geomac ....they need to get off their butts and collect the tax that multi nationals are not paying, get rid of Negative Gearing and Salary Sacrifice and a lot of loopholes for the big end of town.

Also reduce a lot of the unnecessary aid to the world and process the boat people here in Australia instead of paying billions for other countries to do it.

Then slowly increase GST say 1% each year for a few years to 15% and quickly the budget would be returned to the black.

Same comment as given 3 x in

GST Increase to 15 pc recommended by CPA ?

Is there a problem with the website ?

 

 

Abby

I wondered what was going on as well. Certainly in the wrong thread.

Ahhhh Water Dragon, how refreshing to see someone who WANTS to throw away what few breaks we do get on taxation and actually PAY MORE to our Federal government - you must have a FAR higher opinion of them than me.

5 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment