Federal Budget 2018: 'Fattening older workers for the kill'

Sweeteners, but no Age Pension increase to allow a dignified retirement.

Federal Budget 2018: 'Fattening older workers for the kill'

There are many ways of looking at a Federal Budget. It really depends on who you are and what is at stake.

At the highest level, economists consider the sustainability of the Budget over the forward estimates period (i.e. the next four years) and beyond if further measures are proposed.

The next level down is that of a sector or interest group – perhaps an industry sector or business council or a not-for-profit. Here, the way the budget matches the interests of that group are of prime importance.

And then there are the more individual levels: Are you a worker, a student, a carer, a pensioner or a person with special needs? Here, the fine detail of your entitlements and ability to pay your bills is of paramount importance.

As the voice of retirement, YourLifeChoices is keenly interested in the welfare of Australian retirees and those planning to retire in the next 10 years. This means the six retirement tribes – the Affluents (self-funded single or couple homeowners), the Constrained (single or couple homeowners on a full or part pension) and the Cash Strapped (single or couple renters on a full or part pension). And we continue to ask the question whether everyone has a genuine chance to live a productive and dignified life in retirement?

We are also interested in the overall sustainability of a government’s budget. Put simply, is this nation racking up too much debt for future generations to reasonably manage?

So does Federal Budget 2018 deliver for retirees?

Our first impression is that this is indeed an election budget, with carefully calibrated income tax cuts for low and middle-income workers. There is no increase to the Age Pension – the base rate was last increased in 2009 and remains too low for a reasonable retirement life.

But given the Turnbull Government’s intention to raise the Age Pension age to 70, there is at last a recognition that things need to change if people are expected to work an extra three years beyond the current (increased) age of 67, due to commence in 2023.

So the sweeteners for older workers are a ‘living longer’ health program, with online checks on health, fitness and skills at age 45 and 65 and some community health funding.

Also a $10,000 restart subsidy for employers who hire older workers and a $2000 allowance for upskilling for mature age workers. Strangely, that program was introduced in the 2014 Budget. And it was a $10,000 subsidy even then.

The work bonus is an important plus, allowing older workers to earn up to $7800 without affecting their pension entitlements. As the Benevolent Society has noted, this is a long way from the opportunities Canadians have of earning up to C$1400 per week before an income test kicks. Further, in New Zealand there is no income test for the Age Pension. YourLifeChoices maintains that many older workers simply cannot continue to work until age 70. This is particularly the case in physically demanding jobs such as building, hairdressing, nursing and cleaning. Their bodies simply give out. Most people do not retire because they want an easier life – they are forced out of the workforce for health reasons. So to force such people onto Newstart at $40 a day is not just unrealistic, it is the wrong thing to do to people who have paid taxes for 40 years or more.

The expansion of the Pension Loans Scheme to full age pensioners and self-funded retirees is helpful for asset-rich, cash-strapped retirees lucky enough to own a home. But this is not a ‘gift’ from the Government, merely a loan for which 5.25 per cent interest will be charged. By expanding its role in the mortgage market, the Government will earn more money from this measure. And it must be totally galling for pensioner renters who are struggling to cover higher rents – taking 30 per cent of their income, according to the YourLifeChoices Retirement Affordability Index. They must be asking what is in this budget for them. There appears to be nothing.

In summary, we believe this Budget is ‘fattening older workers for the kill’ – for the move to an Age Pension age at 70. And when it comes to a question of sustainability, we do not share Mr Morrison’s optimism that this nation can lock in a seven-year program of tax cuts at a cost of $140 billion (over 10 years), in the hope that receipts will continue to be rosy.

There are too many external factors at play to commit younger generations to such a high level of debt.

Does the Budget deliver for you? What are the key benefits?

RELATED ARTICLES





    COMMENTS

    To make a comment, please register or login
    thommo
    9th May 2018
    10:28am
    This budget is a con...and an insult..As a pensioner, the govt will now let me work to earn an extra piddly $30 per week more without losing any pension, and will give an employer $10K to take me on. You can guess what will happen...the emplyer will take the $10K and then get rid of me.
    But enough..
    The real issue here is the lousy treatment of pensioners...Why don't they just increase the pension, and while they're at it, restore the assets test which effectively reduced my part pension by $14K per year...that was an act of betrayal and treachery which about 1 million pensioners won't every forget or forgive.. This govt will get wiped out at the next election, and good riddance to them...
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    10:53am
    That is nothing but a whole lot of whinging about nothing.
    fairplay
    9th May 2018
    11:12am
    Thommo,
    understand what you are saying and reckon there would be a lot of us in the same boat, however your income will only get worse under Labor's proposal to deny you of the FRANKING credits, so best not cut off your nose to spite your face.I agree it was a disgrace to keep changing super rules ( asset test and taper rates in recent times), but both sides do it and if Labor win the next election EVERY worker and SFR will be worse off due to Shorten and his mates policy on franking credits.
    thommo
    9th May 2018
    11:15am
    Old Geezer is obviously a LNP stooge and troublemaker
    sunnyOz
    9th May 2018
    11:15am
    Yep - can work ONE extra hour a week!! WHOOPEE!!!
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    11:17am
    It is a con thommo, better known as 'smoke and mirrors':

    1. where else in the developed world is the pension age 70?
    2. where else in the developed world are pensioners told to sell their homes (downsize) and live off the proceeds.
    3. where else in the developed world are pensions WITHHELD with an assets test intended to force retirees to squander a lifetime of work and savings and deny them a moderate life in retirement.

    This budget is more of the same. Try to imagine what this lot are ging to do IF they were to get back in. Monstrous behaviour again!

    Last thing is what happened to "Budget Repair" and why is $50 billion of the country's cash being handed to the rich and multinationals to take out of the country.

    You are too kind Kaye. This is a 'rape and pillage' budget intended to con those who are too stupid to see this lot for what they are: a rich man's tool for wealth transfer to the top. Study America to see the results!
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    11:17am
    Yes fairplay they will have something to really whinge about under Labor.
    East of Toowoomba
    9th May 2018
    11:24am
    Fairplay,
    I wonder do you own shares and receive franking credits and if you do, have you calculated how much tax you would actually pay on those shares that are tax free, should Labour get in?

    Although I don't own shares I am wondering how much pensioners are likely to be worse off? I hope you don't mind me asking but you so seem so knowledgeable, it would be helpful if everyone was able to get an understanding of just how detrimental it could be for pensioners if Labour got in.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    11:33am
    Any fair rendition of franked credits says that if x amount of tax has been paid, that is part of gross income. Therefore it is added to gross income for tax purposes, deductions are worked out, and taxable income is determined.

    At that point, the only tax payable should be the difference between the franked tax already paid and overall tax liability.

    I see no difference in any approach to this issue ..................... UNLESS the current situation is allowing recipients of franked credits to pay no tax, or is allowing them to not include that already paid tax as part of gross income.

    If that is the case, Shorten has a fair point, and everyone should be paying tax on income according to the same rules.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    11:39am
    The ATO says a return is due on excess franked credits.... it doesn't say anything about not notifying franked credits.

    This whole thing sounds like a storm in a teacup - unless some are getting away with cheating.


    Here seems to be a bug bear:-

    "The basis of the system is that if a company pays or credits you with dividends which have been franked, you may be entitled to a franking tax offset for the tax the company has paid on its income. The franking tax offset will cover or partly cover the tax payable on the dividends."

    https://www.ato.gov.au/Forms/You-and-your-shares-2013-14/?page=5

    The question again arises - why should a company not pay tax on its income.. and why should an individual not pay tax on his/her income?

    IF - as I've been told here - franking is tax paid ON BEHALF OF THE SHAREHOLDER - it is not part of company tax, and thus it appears the companies may be using this loop-hole to reduce their tax burden on income.

    I think this entire issue need s thorough review and straightening out.
    East of Toowoomba
    9th May 2018
    11:40am
    Thanks Trebor, so probably not much worse off at the end of the day?
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    11:59am
    If Labor gets in I will lose $25,000 of my income if I leave my investments where they are. So East of Toowoomba it is not an insignificant amount of money to most people.
    fairplay
    9th May 2018
    12:02pm
    Dear EAST OF TOOWOOMBA, Whilst i have asked my Industry Fund how i would be affected they simply cannot answer my question with any certainty only to comment that because my exposure to Australian shares through super is only a small percentage the impact would not be that great. It just indicates how complicated both sides of politics are making what should be something we can all understand.It is FRUSTRATING !! and just means we are making an industry out of financial planners and in the current environment they go hand in hand with politicians at the TOP of the list of who we all least trust. My understanding would be anyone who has Super will probably be affected by Labors policy on FRANKING credits , whether you be a worker or a SFR and invested in Australian shares.I think Shorten has back peddled on his initial policy by exempting anyone receiving a full or part pension , but please do not quote me as i am not 100% sure.I suppose we will all pick out certain elements we like or dislike about each side of politics and whilst for the most part of my life i have supported Labor i now find in retirement this may not be my best option at present.I am conflicted because like many of us we have been affected by Turnbull's asset test changes (most unfair to those that retired under a certain set of rules and may have made different decisions had they known , BUT how could they ... a good argument for GRANDFATHERING the rules for those that had already retired based on that set of rules at the time).My take is that i will be further disadvantaged should Shorten win and reckon there would be many in the same situation that do not want to be hit with a double whammy and let's face it Labor has a terrible track record in recent times with managing money eg.RUDD and his HARVEY NORMAN policy just one example .............Cheers
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    12:08pm
    I'm no expert, EOT, but it seems to me it might be the companies who are getting a benefit from this. Trouble is that if the companies are brought to heel - and we already know that only a third or so of the BCA member companies pay the full 30% company tax on taxable income (???) - and if the companies are slugged for more, they will take it out on their (small) shareholders - more as a political move than a real one, so as to put pressure on from the 'grass roots'.

    Of course the directors and such, who own the vast majority of the shares anyway, will not be affected and will still receive remuneration and bonuses.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    12:18pm
    I have seen letters from super funds telling people the non refund of franking credits will not affect them as they pay more than enough tax to cover it.

    However if that is true then logically retired people whose super is now tax free must be already missing out on the franking credits refunds that they should be entitled to receive.

    I have sent various super funds this question and have yet to receive a reply. I hope I am wrong but it looks to me that I may have exposed them for creaming off extra profits from self funded retirees.
    HarrysOpinion
    9th May 2018
    12:28pm
    Mick. Unfortunately, other countries are considering increasing the retirement age. 'Work until you drop dead' is the preferred policy. However, nothing is being done about Workcover in Australia for over 65s. They can't get affordable Income Protection Insurance, Accident Insurance being over over 65 and that includes personal loans and credit cards insurance protection.
    Apparently, Finland is discontinuing its universal pension plan after 2 years, finding it unsustainable.
    As for employer's subsidy of $10k to employ people over 50, this may work for 50-60s but not for over 65s
    "Strangely, that program was introduced in the 2014 Budget. And it was a $10,000 subsidy even then" - Do we have any statistics how this has panned out?
    GeorgeM
    9th May 2018
    12:37pm
    Good comments, thommo. Yes, your losing $14K is not important for OG, but his losing anything (can't say if he is lying about the amount as there is no proof) is a problem! Maybe, we should all vote for Labor just to ensure OG gets his justice as he applauded when others lost due to the Liberals action on the Assets test.

    That aside, no hope really from any of the 3 main parties even when we have "rivers of gold" revenue coming in, and I would recommend all vote AGAINST all current seat-warmers by putting them last. We don't want them getting their hands on fat, undeserved, unrested pensions after making others suffer. Maybe then new MPs / Independents may fight for the people - if they don't, turf them out next time / before they get to their min 8 years to qualify for their massive special pensions.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    12:50pm
    George I can assure you that if Labor gets in power and still has this policy on the table they will not get one extra cent out of me. I will just divest and earn my income elsewhere like many others will also do.

    Also you will find that many who lost on the change of the asset test will also lose under Labor's non return f franking credits policy. So your idea of voting Labor I to punish me will back fire on them instead. Not only have they lost their pension but 30% of their income as well.

    I have already divested quite a lot of money from the share market and if markets keep rising I will have little left in it by the time Labor comes to power anyway.
    Mad as Hell
    9th May 2018
    1:05pm
    In am similar situation as you thommo. We’ve been betrayed and lied to by the LNP and Greens. This is an election budget don’t vote the mongrels back into power.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:11pm
    Sounds like a good point, OG - maybe the franking credits you detail there are going into the fund for the bonuses of the operators... hmmmm..

    If anyone were to lose over changes to the current franking process - they must have been getting something for nothing.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    1:39pm
    I am certainly not getting one penny for nothing. I am just getting the excess tax paid for me back.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:43pm
    That's exactly why it would not change one cent, OG.... provided that is the entire case.

    This 'franking dividends' thing is a war of words - not facts and dollars and cents, and is a very effective scare campaign on the part of the LNP.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    2:17pm
    I can assure you that the self funded retiree who lost their pension due the asset test and now has to invest in shares paying franking dividends will tell you that it is a war of losing many more dollars to them.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    2:36pm
    Give me an example in figures.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    2:48pm
    Trebor if you have say $800,000 to invest you can put it in the bank at what 2.5% interest if you are lucky. That an income of $20,000. Buy shares in the banks at 10% gross return that gives you $80,000 including $24,000 in franking credits. Which one would you choose?
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    2:51pm
    Even putting half in the bank and half in bank shares is going to give you $50,000 including $12,000 in franking credits.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    4:53pm
    Trebor, I really thought we had got through to you that your understanding of what Shorten is proposing is WRONG. He is stealing the income of SFRs who rely on that income to exist. And OG is right that it's the poorer SFRs who will suffer - a massive 30% cut to income that is already, in many cases, way less than pensioners receive.

    Please tell me why an SFR should pay 30% tax on an income of maybe $20,000 a year or less, JUST BECAUSE THEY INVEST IN SHARES? Meanwhile, a worker on $120,000 a year gets their franking credits as a reduction of the tax they pay on their income, and pensioners keep their franking credits as a cash bonus on an income that is higher than the SFRs who are deprived? How can you justify that? And yes, that IS what Shorten has proposed. I don't know what you base your weird interpretation of the policy on, but you clearly are totally misinformed on the subject.

    FACT: Companies are owned by shareholders. The company - ON BEHALF OF THE SHAREHOLDERS - remits 30% of its profit to the ATO. It pays the balance to its shareholders with a notation that 30% tax has been deducted. No different from PAYG tax being taken from wages. The wage earner who has no legitimate tax liability expects to get it back, and he does. And so should the shareholder who has no tax liability. But Shorten says ''No, we won't give it back to the shareholder UNLESS he has substantial taxable income from other sources OR he gets a pension. If he's a struggling SFR depending on it to fund a decent lifestyle, we'll screw him over. And worse, if screwing him over reduces him to hardship and he has to apply for a pension at some future time, we'll tell him ''No, you STILL don't get your franking credits because you weren't a pensioner before March 28,2018. So you can continue to suffer unfair tax for the rest of your days.''

    Gee, that's really a great way to treat people who worked hard, saved well, and tried to help the national budget by not putting their hands out!

    BTW. I wrote to 18 ALP leaders, including Shorten and the Chris Bowen and stated that was my understanding of the policy and I was appalled at the unfairness of it and I did not get one reply. I also wrote to my local member, local Greens representative, and two leaders of the Greens. No reply. If my understanding was wrong, wouldn't you expect one of them to say so?
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    4:55pm
    Sorry, correction. I DID get ONE reply, from Tanya Plibersek, who said ''but it will only adversely affect a small number of self-funded retirees, and we had to do something to get revenues.''

    Oh, I see. If you screw over a small number who don't have much voting power, that's okay - no matter how evil, unfair, cruel or disgusting the policy. It's only bad if it affects a large group whose votes can make a real difference.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    5:35pm
    TREBOR - this sounds like a circular argument. OG is slagging Labor with no facts. I guess that is smear.
    The facts are franking credits work on eliminating double taxation. Sort of fair (?) that if the company has paid tax on the dividend then why should the recipient pay tax again, the logic being if the recipient were on a lower tax rate then he would get a refund, but if he were on a higher tax rate he would be making up the difference.
    The real issue is the gaming of the system by the wealthy with their over creative accounts, schemes and offshore tax shelters. In reality those on the top tax rate (48%) should be tipping in a bit more tax to the ATO because the company rate is only 30%. Vice versa for retirees who have a low or zero tax rate because they earn zip.
    The system should work. If it is not working then FIX THE PROBLEM rather than throw the baby out with the bathwater. As normal this lot are again preying on retirees who are not a burden on the public purse. When they become so this government will most definitely introduce legislation which will force retirees to sell their home and live on the proceeds.
    Anybody who votes for the current government is either mentally challenged. a dill or in the party.

    Mark my words it will end badly if this lot het back in. Uncle Rupert and our right wing media have a lot to answer for.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    6:10pm
    Shorten's not planning to take the 30% - his concern is over double dipping - and from what the ATO says - a bit of poor wording seems to give a loop hole that permits a company to pay franking credits and thus not pay tax on its income - while the shareholder still has to include franking credits in income.

    If the company is merely lodging tax in advance on behalf of the shareholder, to be later included in calculation of overall tax burden - the company should not also receive a tax deduction for doing so, since it comprises part of their dividend payout.

    I think the idea is that companies are double dipping here... which may be right - I'm not an expert.

    What could happen is that companies deprived of this tax loop hole could reduce dividend payments.

    As it stand, if you get a dividend payment with franking, you include franking in your gross income - so it is really no different from being paid dividend without franking for YOU. I think the issue is with companies.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    6:14pm
    OG - that's not the example requested - what, in figures, will you actually lose and how if franking is changed to the Shorten Principle?

    I thoughtwe'd determined already that it is with the company - and they might short change on dividends if they have to pay tax on their full taxable income - not that they do anyway in the majority of cases.

    Simply put - a company owes tax on its taxable income - a shareholder owes tax on his/her taxable income - if a company gives franking credits as part of dividend payout, it is not a legitimate deduction for the company, but it seems they are using it as such.

    That is double-dipping by companies - not shareholders - and since few companies pay full tax on their taxable income - it really should make no difference other than their trying to put pressure on by squeezing their minority shareholders until they scream.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    6:27pm
    Trebor you are shifting the goal posts again way off left field. If you haven't got it now then you never will. So just be quiet until you understand what is going on here.
    GeorgeM
    9th May 2018
    9:44pm
    Lots of diversions above from the main topic, and from thommo's great comments!

    Instead of reversing the Assets Test changes, the most serious issue now added is that the BIGGEST INCOME TAX CUT BENEFICIARIES (of over $7,000 per year) will be those earning around $200K, i.e. THE POLITICAL BACKBENCHERS, CROSS-BENCHERS AND THE OPPOSITION - what a huge Carrot to them to vote for it!!!!!

    VOTE THEM (Liberals, Labor, Nationals & Greens) ALL OUT!
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    10:19pm
    No, OG - I shifted no goal posts - you simply didn't answer the question asked.

    Give me an example with figures of how a shareholder will lose - try two approaches so we can see the difference.

    You said you'd lose $25k - that's a lot to lose - so you should be able to support that with figures.

    HOW would the Shorten Principle remove $25k from your gross income?
    MICK
    10th May 2018
    8:25am
    It would be wonderful if we all took this medicine as the political class would be fixed overnight. Sadly most people support their political 'football' team and spout the propaganda they put out. It never ceases to amaze me that many voters have the misconceived belief that Independents cannot govern a nation. They can.
    sunnyOz
    13th May 2018
    10:56am
    HS - the budget promise of $10,000 for employers to take on seniors - nothing new, that is a con as it is already in place!
    You ask how it panned out - well in all the time it was available, less than 1,000 employers took up the offer. It was an abject failure. PLUS that amount is taxed. Employers are not interested.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    10:34am
    Let us not lose sight of the reality that a 'budget' is nothing but a forward estimate and a guess at what might be spent in certain areas. It is not dollars in the bank and has no comparison with actual spending, and a 'surplus' or 'deficit' budget is only an estimate of what it MIGHT look like at year's end.

    If politicians were honest they'd p0ut out a budget at year's start and then compare it direct at year's end.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    10:44am
    That said -the jiggling around pensions is silly - most pensioners and retirees don't work, a 5.25% compound interest rate is hardly appealing and the view that pensioners might have a need to use this loan facility to make ends meet is frankly disgusting on the part of government. Fits with their base idea that people should be totally funding their own retirement even when the government stuffs the economy for them.

    Is Morrison going to sit down with The Cormannator and smoke a big cigar and then vote himself a big pay rise as a bonus for all the god work?

    I'm reading a book about the actions of certain Unions during WW II - and at one point a contributor (real letters etc) says that the government did nothing to control this, but that it was easy to do nothing while sitting in Canberra and feasting off the best the land could provide while the troops went without food due to strikes and such.

    Nothing new under the sun... I'm warming to that Canadian idea and that tiny little New Zealand idea..... this allegedly 12th 'richest' nation in the world is remarkably poverty-stricken except in some circles - and yet other nations without massive resource exports can do better than our governments do for the unemployed and retired.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    11:20am
    This is a con budget intended to fool the fools and not upset too many (average) voters so that this lot can be pushed back into power. Then the real poison comes out. Think about what happened after the last 2 elections. This time will be the same if voters put this lot back in.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    12:20pm
    Stop with your lies and scaremongering Mick
    It’s a good budget - giving back to the poor and middle class
    There is nothing bad in the budget for anyone
    The real poison will be if labor get elected
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    12:30pm
    We think alike Bob. I worked for a group which demanded budget forecasts with evidence to support projections and my annual salary increment was only approved if I had either exceeded my profit forecast or could prove that events totally unforeseen or out of my direct control had caused a shortfall. Not only could I lose my annual increment if I failed to deliver, two consecutive years meant that I would not only lose my annual increment but also my position.

    Governments will tell us what they like with no evidence to back up their projections and, like this budget, will become Santa Claus each three years to keep their job. When the election is over, the excuses as to why they cannot honour their promises will come thick and fast.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:21pm
    You got it, OM - we'll get the gifting now - roll out the pork barrel in an election year - then it will be 'hard times' all over again next year and the year after - then it will suddenly be sunshine and roses again.

    If only those who set budgets and targets etc could operate with real figures instead of figures in their heads.

    Pretty much all I see is fiddling with the edges here and nothing of substance.

    At the moment I'm not well enough to go over the budget in detail... maybe tomorrow...

    The hypocrisy I found most astounding was saying that since '410,000 jobs had been created' - there was no reason to raise Unemployment Benefits. Nonsense in the real world of insufficient job numbers, and I suppose we'll just have to put up with the development of an underworld all over again after the prosperous years, and the rise of a permanent under-privileged class along with a permanent criminal class. It's easier to make a million selling drugs than it is to work for it - I met a drug dealer once and he said - "I get two years in prison - my girlfriend lives in my house and I'm buying another one - my bills are paid by the 'mob' and I get money in here. I'll get out and do it again." He was mid twenties and already headed for riches, while 'honest' folk struggle to eat sometimes. His descendants will run this country and be doctors and lawyers and politicians and feed off the fat.

    I read a book on the true history of Bonnie and Clyde and it was appalling the way most were treated back then and turned to crime - they knew they were headed for the grave, but they were anyway, so they figured they might as well do it with some money - legal or not.
    libsareliars
    9th May 2018
    4:11pm
    Agree with you whole heartedly Trebor. This country under this government is going to hell in a handbasket. I'd prefer my meagre tax break go to those on Newstart and Youth Allowance and to be put towards services such as health, education and renewable energy research & development.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    4:29pm
    Have you seen the wastage in health and education? It is astounding! More money will only make it worse not better.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    4:36pm
    Health and education are a state responsibility OG. You are muddying the waters.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    5:14pm
    Why are so many whinging about the budget not having enough money for health and education then?
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    5:18pm
    Because of people like you, OG, who don't know any better.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    5:41pm
    Raphael - a good budget? You crack me up but what else does one expect from a government representative on this website.
    If you claim that the pennies most people are getting compares to the tens of thousands of dollars the top will get if tax cuts get up then you must be a bigger moron than I took you for. But then you are posting cash for comment so maybe I am wrong?

    OG - have a look where this government is spending $100 million of valuable taxpayer money. On a women's feel good gender equality talkfest. I have seen this sort of thing before. It will be the same: a total waste of money with nothing to come out of it other than hot air. Pensioners to pay?????
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    6:20pm
    Anyone else noticed that the things I posted above - of the establishment and perpetuation of an underworld, a criminal class and an under-privileged class - go hand in hand with the kind of 'leftie' revolution, and/or sabotage etc - that became very common in the deprived times, especially the 1920's and 1930's - when there was a massive rise in Communism in the West, along with a criminal class and so forth?

    Continuing down the road we are on is leading this nation and society into that same trap for the many, with the difference that these days the criminal class has no class and considers anyone else fair game - whereas the old criminal class had values, such as you don't rob ordinary people etc.

    This new brand of criminal class is much worse......
    Kathleen
    9th May 2018
    11:08am
    The thing about the budget that screamed at me was the unfairness to the lowest earning worker. Someone on $40,000 will pay the same rate of tax as someone on $199,000. The low paid worker would spend every cent thus stimulating the economy so why not tax him less, far less than the high income earner.
    The other thing is a warning. Do not sell a portion of your home to the government or a bank. If desperate, sell and find your own home to create a bit of cash if desperate. Keep the home in your name solely, trust no one taking a piece of your modest home.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    11:12am
    It is great to see that workers are finally not getting over taxed for their overtime worked. Awesome move by the government.
    thommo
    9th May 2018
    11:13am
    agree with you Kathleen
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    11:22am
    OG - you are clearly being paid for comment. Stop!
    The 'tax relief' for lower workers is zip. The real action is happening at the other end. Not only do wealthy Australians income earners benefit from accounting fiddles and offshore tax havens but now this rich man's government is giving these people a huge tax windfall and selling it as progress and jobs. It isn't. It's the next LNP lie meant to fool voters.
    Misty
    9th May 2018
    11:48am
    I think OG is wearing 2 Blue Ties today judging by his comments.
    Misty
    9th May 2018
    11:48am
    I think OG is wearing 2 Blue Ties today judging by his comments.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    12:10pm
    Maybe we need a neck-tie party........................
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    12:16pm
    Those who work extra hours should receive a concessional rate of tax for doing so............... (now there's a startling idea)...
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    12:22pm
    Kathleen - you simply don’t understand the tax system

    The poor pay far less tax than the high earners

    Go find a simple tax calculator on the web
    enter your numbers and see for yourself
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    12:37pm
    80% of the tax is paid by the top 20% income earners so why shouldn't they and middle income earners get a bit extra instead of continually giving it all the whinging pensioners.
    GeorgeM
    9th May 2018
    12:41pm
    Kathleen they want to to give a BIG FAT TAX CUT to Politicians (backbenchers, cross-benchers and even the opposition) to ensure they vote for these tax cuts as they are set to gain the maximum of $7K+ cut in taxes based on their $200K salaries!!! Simple really! Disgusting creeps!
    Kathleen
    9th May 2018
    12:52pm
    Raphael, if you earn $40,000 or less you really can’t afford to lose and up to $60,000 should be considered as low income earners and every cent is precious to them.
    Here is an example for you, this is a real one!
    When the top earners were hit with the budget emergency tax a family lost $6,000. They said that was their annual holiday. However, that same year the whole family went to Paris.
    Do you understand?
    What is normal for one is not normal for another?
    Someone on $40,000 or so would not even dream about going to Paris!
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:25pm
    The poor have far less money on which to pay tax..... what would you have them do, Rafe? Pay 200% of their income so they can match the income tax paid by the fat cats? Take out a loan so they can pay their 'fair' share of income tax and pass it down to their descendants?

    Easy fix - pay everyone the same as the fat cats and they will all pay more tax - yeah - that'll work...... (rolls eyes emotion inserted) ....

    The fat should be proud to pay tax to support this nation that feeds them so well.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    1:38pm
    Kathleen and Trebor
    You guys are amazing - no matter how much tax the so called wealthy pay, you will never be satistisfied until you get the same income as them.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:47pm
    Not my argument, Rafe - you're the one complaining that the peasants pay less tax..... I'm just offering you a viable solution to that issue.....

    Better still - why not restrict all incomes to the same level, and that way everyone can pay the same tax..... we could go either way here to find a solution to the 'issue' of the fat paying more tax. Simple enough. Just pay everyone the same whether it be high or low..... no problem.

    Where is your pride, man, in supporting a nation that supports you?

    I long ago said I was happy to pay income tax, since in return I got to own destroyers, F-111s and all that and it was put to good use..... well - in some ways it was.
    Kathleen
    9th May 2018
    1:49pm
    Raphael, what income? Beside the point!
    Oh you have misread me. We need the high income people for sure because we need them to help the economy. If they pay their fair share of taxes good on them. Many do not and now th government is treating the poor and rich the same percentage wise!
    However, people have the same needs, namely, food and shelter.
    Everyone pays GST which is enough for the really low income people to contribute similar to pensioners.
    The point a lot of us are trying to drive home is what poor people are left with is cruel!
    Go support your LNP but some of us on here recognise their lack of compassion and fairness!
    Jim
    9th May 2018
    3:10pm
    Am I confused with the tax rate, doesn't the tax rate change only apply to low and middle income earners, those on $199,000 a year don't recieve a tax cut for about 7 years. As for the usual claim by Mick that anyone who disagrees with him is on the payroll of the LNP its very clear to everyone who he supports, so does that make him an employee of labor? As I have commented before on these pages I have had dealings with Bill Shorten, the man is an absolute grub, I am not against labor but I am definitely against Shorten he was and still is a traitor to the working man and will do nothing for the worker but will do plenty to feather his own nest and that of his left wing cronies, no doubt many will say the LNP are no better and I might agree, but wasn't it Shorten who raised the retirement age, I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong. Once and for all the tax paid on dividends is tax paid on behalf of the investor and is therefor refundable to the tax payer, if the dividend is unfranked meaning no tax has been paid the nothing is refundable but the dividends are still counted towards your income, if you are below the tax free threshold then no tax is payable if you are above the tax free threshold then you pay tax on the income.
    libsareliars
    9th May 2018
    4:13pm
    I agree with you Kathleen and Trebor.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    5:44pm
    Raphael - I am right. You are a moron.
    The level of tax has nothing to do with this and TREBOR is on the money. It is ONLY the PERCENTAGE OF INCOME which counts.
    The rich pay a low low percentage. The poor pay a high percentage. And then remember that the rich fudge their TAXABLE income figure BEFORE tax is even calculated.
    You know all of the above and are clearly a government stoolie misleading readers. Funny how your posts are so in line with the dishonesty of this government. Disgraceful Australian! Have you no shame.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    6:29pm
    Mick the proposal is that most people will pay 32.5% in tax.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    8:11pm
    "Most" people will pay according to the tax bracket they are in. Some will pay zero and others 48%.
    Because you earn a fair bit OG you will likely lose the imputation credits. That's how it works.
    It is fair.
    VeryCaringBigBear
    9th May 2018
    8:55pm
    Mick if OG earns a fair but then he can use his franking credits to reduce all the tax he pays. Labor is not going to hurt him at all.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    10:24pm
    Very good, VCBB. Nor will it hurt others who are playing the game fairly and squarely.

    Again - a company should pay tax on its income, and an individual should pay tax on his/her income. Giving out dividends is not a tax deduction - it is sharing the profits of a year's work, from after-tax income.

    Sounds pretty simple to me.
    MICK
    10th May 2018
    8:27am
    Shorten may want to clarify his policy but unlikely the right wing media will air this as it puts a dent in the media's ability to discredit Labor.

    9th May 2018
    11:45am
    sensationalist heading
    Unfortunately nothing in the article supports the “fattening for the kill” headline

    The tax cuts are a god send for middle and low income workers and will be a boost to the overall economy
    Kathleen
    9th May 2018
    12:57pm
    Dream on Raphael! $10 may mean a lot like a loaf of bread and a large bottle of milk not two coffees at a cafe to the very poor but it still is inequitable because of lifestyles between the rich and poor.
    The poor struggle to make ends meet whilst the wealthy plan an overseas trip.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    2:19pm
    Yes Kathleen how come all the cruise ships are full of pensioners.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    2:37pm
    They're not - they're full of retirees....
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    2:44pm
    Nope most are pensioners not retirees. Retirees take more expensive holidays instead.
    Kathleen
    9th May 2018
    3:44pm
    OG, I am not even talking about pensioners. I am discussing the lowest paid workers who end up with something equal to a pension in amounts but who have to go to work which has costs associated with it.

    Cruise ships full of pensioners? How many people on a full pension and nothing besides can afford to cruise? You will find they have other money to afford to do that. Cruises are not cheap by a pensioner’s standards. Out of three or four hundred a week how long would it take to save for a cruise? Maybe a road trip to see the grandkids might be on the agenda but beyond that by the time they saved something it would go on necessities.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    4:47pm
    Kathleen you can hear all the pensioners crowing all over the ship how good the pension is to be able to avoid such trips.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    5:14pm
    Yes, OG, you can hear those with $500,000 in the bank and a fat part pension crowing about how much better off they are than the battlers who saved $850,000 or $900,000 and are being screwed over for doing so, and crowing about how much better life is for them than it is for either struggling pensioners or poor SFRs, but those crowing are a small minority - growing now that the government has made self-funded retirement so hard. The cost of pensions is rising now, funding more people to crow about their cruising while savers who might have helped the budget are crucified and pensioners who have no savings are half-starved.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    5:46pm
    The poor have lost $50 a week in bracket creep over the past decade and you claim that $5 back is a "godsend". Liberal liar!
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    10:25pm
    OG - are YOU the one breaking into their cabins on all these cruises and rifling through their personal papers to discover that they are all pensioners pure and simple?

    Bloody criminal..... must be a crew member..... a Lascar perhaps who doesn't vote or pay taxes here...
    Old Geezer
    10th May 2018
    9:47am
    No Trebor I don't have to break into cabins as they all tell how good it is to be on the pension as they can afford to go on cruises. Some do 3 or 4 a year. Quite frankly they annoy me with their badge of honour from collecting welfare.
    Tib
    9th May 2018
    11:56am
    I don't see anything that supports the headline. I judge these political parties by their past performance. So I see labor as stupid and the liberals as slippery. Both as untrustworthy. What a choice.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    12:52pm
    Yes Tib, who can ever forget 'There will be no carbon tax under a government I lead?' What a cracker! The government may have its faults - and indeed it does, but the other mob were left in an amazing financial position, and like kids in a lolly shop, shoved as much goodies down there own throats (figuratively), until they made themselves, and all the rest of us, sick, and we are still trying to get out of the mess. Who wants to go back to that? In Victoria, they spawned a Premier, who spent $1.2 billion to not build a road; and a further $3.2 billion on a desal plant that has yet to produce a litre of useable water. This country cannot afford a repeat of the ineptitude of these clueless imbeciles, no matter what Mick, Tib and the rest of you loony lefties have to say!
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:48pm
    There will be no GST under a government I lead........ who could forget..... (rofl emoticon inserted with glee)....
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:50pm
    The Victorian government paid out a contract locked in by their Liberal forebears, so as to not provide a road not necessary or functional - the blame lies with those who let the contract.

    Just another Liberal way of handing a few lazy bill out of the public purse to mates for doing nothing.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:51pm
    Desal works well enough in Saudi.... if and when there arises another need - the structure is still there,
    Tib
    9th May 2018
    2:25pm
    Big Al as usual you are talking garbage. The national dept is higher than its ever been under the Liberal mismanagement, remember the budget emergency. Now they are handing out tax cuts to big business. It's a budget emergency when they want us to pay and a free for all when handing out money to big business. Labor was in the middle of the GFC what's the liberal excuse.
    https://thenewdaily.com.au/money/finance-news/2017/03/26/coalition-debt-exceeds-labor/
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    5:47pm
    Whilst I agree with you your choice is pretty clear Tib. Labor is looking after most Australians whilst Liberal is looking after the 1% + slavery for the rest of the country. Pretty clear cut I might have thought.
    VeryCaringBigBear
    9th May 2018
    8:59pm
    LNP looks after me very well. Lucky I'll a pensioner so I get my franking credits refunded under Labor too. Thank goodness I rearranged my financial affairs so I am not a self funded retiree.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    9:14pm
    Sounds good. The sick reality is that self funded retirees are not a burden on taxpayers but are under attack for this. Politics does not get much worse than this: attacking the aged for doing the nation a kindness. That is the problem with the bastards who call themselves the government at present. Soon to be changed.
    VeryCaringBigBear
    9th May 2018
    9:43pm
    Mick I'm concerned that Labor is up to something more sinister and it franking credit policy is a mere smoke screen.For some reason I just can't bring myself to tryouts them either.
    GeorgeM
    9th May 2018
    10:00pm
    Yes, Tib, both are untrustworthy.

    The big added worry now is that the BIGGEST INCOME TAX CUT BENEFICIARIES (of over $7,000 per year) will be those earning around $200K, i.e. THE POLITICAL BACKBENCHERS, CROSS-BENCHERS AND THE OPPOSITION - what a huge Carrot to them to vote for it!!!!!

    VOTE THEM (Liberals, Labor, Nationals & Greens) ALL OUT!
    MICK
    10th May 2018
    8:30am
    I don't Know VCBB but I'd be thinking Labor's long game might be to close some of the fraudulent mechanisms rich people have put in place to avoid paying their rightful taxes. I would support that because it is plain unfair for the wealthiest amongst us to avoid paying tax when the poorest have no way out.
    Old Geezer
    10th May 2018
    9:52am
    Mick the wealthy win under Labor's policy as VCBB is trying to point out. It is those who rely on this extra income that Labor wants to take from them that are the losers.

    Anyone rich enough will just invest elsewhere so Labor doesn't get anything out of them. By the look of certain shares this is already happening.
    MICK
    11th May 2018
    8:03am
    You have it the wrong way around OG. Labor is not after your money. The Coalition is....to give to the rich.
    I hope you watched last night's reply by Shorten. Retirees NOT AFFECTED IN ANY WAY and the dividend imputation refunds will not be removed. End of BS!

    9th May 2018
    12:09pm
    Here we go again, it's a good budget, it's a bad budget, this group got looked after, this group missed out again, the AAA rating looks like being downgraded. It's a budget the same as every other budget, some winners, some losers and the comments are wholly dependent on which side you support. What this budget is above everything else is an election budget, designed to make more people happy than unhappy. Every major party has an election budget solely to attract voters, not do anything for the economy, live with it.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    5:49pm
    It's a dishonest budget OM. The peanuts thrown at most Australians will be ripped back as soon as the election is done if this lot get back in. Remember Tony Abbott?
    GeorgeM
    9th May 2018
    9:50pm
    It's not just an election budget, it's a disgusting attempt to con the people and divert riches to the top end of town. It has 2 MAJOR objectives:

    1. Secure big tax cuts for big business, and newly added (a la Trump),

    2. Big tax cuts for the rich - with those on $200K salaries to get the biggest tax cuts of $7K+. Since this exactly benefits the MPs (base salary for backbenchers / opposition / cross-benchers being around $200K), there is a strong chance this policy may pass due to the greed of the MPs.

    Rest of the Budget is just smoke & mirrors, not meant to really help anyone!
    4b2
    9th May 2018
    12:14pm
    This is an election budget it has all of the devious schemes used by Howard and Costello built in. They conned the tax payers while riding on the mining boom. Mal an co does not have that advantage. Smarten up when the vote comes around.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    12:36pm
    I agree 4b2 and you have reminded me of the con trick perpetrated by Costello although I can't remember which election he did it. There was a budget where he spent the lot and when Howard called an election, the cupboard was bare. Howard rested on his laurels, pointing out what had been done leaving Labor with no money to make any promises.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    1:19pm
    You two are living in fantasy land! There was no debt, repeat, no debt, when Dudd won the election in 2007. What part of surplus do you not understand? It took crooked Kev and Jaded Julia a little over two years to 'rectify' this 'parlous' state of affairs - so stop revising history - it is less than 10 years ago - do you think the rest of us are stupid?
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:30pm
    A surplus budget is not cash in the bank, Big Al - get your mind right. It's just a guessing game with fudged figures on estimates.

    You are one of those who mistakes a budget for real figures..... what would have been left after twelve months of 'Howard's surplus' - nothing, as history showed.
    Jim
    9th May 2018
    3:21pm
    History showed that Rudd wiped out the real surplus, as Costello stated in his comments on this current budget, it took them 10 surplus budgets to get a real surplus and get debt free, I haven't seen any comments from the experts that what Costello stated was untrue, maybe you have information that supports your point of view.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    4:30pm
    Rudd didn't stop at the surplus he made sure we had a decent debt when they left and well into the future with their stupid schemes.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    5:07pm
    Jim, Costello wiped out the surplus long before Rudd took the reins. The figures just didn't reflect it because he did it by creating advance obligations that he knew could not be met when the boom ended. It was Costello who created the debt. He was just smart enough not to let the data reveal the truth.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    5:22pm
    Nothing like the advance obligations Rudd and Gillard left though.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    5:44pm
    Gee Big Al, I can't see where either 4b2 or I have said anything about debt. We spoke of budgets which have little or nothing to do with the national debt. To make it simple for you Big Al, the budget is all about money in and money out, the same as a wage earner getting paid and having to use that money to pay for food, clothing, mortgage/rental/board and savings. There is also a debt, the same as a wage earner may have a mortgage, which is paid for out of any money left over from the budget. Coalition people know what a surplus budget is, Labor people haven't a clue.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    5:54pm
    A response to a few issue aired above.

    Yes 4b2, it is a con. Only thing missing is Work Choices but that has been creeping in during the past 10 years by stealth under any other name.

    I can't believe the BS about the Rudd years being dredged up. Next we'll get a rendition of pink batts and school halls. For the record look up the meaning of 'GFC'. Rudd got in and it hit. Funny that. I never heard you complaining about losing your job after this hit Jim...but you are happy to deride the PM of the time who made the call. You are having your cake and eating it too but should show some gratitude that you and your family were not sacrificed like so many others around the world.
    FYI NO COUNTRY ran a surplus after the GFC!
    Linda
    9th May 2018
    12:24pm
    While I am always interested in government doings regarding retired people, I would like to see some commentary on how this will impact all Australians. The high cost of a place to live is standing out as something that is important to every Australian. Have they done enough? I don't think so.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    12:31pm
    I agree for once we have a budget that helps people other than those whinging pensioners and low income earners.
    Kathleen
    9th May 2018
    1:10pm
    OG, The poor lowly paid worker does not score much at all. Yes, $10 helps when you are that poor, but not enough! They needed to pay next to no tax as they contribute via GST as all their money is spent. I feel for them as they have to work and survive very humbly!

    I appreciate my pension and am thankful for it. However, I do not appreciate the government thinking I am stupid enough to give them my home which is not a million dollar one before you try that argument.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    3:31pm
    $10 would be enough to feed us for about 3 days.
    libsareliars
    9th May 2018
    4:19pm
    "$10 would be enough to feed us for about 3 days."
    LOL another one who thinks that those on Newstart should be able to live on $40/day, all the while complaining about losing $25,000 of his income from his investments if Labor took away his favourable dividend rort!
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    4:27pm
    No Labor wont take anything away from me and it's only a rort if you are not smart enough get it yourself.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    5:58pm
    Linda - I am aware of the cost of housing. Enormous...but this has happened before. Having recently returned from overseas I notice the rise in food prices again. Huge. Is nobody seeing this?

    OG - what a load of BS. We are experts at living on the smell of an oily rag. Went shopping today and you cannot feed yourself for 3 days on $10 unless you buy a packet of flour from Aldi and a handful of bananas, make dampers, and eat that. Food is becoming a luxury are Woolies and Coles drive prices through the roof. Likely inflation imposed on us!
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    6:37pm
    Just worked out it cost me less than a dollar for the food I ate today. So I was wrong $10 will last me more than 3 days
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    8:13pm
    OG - as normal NO DETAILS. Elaborate your claims if they are to be taken seriously.
    VeryCaringBigBear
    9th May 2018
    9:02pm
    Thank goodness I can afford to eat out and not have to live like OG. Life is good on the pension.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    9:15pm
    Good on you.
    Anonymous
    10th May 2018
    1:23pm
    OG brags about being wealthy, paying tax, and buying cruises for his family. Gee. I'd rather enjoy decent food and good company over a meal out when I feel like it. If it takes reducing the food budget to $1 a day to get rich, I'll pass. Happy is way better than wealthy anyway!
    GeorgeM
    9th May 2018
    12:28pm
    What does this Budget deliver for Older Australians including pensioners - NOTHING!
    Decency demanded that now that it's confirmed there was no Budget Emergency (it was a lie) and we have "rivers of gold" instead, the bastardly Asset Test changes from Jan 2017 should be reversed.
    Alternatively, they should implement Universal Pension for all simply based on Age (65) and years of Residency (say 15 yrs), with NO Asset, Income or Partner tests. Save lots of Centrelink costs, and also abuse for the elderly!

    Also, where is the Minimum Tax approach / any alternative actions to ensure all Companies and the Wealthy pay their fair share of tax??? Not even Labor talks about it!

    Note that the BIGGEST INCOME TAX CUT BENEFICIARIES (of over $7,000 per year) will be those earning around $200K, i.e. THE POLITICAL BACKBENCHERS, CROSS-BENCHERS AND THE OPPOSITION - what a huge Carrot to them to vote for it!!!!!
    VOTE THEM (Liberals, Labor, Nationals & Greens) ALL OUT!
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    12:31pm
    No it helps the workers instead which is awesome.
    GeorgeM
    9th May 2018
    12:48pm
    Rubbish, OG, workers will get a sandwich and a milkshake ($0 - $10 per week), whereas the rich will get $7K+ per year, including all Politicians! NOT AWESOME for workers at all, you need to get your brain checked! Anyway, my comments were mainly focused on Older Australians, especially pensioners (full or part), not workers, so your comments are just a diversion from facts - as usual.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    12:53pm
    George the rich were once workers too so I really can't see what the problem is with them getting a well deserved tax break too.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:52pm
    OG - most of the rich were never workers... they inherited and were slotted into nice little earners by family and mates... look at Fat Joe for example....
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    2:22pm
    Our PM wasn't rich either until he won the "lottery" by having a few shares at the right time.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    2:39pm
    Yes - a few can be lucky - remember the odds on winning at a poker machine? Much the same - luck can have something to do with it - but luck is indiscriminate and as hard to find as a fish when you are keen to catch one...
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    5:05pm
    OMG, OG! You think someone who INHERITED over $100 million was ''not wealthy''. Dream on idiot! Turnbull went to the most exclusive private school in the nation. His father owned a chain of hotels, and he inherited over $100 million from his grandfather before he finished university. He won the lottery alright - the BIRTH LOTTERY.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    5:16pm
    Wrong Rainey he had very little until he was working for Ozemail and had a heap of their shares when they were taken over. A good friend was at uni with him and he had no more than the rest of them.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    6:00pm
    OG - you keep repeating that workers received a windfall in the budget. WRONG. You know that.
    Workers were thrown a few peanuts to make it look like they were getting something and so they would not look closely at the huge amount of money going to the top 1% in (company) tax cuts. That is where the real action is but you know that.
    VeryCaringBigBear
    9th May 2018
    10:15pm
    Mick if you say the LNP only looks after 1% how come over 50% voted them in? I personally don't like Labor's attack on self funded retirees taking another 30% of their income either. I this policy alone may lose them government if people start believing the truth on how it really works.
    MICK
    10th May 2018
    8:37am
    People with big salaries and self employed people have the perception that the coalition is on their side. Up to a certain income they'll only get peanuts. The other stereotype is people who are conned into believing lies about 'jobs & growth' and what is good for the nation....lies to con the mentally challenged.
    Can you please clarify how retirees are losing 30%? I suspect you are referring to franking credits and it is uncertain how these are going to go. My understanding is that Shorten is trying to cull these for wealthy citizens who have zip taxable income because of creative and fraudulent accounting and then claim back the tax paid by companies....which retirees earning zip have a perfect right to claim off their tax.
    HarrysOpinion
    9th May 2018
    12:43pm
    Does the Budget deliver for you?
    -NO. IT DOES NOT !
    What are the key benefits?
    -THERE ARE NONE! said , the age pensioner over 70 years of age.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    12:54pm
    Well I'm over 70 and still no age pension for me.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:27pm
    You've got to much to get it, OG - by your own statements.... you forever rant about pension only being for need - you have no need yet whine about not getting it....

    **wears out the eyes rolling emoticon by inserting it again**
    HarrysOpinion
    9th May 2018
    1:40pm
    That's because you have investments and are wealthy. Old Geezer.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    1:42pm
    Nope I'm not wealthy at all. I just don't spend much.
    HarrysOpinion
    9th May 2018
    1:44pm
    You are wealthier than the common OAP, Old Geezer, you don't qualify!
    HarrysOpinion
    9th May 2018
    1:46pm
    Because if you could qualify, you'd be eating humble pie or as Malcolm said to Lucy, "Let them eat cake" !
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:53pm
    You claim that changes to franking dividends would cost you $25k - yet you say you are not wealthy but instead you spend little...

    Amazing - simply amazing....

    You're a fantasist, OG.. pure and simple.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    2:21pm
    You don't have to have that much money or earn much more than $25,000 to get $25,000 in franking credits. Anyone with just enough assets not to get the pension can do it quite easily.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    5:02pm
    Trebor, my taxable income would be $20,000 a year if I gave up work, with NO pension entitlement, and over $6000 of that would be franking credits that Shorten wants to steal.

    OG is wealthy. I am NOT. And I am far more typical of those Shorten's cruel policy will tax unfairly.

    I despise the LNP. They stole up to $20,000 a year from less well off SFRs. Now Shorten is determined to finish the job of wiping out everything they saved for a lifetime to achieve and forcing them onto pensions, but he's making sure they continue to suffer long after they qualify for a pension. Apparently, saving is now a crime.
    MICK
    11th May 2018
    8:05am
    OGR - did you watch last night's response to the Budget from Shorten? Your franking credits are safe as Shorten made of point of stating retirees would not lose $1 of this. End of argument.
    Ironman162
    9th May 2018
    12:56pm
    Has there ever been a good budget?
    It's always good for some and bad for others.
    The money is taken from some and given to others in various forms. Remember the Government is only managing your money.
    Has all the whining and winging ever changed anything?

    Many retirees won't live past 68, just look at the Births and Deaths in the paper.

    These are the realities, older people are not welcome and no one wants us unless we can pay, support and give just like we have done for that last 70 odd years.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:28pm
    The number of my school year who didn't make it to 65 is appalling... yeah -raise the pension age to 70....
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    1:41pm
    It was a good budget as it put money back where it is need and can be used to further stimulate the economy.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    1:56pm
    The economy could be stimulated by increasing pensions and unemployment benefit, thus boosting spending on essentials and in areas where it will return into the tax cycle immediately.

    This contrasts with giving corporations $50bn in the hope that they will stimulate the economy - when the reality is it will mostly vanish offshore never to be seen again - Gonski forever... or will go to people who will spend it on deadstock like serial housing and offshore trips of a lifetime... neither of which returns revenue into the tax cycle.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    2:03pm
    Transaction taxes could be re-visited..... to resolve this issue of offshoring billions without paying taxes...
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    2:15pm
    Transaction taxes will hurt pensioners more than anyone else or should they just a transaction exempt welfare card instead?
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    2:31pm
    Trebor and Mick are good examples why you should never vote labor
    No clue about managing economy or helping the poor and middle class
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    4:57pm
    Transaction taxes WOULD NOT hurt pensioners, because you would be replacing a 10% GST with a 2% transaction tax, and fuel and other taxes would also be abolished. MASSIVE BENEFIT to the poor and middle class. The rich don't want it because it would finally force them to pay their way, so they will continue to tell huge lies. We are onto you, OG! People are not as stupid as you seem to think.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    5:20pm
    We will never see such a tax here in Australia.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    6:09pm
    Good one ironman.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    6:32pm
    Well said, Rainey.

    Some figures were done on this a long time ago or whatever - and showed that a transaction tax as low as 2% would recoup a lot...

    I'll try to dredge them up.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    6:38pm
    BTW - I don't vote Labor either..... or Greens or any other party....


    This is now what I was looking for, since it is a tax on financial institutions, but it is a good read:-

    https://www.ictu.ie/download/pdf/the_case_for_the_ftt.pdf
    David
    9th May 2018
    3:32pm
    Funding one's own retirement is a great idea - until the government comes along and effectively steals ones retirement savings..... and that after having stolen the pension savings assets conned out of them by same said government (7.5% of taxable income, a mandatory CON-tribution, supposedly towards a welfare fund, the substance of which said govt. stole and squandered squandered and then hid from the con-tributers.) Well done (NOT) Aussie Pollies, you greedy bastards....

    Before anyone thinks they might argue against these matters; check out the Hansard record, to determine the viability of my statement. If you can't be bothered doing that, don't argue....
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    3:40pm
    That's been done to death here and is no longer relevant.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    4:38pm
    Oh, it's relevant, OG, matter how many times it's said. It's relevant until the injustice is remedied. Everyone needs to know what the stinking government did and everyone needs to know how they are abusing senior Australians and how they are lying to get younger Australians to resent us.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    4:45pm
    Nay it's irrelevant now.
    Anonymous
    9th May 2018
    4:58pm
    Only an illiterate fool keeps making the same statement with no substance, no supporting data, and no logical supporting argument. Put as sock in it, OG. You are WRONG, and nearly everyone here knows it, and knows why you keep on with your BS.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    5:21pm
    Yes it is illogical to bring up the past and dwell upon on it when it not relevant at all.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    6:14pm
    Good post David. Only OG is not relevant. Need to go back to the parliament OG and rejoin your tribe.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    6:31pm
    Which one Mick? I have been kicked out of both majors and Greens are too stupid to have me so who's left?
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    8:15pm
    Come on OG. Please do not insult the intelligence of readers. You are posting right wing BS along Party lines and you are resorting to the anti Labor slagging devoid of details. What does that tell me?
    VeryCaringBigBear
    9th May 2018
    9:16pm
    That you Mick are trying to discredit OG by insulting him. Surely you know by now he thinks insults are great as it proves he is right.
    GeorgeM
    9th May 2018
    9:53pm
    Back to the main topic (not being about OG) - David, you are absolutely correct, we need to throw the whole lot of the current sitting Liberals, Labor & Greens self-serving leeches OUT!
    VeryCaringBigBear
    9th May 2018
    10:11pm
    Why hasn't Labor put it at the top of their agenda if they win the election? I can't see them repealing it as I believe they are actually applauding the LNP for doing their dirty work.
    TREBOR
    10th May 2018
    1:28am
    Labor don't want to fix things either - they're more interested in their big social movements rather than the overall well-being of the nation that supports those movements. It's a neat trick of only half strangling the goose that lays the golden eggs.... a tight wire act supported at both ends by you - the taxpayer.
    MICK
    10th May 2018
    8:43am
    I don't see this at all TREBOR. Tax cuts for the rich is not about 'social movements' of any sort. They are about a fair carve up of the national wealth rather than allowing the 1% to avoid taxes and own everything. Add to that blocking attempts to build rail links for Adano and doing something to give the Great Barrier Reef a fighting chance of survival and I see the beginnings of a government doing what it should doing: governing for all of us. You won't get that from the current rich man's government governing for.....wait for it....the rich.
    I am surprised that you view Labor in the light you do even allowing for the fact that both sides are tainted. There has to be a better of two evils choice we make or vote INdependent if you can find an Independent who is not a defacto Liberal Party stoolie.
    musicveg
    10th May 2018
    2:28pm
    Mick what do you think of Sustainable Australia Party? I don't want to vote Labor or Liberal, used to vote Green but they did a few things I disagreed with, have voted small minority parties and now am confused as ever?
    MICK
    10th May 2018
    7:09pm
    Had a quick read. Sounds ok. My only question is: is the Party a front for the Liberal Party or is it truly independent? I ask because one Nick Xenophon betrayed the country when he was heavily backed at the last election. The last thing we need is another shopfront for the current crooked lot.
    musicveg
    10th May 2018
    8:56pm
    Mick, I have no idea, all I know is Dick Smith backs them and joined and he has never joined a party before. How do we find out if they are truly independent? Nick X started out okay but then he succumbed
    to the political pressures of the day.
    Kathleen
    9th May 2018
    3:47pm
    Who thinks there are some people on here promoting LNP and either blatantly or sneakily electioneering on behalf of our present government? Maybe paid trolls? They are on Facebook so why not other sites like this? Beware and think for yourselves!
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    3:49pm
    I support neither Labor or the LNP myself but what I think is fair for everyone.
    libsareliars
    9th May 2018
    4:23pm
    "I support neither Labor or the LNP"

    Bwahahahahahaha! You are a blatant LNP spruiker.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    4:25pm
    No I vote for none of them as neither is worth voting for and has not been for many years now.
    Kathleen
    9th May 2018
    5:21pm
    libsareliars ... lol
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    6:17pm
    Spot on Kathleen. Easy to recognise the trolls. They debunk everything against their party, offer no facts and slander the other side. Good you see the posts for what they are: electioneering. Looks like an election is coming very shortly.
    Old Geezer
    9th May 2018
    6:33pm
    I agree it is very easy to recognise nearly everyone's place in society on this forum.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    10:31pm
    Yes -the real people and the self-promoted snobs..... easy as pie... I've mingled with some of these 'business giants' in the Eastern Suburbs of Sydney - peasants in Armani.... as much class as an Alan Bond..... talk like a wharfie and steal at every turn...
    MICK
    10th May 2018
    8:45am
    Wonderful observation TREBOR and spot on.
    GeorgeG
    9th May 2018
    7:00pm
    Shorten's proposal about franking credits seems almost dead in the water -it's not been thought through.
    But I will never forget Morrison's trickery and treachery in adjusting the assets tests taper rate January 1, 2017 - two months after I qualified for a part pension. As I recall it was a policy the government had looked at and rejected. But behind the scenes Morrison had meanwhile conned Di Natale. So I heard the news on the radio on the way to work one day. Not even a proposal but a done deal. And so many retirement plans went up in smoke.
    Shame on you Morrison. And to the many others effected, don't forget come election time.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    8:19pm
    What's a part pension. I am not even able to get a Health Care Card, compliments of the lying rat pack which now runs the nation.
    You are right in not trusting any of the swine. They will be gone shortly and are just in their death throws before they depart.
    I don't like Shorten but on the face of things he at the very least is not going to play the big end of town game where the 1% are kings and the rest are slaves. If he deviates from that theme I'm off to another country where the wealthy do not own the game (yet).
    Mad as Hell
    9th May 2018
    8:34pm
    I will never forget. I’m mad as hell and will never ever vote LNP or GREENS in any election be it Federal, State or local.
    Mad as Hell
    9th May 2018
    8:47pm
    Yeah not a fan of Labor. They spoke against changes to Pensioner Assets Test but have stated since they will not reverse the Pensioner Assets Test. Not a fan of the minor parties but they seem to be the best option.
    VeryCaringBigBear
    9th May 2018
    9:09pm
    Well if you think Labor is going to bring back the old assets test you are dreaming. I'm left wondering what Labor is really going to do as that non refund of franking credits is a red herring for something far more sinister. Saw some figures on the house being used to pay back the pension from one's estate and it brings in many multiples of what the franking policy will.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    9:19pm
    I'd be surprised if Labor acted against its heartland. What do you think would happen at the following election? Wipeout and not to be put into office for a decade or two.
    Labor will not do something so stupid so not sure who passed this bit of misinformation on the you.
    GeorgeM
    9th May 2018
    9:58pm
    I seriously hope no one forgets the treachery of the Liberals & Greens to hack the pensions of retiring & retired people with the bastardly changes to the Assets Test, with no mention of it now that they have dropped the Budget Emergency lie and have "rivers of gold". I wonder why people did not vote against them in droves in the last election - probably sleeping. Let's hope they are wide awake by now.
    Charlie
    9th May 2018
    10:28pm
    Just as surely as the Greens are not green, Labor is not the same anymore.
    Captain
    10th May 2018
    12:54pm
    George G, it was the Hockey budget of 2014 where the AssetTest was rejigged, however it was not implemented until January 2017.

    Nevertherless it was a blow for those 94,000 part pensioners who lost their pension and the 300,700 who received a lower pension.

    The savings from that rejig is $5billion over 5 years! Hardly a princely sum when a tax cut for Business is going to cost the Govt $50 billion a year, taxes of $65 billion not collected from 400 of the top Companies in Australia, $53 billion not to be collected from increasing the Medicare Levy by .05%.

    Labor will make the situation worse by creating two tax structures in Australia. Pensioners and workers will receive Tax Imputation Credits and SMSF Retirees will not receive theirs. A double whammy for SF Retirees.

    Who to vote for? None of the current load of shysters and none of any of the political parties.
    Captain
    10th May 2018
    1:04pm
    That should be 370,000 pensioners who received a lower pension.

    This affected those who actually their retirement and it was a deal between the LNP and Greens.
    Anonymous
    10th May 2018
    1:19pm
    The worst feature of the assets test change is that it does the exact OPPOSITE of what it was claimed to be designed to achieve. They said it was to save money, but how can you save money by creating a situation where people are better off saving less for retirement? It's patently stupid! Financial advisers are now telling people to save less, because they achieve a much higher income on a part pension. If the assets test were left alone, many would have remained on very low part pensions or even saved more and ended up with none, but now they are divesting to get a fair pension because they can't earn a decent return on investments.

    It wasn't a deal between Labor and Greens, Captain. Labor opposed - officially, at least. It was a deal between LNP and Greens. But Labor would not reverse it and are now pledging to totally destroy battling SFRs with a patently unfair franking credit policy that will wipe many of them out financially. How, exactly, does making the whole of society poorer help the budget? Affected SFRs will erode their savings to make up the losses, and reduce spending. That reduces growth and jobs and tax revenue, makes them more dependant on the government later on for health care etc., and reduces their capacity to pass wealth on to help their children and grandchildren achieve home ownership and savings for retirement. NOBODY WINS. When will the greedy idiots wake up to that fact?
    Captain
    10th May 2018
    1:51pm
    OGR, the last time I looked the LNP meant Liberals & Nationals, not Labor.

    You are correct in that polices from both major parties are disastrous for SMF Retirees. In the longer term their policies will push Self Funded Retirees into Government pensions quicker than expected, increasing pension expenditure and making younger workers wary of saving too much for their future as the rules may be changed at the Government's whim.
    Charlie
    9th May 2018
    8:20pm
    If they are going to have people working longer, they need healthy lifestyles ideas to "stay fit longer" They should stop calling it something to make people "live longer." The nursing homes are full of people who are living longer and not able to work.

    The two don't necessarily go together. The people who think up these ideas must be young, never had a sick day in their life and think dying is always a quick process.

    The incentive to encourage oldies to remain at work longer, is simply to encourage them not to draw their super. The high population of baby boomers retiring together, means a lot of money leaving investment circles. Australia's nest egg.

    A low interest loan for age pensioners does not benefit the average age pensioner. It only benefits the age pensioners who don't really need the age pension.

    Listings of part time and casual work rarely contain half-day work opportunities that would be suitable for the aged to boost their pension. Nothing happening there.

    What about the age pensioners who were working well before super was compulsory and before the size of the contribution went up. They retired with an amount of super that was too small to generate the basic wage in interest investment, so it was slowly eroded in living expenses.
    To retire early with health problems meant they could get stuck with money in the bank that reduced the Centrelink benefits they could get.

    Not a budget for the battler. Cant see any rent reductions or electricity price relief.

    9th May 2018
    8:51pm
    kathleen, libsareliars, tremor or is it labor mick to-day, h.s, george, mad as hell, thommo, is there anybody of you who thinks there are some people, maybe paid trolls, on here promoting labor and either are blatantly or sneakily electioneering on behalve of the former labor government, who could be so dumb to forget the absolute failures of labor under rudd and gillard, who could forget billy the knife stabbing not just one but two prime ministers in the back or could forget billy shortie as union chief selling his members out for thirty pieces of silver, at least judas did the right thing after his sell-out, I rather have a cup of coffee and an hamburger on the government's expense then to look my kids in the eye and tell them I voted labor!
    VeryCaringBigBear
    9th May 2018
    9:12pm
    Bill said they were sweekie clean on dual citizen issue so why did 4 of his mob resign today? Can you trust such a blatant story teller as PM? Trump will even disown him.
    MICK
    9th May 2018
    9:23pm
    You are a sick man heemsjerk!
    There is an old saying...'play the ball not the man'. Whilst I occasionally break this rule you'll generally see me reason a response. All you ever come up with is mudslinging. No facts. Only unsubstantiated venom. That is what trolls do!
    Personally I would hate to tell my kids that they will need to live in poverty all of their lives because I voted for what the top end of town had directed its government to do: bring back slavery for the masses and no taxes for the top 1%. Go for it jerk. I have a clear conscience.
    TREBOR
    9th May 2018
    10:35pm
    I was considering mentioning your name so as to draw you out, heemie... still the same old clap-trap.

    Not one word of contribution to the discussion there and not one word of truth - typical of your utter lack of knowledge other than pure trolling.

    You can't put a smart head on dumb shoulders.....
    MICK
    10th May 2018
    8:48am
    I suspect the words you were looking for were 'ill mannered ignorant oaf with nothing to say other than accusations and spew which have no facts to back them up'.
    Old Geezer
    10th May 2018
    9:43am
    heemskerk99 don't let their insult put you off. I love them myself as if someone insults me then it means I am right.
    Anonymous
    10th May 2018
    1:25pm
    OG, you and Heemskerk99 are a good pair. Living in la la land and fantasizing that your idiotic and nasty rants are correct, and that the responses from those you offend somehow proves it. WRONG! You are WRONG WRONG WRONG on every count.
    MICK
    10th May 2018
    7:12pm
    OG - you bring insults on yourself when you post propaganda with NO QUALIFICATION or facts. That is not a discussion. It is character assassination and propaganda.
    The issue is you are not right.
    musicveg
    10th May 2018
    12:29am
    Here is an example of some budget spending that we could have done without:
    The government has allocated $48.7 million over four years to commemorate the 250th anniversary of James Cook’s first voyage to Australia.
    https://www.businessinsider.com.au/federal-budget-2018-james-cook-anniversary-2018-5
    TREBOR
    10th May 2018
    1:35am
    Saw that on a petition..... always plenty more where that came from... what was that someone said about bread and circuses?

    Sports cops a fistful of dollars, so do a heap of other things.

    Been telling yez all for ages now that the entire gamut of government spending needs to be put under a PROPER microscope, without ideological bias like the Commission Of Idiots, and the full truth revealed of exactly what is necessary and what is not and what can be realistically afforded.

    Dang you learn some things reading historical books... the Japanese wanted to put a steel works in my GAIA region of WA in the early 1930's.... how come nobody noticed the iron ore there until Auld Lang spotted it? Some historical antecedents too in the vandalism of sinking a number of very fast destroyers with only seven easy years work on them by the Australian Government in the early 1930's as well, and the lack of interest in ship building..... somehow that last is ringing a bell to me right now.

    I'll expand on that later.......
    musicveg
    10th May 2018
    1:51am
    Books are interesting I agree, some doco's too, just watched the one about HItler being a drug addict, was high on meth a lot, crazy stuff.

    By the way, that James Cook anniversary spending is in the electoral of none other than Scott Morrison. He obviously does not have any concerns about how the Indigenous people of Australia feel about the "celebration" that he says is important.
    Adrianus
    10th May 2018
    11:43am
    music, its about time the indigenous people stopped carrying on about what Cook did or didn't do. Kevin Rudd apologised on behalf of Captain Cook so that should be it. Sweet Jesus???!!! How many times does Rudd need to say 'sorry' ???!!!
    Charlie
    10th May 2018
    3:03pm
    Yes the monuments need a lot of repair, after damage caused by activists promoting racial hatred and trying to use todays laws to get money from the government, for things that happened 100 years ago.
    Both the perpetrators and the victims of the alleged crime, are dead and the laws don't apply to that time anyway.

    Sometimes outrageous claims succeed. In 2004 aboriginal residents of palm island north Queensland, rioted and burnt down the police station because an aboriginal person died in custody.

    Last week 30 million dollars was awarded to approximately 400 palm island aboriginal residents, because the riot squad called in to stop the riot, was too rough on them. Police were also accused of being motivated by racism.
    Adrianus
    11th May 2018
    9:48am
    Charlie, I believe the Labor state government apologised again then.
    Just a word of warning to whites who are considering rioting. You will not get $75,000 each and an apology. You may however, get thrown in the lock up.
    Adrianus
    10th May 2018
    11:39am
    I have one thing in common with MICK, I am independent of party politics. I don't support any of the partys.
    Are we being fattened for the kill?
    Well we are not talking about live sheep exports here, we are talking about the lively hoods of hard working Australians, children, our aged and disabled.
    We could all do with some fat on us for the winter.

    10th May 2018
    1:29pm
    "labor mick or is it tremor to-day being independent of party politics", adrianus, we still can see the cheeky grin on your face even if you are trying to hide it by having your hands in front of your face, your joke is worthy of being in ylc funnies on friday
    MICK
    10th May 2018
    7:15pm
    OG? You posting under other personas?
    You have no credibility here other than your other right wing propaganda team. No one listening mate!
    MICK
    11th May 2018
    8:00am
    OG - you have been claiming that retirees are not going to get the dividend imputation refund for weeks. WRONG. I assume you heard Shorten put this one to bed last night. For other readers who were fooled into believing this it is good that their concerns have now been answered. Retirees not affected, as I maintained all along.
    Captain
    12th May 2018
    12:31pm
    Mick, is that all retirees will not be affected by the dividend imputation or pensioner retirees only, with self funded retirees still missing out?

    I missed Shorten's budget reply.

    11th May 2018
    12:45pm
    labor mick or is it tremor to-day, I recall labor's promise under gillard stating" there shall not be a carbon tax under labor's government" we all know the result or the rolled gold promise of billy the knife shorten no labor politician was of a foreign nationality, was not just one, four were thrown out, lying is labor's greatest and only asset and has been for over 50 years!!!!!!!
    GrayComputing
    11th May 2018
    7:42pm
    It is time for all of us to rant at our PMs daily to take action for human decency and a huge stress reduction for pensioners

    NO ASSET TEST FOR A PENSION EVERV AGAIN!
    A pension is not welfare.

    Most economist say we will save taxpayers money by dropping asset testing because of the massive overheads cost in running Centrelink and the 10,000 conflicting rules
    Even poorer New Zealand has a NO ASSET pension so it is cheaper and user friendly,

    Do retired and retiring people really look forward and want 100++ visits to/from Centrelink and be part of 3 million waiting queues and lost calls?

    Does your MP really like being part of the system that allows this indirect abuse of the elderly?

    This abuse is actually sponsored by our government and forced down to Centrelink and borders on a criminal act.

    Why do MPs normally compassionate persons let this Centrelink abuse happen at taxpayers’ expense?

    Some opposition and independent MPs stand to lose their chance at being part of the needed government changes

    We all need to tell our MP that these criminal asset tests for a pension must be dropped now.
    NO ASSET TEST FOR A PENSION EVER AGAIN!
    Radish
    14th May 2018
    4:16pm
    NZ has a GST on "everything"....I would not mind that if we all got a pension regardless of assets/income.

    So would others be happy to pay 15% on everything as well.?????

    14th May 2018
    6:21pm
    radish count me in
    KEVINJ
    15th May 2018
    3:39pm
    THIS is On "FB" & going ALL, over WEB, to DESTROY, MONGREL "AUS politicians".. Hearing Dr Lynham QLd,Speak,today15-5-'18, 2 G B ws Like Horrible Rave, from, il-legal,"ParachuTeD- I N-**Replacement", BEREJIKLIAN, Sydney **Of, DIS-GUSTING, EX-,PREMIER,- m. BAIRD, WHO -as "NAZI' type-Male, has CRIMINALLY Caused, Every1, to PAY "Out" OR,- Lose, their WealTH -(savings) on ELECTRicity- & GAS.. Doing It, to Me, & PWR CORRUPTED, BEREJIKLIAN- takg, Over 'As' like,-a Loony "CLover MOORE", means the 4 Pollies, PLUS, should have, Face PICS, HANGing, from PwR Pole Lines, AS EVIL Ppl were, IN old POLAND.. These TYPES of PPL -R, SO reviled, -AUSTralia Wide, &, the Writer IS, a RevoLTing VICTIM Of, "N.S.W, LIB Party GRAND, -CORRUPTION", IN, an, i l--legal, - Contrived, DIS-MISSAL as a SYDNEY, BUS DRIVER, UNDER the LUNATIC, E X,- N.S.W - PREMIER, {just 1 of, The WHole TOTAL},-I,E, JOHN -- ** FAHEY, --
    who **became a FED "Finance" "Minister"; -GOD, Save ALL - AUSTraLiaN CHilDReN, from, a FUTURE, Under, - these DecrePiD, LAW-LESS, - PPL;- a LAW, unto THEM,- HORRID- SELVES. With an AttacHED & EVIL SENSE, -of, ENTITLEMENT, like, TWIN "ROBBER", -BARRONS, RUDD
    &_ GILLARD, - SWAN, j. HOWARD, - E T C. -Neither, ever, - Employed PPL. - I am putting THIS, - ALL Over, the WEB, bec - EVery one of The MORONS - in Australian "par LIA -mnts", make me Sick. I will Vote for Independents.. AustraLiaN 'Politicians' ARE, -" H.I.T.L.E.R.S".
    PlanB
    15th Feb 2019
    10:48am
    With you 100 % KEVINJ

    Career politicians that have never done a days work in their lives absolute scum and oxygen thieves!

    AND THEY GOT THEIR UNI FREE ASWELL BLUDGERS THE LOT OF THEM!
    PlanB
    15th Feb 2019
    10:42am
    Are we being fattened up for the kill, YES WE ARE

    Anyone that believes this liar car salesman has rocks in their heads -- he is a real nasty dictator type and God help us if he Morrison gets in -- and yes he is yet ANOTHER religious nut case that has NO empathy at all -- Abbott another -- and there are many more there, I thought Christens were supposed to be caring people --Christ was supposed to be a caring person was he not!?
    musicveg
    15th Feb 2019
    2:10pm
    They are part of the elite who hide behind their so called religious convictions, all show. My mum and I used to go to church when I was a kid but we gave up because mum got sick of seeing the liars and cheaters there.
    PlanB
    15th Feb 2019
    3:49pm
    Yes Musicveg, so right IMO ALL religions are a rip off -- BTW I am not saying there is NO GOD or higher being because I do not know -- I am an Agnostic -- but it is the religions everyone of them that are the crooks and people that follow are being ripped off BIG time.
    Bruce
    16th Feb 2019
    12:18pm
    I really can't believe how many of you get it so wrong. Maybe that's why your still poor?
    If you pay too much tax. You claim a refund.to deny the refund is fraud and theft.. a shareholder is an individual.
    Like getting a payment for services provided.. labor has always kept the workers poor. While lying about it.
    alpal
    17th Feb 2019
    6:27pm
    Obviously they will go all the way for the kill. Would not trusty them AT ALL.


    Join YOURLifeChoices, it’s free

    • Receive our daily enewsletter
    • Enter competitions
    • Comment on articles