The notion of a secure and private home, a cornerstone of the Australian way of life, is under significant strain.
For many couples, the reality of renting has turned into a nightmare, far removed from the dream of peaceful domesticity.
This situation has been starkly illustrated by a recent incident where the lines between landlord and tenant were disturbingly blurred.
A startling image recently surfaced on social media, laying bare the dire situation faced by renters across the country.
The photo, which has since been deleted, depicted a ‘landlord’ sleeping on a thin mattress in the living room of a Melbourne apartment, a space that was supposed to be the private domain of the tenants.
The couple who resided in the apartment posted online to seek advice after their landlord, in an unexpected turn of events, moved back into the property they were renting.
Initially, the landlord had been staying in the second bedroom but later decided to rent it out to another couple and moved to a friend’s place.
Dissatisfied with that arrangement, the landlord returned to the apartment, claiming the living room floor as her bed and making regular use of the shared facilities like the TV and sofa.
This intrusion into the tenants’ living space is more than just an inconvenience; it’s a stark illustration of the power imbalance and desperation that characterises the current rental market in Australia.
The couple, bound by a flatmates contract, found themselves in a precarious position, uncertain of how to address the landlord’s ‘weird behaviour’ without jeopardising their living situation.
The internet was quick to respond, with many expressing outrage and offering advice. Some pointed out that the landlord’s actions might be unethical and also illegal, suggesting that the landlord was subletting the apartment to cover rent and possibly make a profit.

This practice, while not uncommon, often targets vulnerable groups such as poorer international students and working holiday visa holders who may not be fully aware of their rights.
Under the Residential Tenancies Act (1997), tenants are entitled to ‘quiet enjoyment’ of their premises, which includes reasonable peace, comfort, and privacy without undue interference from the landlord.
If these rights are violated, the landlord could face significant penalties. In Victoria, for example, breaching these terms could result in a fine of up to $1,975.90 for the 2024-25 financial year.
The rental vacancy data paints a grim picture, with the national vacancy rate plummeting to a mere one per cent in January. The number of homes available for rent across Australia has dramatically decreased from 47,336 to 31,822.
This shortage is exacerbated by factors such as population growth in major cities, a lack of affordable housing, and rising construction costs.
The photo of the landlord sleeping in the tenant’s living room is a symptom of a much larger issue.
It’s a visual representation of the extreme lengths people are going to secure housing in a market that is increasingly hostile to renters.
The Australian rental crisis is not just about economics; it’s about dignity, security, and the basic human need for a place to call home.
As we navigate these challenging times, it’s crucial for tenants to be aware of their rights and for policymakers to take decisive action to address the housing affordability crisis.
The situation calls for a multi-faceted approach, including increasing the supply of affordable housing, implementing fair rental regulations, and ensuring that existing laws are enforced to protect the rights of tenants.
If you or someone you know is facing similar issues with a landlord or rental situation, it’s important to seek advice from legal services or tenants’ unions. Remember, knowledge is power, especially when it comes to defending your right to a safe and peaceful home.
We invite our readers to share their experiences and thoughts on Australia’s rental crisis. Have you faced challenges in securing a rental property, or have you encountered landlords who have overstepped their bounds?
Also read: Tenants’ privacy breached 29 times, landlord fined for repeated intrusions