Innovative plan to ensure income for life

Font Size:

How your super is treated once you die has been scrutinised by the Actuaries Institute in its Retirement Income Review submission, along with a number of other shortfalls and inconsistencies in Australia’s retirement system.

The institute’s submission notes that when a person dies, the residual balance of his or her superannuation averages around one quarter to one third of the starting balance.

“This leakage to beneficiaries is an inefficiency of our superannuation system,” the institute wrote.

“Retirees can potentially achieve a higher standard of living if their entire superannuation balance is used to provide retirement income.”

According to the institute, there is a “real risk” that the Age Pension combined with an individual’s superannuation savings may not be sufficient to provide an adequate retirement income due to a combination of factors.

“These could include low contributions, insufficient investment returns, a reluctance to spend or because people live too long, outlasting their money,” it says.

Therefore, the group advocates the use of pooled products to offset longevity risk and ensure income for life. But such products are largely missing from the current retirement environment.

“At retirement, superannuation assets are not efficiently converted into retirement incomes due to a lack of risk pooling and over-reliance on account-based pensions,” it wrote.

The institute explains the problems of not pooling longevity risk.

“Consider 100 females who all retire at the same time at age 65. They all want a superannuation income of $10,000 per annum and to feel approximately certain that their savings can last as long as they live,” it says.

According to the institute, each female has a six per cent chance of living to 100. If they each want to be 94 per cent confident that their income can last for life, they need to ensure their income will last to age 100.

Assuming a zero per cent return on any investments, each would need $350,000 in savings at age 65. That’s $35,000,000 for the group.

Using Australian Life Tables (2015-17), 86 of the 100 females would live to age 80, 75 would live to age 85, 55 would live to age 90 and 26 would live to age 95.

So, if they work together as a group and pool their resources, each of the 100 females would need only $249,300 at age 65; therefore, to ensure their savings lasted a lifetime, the pool would only need to be $24,930,000.”

According to this and other modelling, retirement incomes could increase by around 15 to 30 per cent by combining an account-based pension with products that insure longevity risk, allowing retirees to “spend with confidence”.

“Pooling has the same effect as each person saving an additional 40 per cent in retirement savings,” says the institute.

However, it does acknowledge that this is simplified example of pooling and that, along with basis risk and the chance that lifetimes are shorter than assumed, there are downsides to such thinking.

“The downside is that when they invest, they are fully committing their savings towards the need for lifetime income.”

The institute says Australians need to develop a better understanding of retirement income policies and how much money they can expect to get in retirement.

“There is little evidence on the adequacy of retirement income in Australia because of a lack of good quality data,” the institute says. “Australians tend to underspend in retirement for fear they will outlive their money. Some retirees are net savers. But a lack of data means it is difficult to know if retirees have an adequate level of income.”

What do you think of the concept of pooling for longevity?

If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.

Join YourLifeChoices today
and get this free eBook!

Join
By joining YourLifeChoices you consent that you have read and agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

RELATED LINKS

Boosting confidence in retirement

Do you know how much you can ‘safely' spend in retirement? Accurium (part of the Chal

Australia’s biggest barrier for opportunity is age discrimination: report

Working later or retiring early? It's a choice taken away by age discrimination.

Knowledge is power in juggling your spending in retirement

Will you spend more in retirement than during your working life? Will your spending cha

Written by Leon Della Bosca

Leon Della Bosca is a voracious reader who loves words. You'll often find him spending time in galleries, writing, designing, painting, drawing, or photographing and documenting street art. He has a publishing and graphic design background and loves movies and music, but then, who doesn’t?

Contact:
LinkedIn
Email

27 Comments

Total Comments: 27
  1. 0
    0

    What a great idea…for communists.

  2. 0
    0

    So if you die young, your money stays in the pool for others. I would want a great pension indexed annually.

    • 0
      0

      That is very similar to the pension system in my old country, Switzerland. When one dies young one gets nothing and if one gets to 100 one has no problems, the money is available. My mother got $800 a week till she died last year at 95. Would not be popular here in Australia as there are no provision for kids’ inheritances like in our superannuation. You get an equal share as long as you live, no means or income tests. Mum filed her last tax return at 94, pension payment included.

    • 0
      0

      Exactly how the old defined benefit funds work. You save like crazy, pay full tax and hope you live a while after receiving the income stream because it’s lost to you once you take the regular income option.

      In Australia the means test deems the income as only 10% taxed regardless of the actual real amounts which is normally around 45%. It’s a rip off and I was amazed the Greens voted for it in Hockey’s budget.

  3. 0
    0

    What a great Idea. When everyone in the pool dies, the government gets it all. Also make it easier for gov. to get their hands on it,fewer hassles to deal with pooled resources than individuals.

  4. 0
    0

    There used to be terminating building societies with a notional term of 26 years which worked on the basis of all borrowers lasting the distance. As the average age of home ownership in NSW is about 7 years, a lot of the borrowers paid their loan out early and this had the effect of reducing the term of those borrowers remaining. I had a friend who was the last man standing and was advised by the building society that his loan was repaid 8 years early because all of the other borrowers had left.

    What has this to do with super you ask? Well, the funds remaining in the pool after each member dies should be adjusted to show an increase in super for the remaining members with the last woman standing copping the balance for her estate to disperse.

  5. 0
    0

    Where do you get these so-called “experts” from? Hopefully, no one will listen to them!

  6. 0
    0

    This might be a good idea for women assuming they live longer than their spouses but if they don’t their husbands miss out. If I go first my remaining super goes to my wife to make sure she is financially okay after my departure. If it was pooled she would be left with far less. We have our super split between us, both reverting to who ever is remaining. If we were both in pooled funds we’d both miss out. This might suit single people but few couples.

  7. 0
    0

    isn’t pooling risk what insurance companies are for? Sportsbet anyone?

  8. 0
    0

    Isn’t this effectively how annuities work, a set income for life from a managed pooled resource? So what’s new about this idea?
    If bigger contributors die young does this mean the smaller remaining contributors win the jackpot?

  9. 0
    0

    I would like to see what the administration costs would be before forming an opinion.

  10. 0
    0

    I would like to see what the administration costs would be before forming an opinion.

Load More Comments

FACEBOOK COMMENTS



SPONSORED LINKS

continue reading

Property

Small bedroom tips to maximise space and style

For many of us, house space is a fiercely contested commodity, and you need to squeeze the most out of...

COVID-19

Aussies much more willing to be vaccinated than Americans

The United States has had nearly as many COVID-19 cases as Australia has people. More than 400,000 have died of...

Stylewatch

Goldie Hawn at 75: The Hollywood star's fashion and beauty evolution

Goldie Hawn, one of Hollywood's most beloved stars, is famous as much for her acting talents as she is for...

Government

US still reels from the deadly consequences of 'alternative facts'

Jennifer S. Hunt, Australian National University Every four years on January 20, the US exercises a key tenet of democratic...

COVID-19

Tennis stars call Australian Open quarantine 'insane' and like prison

Entitled, pampered, whingers. Elite sports professionals victims of the greatest overreaction to COVID-19 in the world. Those are the poles...

Finance News

RBA reveals why retirees have to bear the brunt of low interest rates

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) knows that the negative consequences of low interest rates disproportionately affect retirees, but believes...

Diseases

Blood pressure medication helps even the frailest seniors live longer

Taking blood pressure medication as prescribed helps seniors aged 65 and over people live longer. And the healthiest older people...

Estate planning & wills

Common mistakes when writing your will

It can be daunting and even overwhelming at times, but writing your will is an essential part of planning for...

LOADING MORE ARTICLE...