Age Pension: Should deeming rates be re-adjusted?

Font Size:

Like many retirees, Karen believes that deeming rates are simply too high, especially when the money is being held by a nursing home.

•••

Q. Karen
What is the best avenue for protesting to the Government on the deeming rates? I am sick of the Government ripping everyone off!

I just put my 90-year-old dad in a nursing home and he had to sell his house to pay the RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) of $450,000. Then I discover the Government are deeming that $450,000 being held by the nursing home as dad’s income. Surely that is a rip off?

A. The deeming rate on savings for retirees receiving an Age Pension can be unfair. The banks are quick enough to cut their rates on term deposits, whereas the Government is less likely to react with a reduction in deeming rates.

However, with regard to refundable accommodation deposits (RADs), these are assessable when calculating aged care fees, but they are not included in means test assessments when determining eligibility for a means-tested pension from Centrelink or Veterans Affairs. RADs are exempt under both the assets and income tests.

You can ask for a review of a decision about your Centrelink payments by completing a review of decision form.

All content on YourLifeChoices website is of a general nature and has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. It has been prepared with due care but no guarantees are provided for the ongoing accuracy or relevance. Before making a decision based on this information, you should consider its appropriateness in regard to your own circumstances. You should seek professional advice from a financial planner, lawyer or tax agent in relation to any aspects that affect your financial and legal circumstances.

Join YourLifeChoices today
and get this free eBook!

Join
By joining YourLifeChoices you consent that you have read and agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

RELATED LINKS

Are you losing out to deeming rates?

Ray has questioned the method of applying deeming rates to shares.

Deeming rates in detail

Deeming rate thresholds will change from 1 July 2016

Deeming rules confusion

John believes many of the rules surrounding the changes to deeming rules are detrimental.

Written by Ben

43 Comments

Total Comments: 43
  1. 0
    0

    At current rates the $450K is deemed to be earning 3.17%pa but the highest rate you can earn on savings is 2.75% , so the government’s deeming rate is overestimated by 0.42%pa or $1,896.8 pa But, what if you had the $450K in shares earning 5% pa in dividends? Would you then consider your situation as rip-off? Not likely. Of course, the nursing home will not risk the $450K on shares so the best may get is 3% on term deposit. Do nursing homes pass this earning to compound the $450K or not? What do they do with the interest earned? Keep it for themselves?

    • 0
      0

      Deeming is unfair, but the assets test is more unfair. It ”deems” at 7.8%++. I cannot understand how anyone can be stupid enough to think that it’s good for the country to discourage saving for retirement and punish savers so harshly.

    • 0
      0

      It is not compounded Nursing homes keep it for themselves to make up the shortfall from the persons pension.
      On death or leaving the home you are supposed to get the S450k back.

    • 0
      0

      Nursing homes are built on borrowed money so your $450k bond is effectively earning what ever interest rate they are paying on their borrowings. Highly likely your bond is saving the nursing home more than the deeming rate in interest.

    • 0
      0

      Thanks for the information, Roby.

  2. 0
    0

    Of course it’s a rip-off. Colonel C’Link rules are always in the best interests of Colonel C’Link – not the ‘customer’. Imagine what it will be like if the clown show in Cambra ever hand it off to their ‘private enterprise’ mates. Then you’ll see the real cost of social security.

    Attacks on retirees must cease NOW!

  3. 0
    0

    Can anyone tell me what this RAD is for?

  4. 0
    0

    Of course its a rip-off. I am getting less than 2.5% interest but being deemed to earn 3.50% which means I am losing money every year, and that doesn’t include inflation. So I save money by spending it. Crazy that the government can’t see that. Because of the new asset test, my husband and I get less than the full pension.

    • 0
      0

      yeah, my wife and I get a small pension from NZ (approx. $35/month) and that has a marked effect on our Oz pension, C’link won’t let you have more than you should, by deducting that amount from our Oz age pension.

    • 0
      0

      @FrankC – cannot really understand that your $35/month makes a marked effect on your pension. I am getting $100/month from Europe and that makes no difference. You are supposed to be able to earn a couple of hundred a month, not so? C/Link sends me a yearly statement of the amount coming in $A currency.

    • 0
      0

      FrankC, you can have an income of $300 a fortnight per couple, plus you can earn from wages another $250 a fortnight each, without affecting your pension. It will affect your taxable income.

  5. 0
    0

    Again – no deeming rates if no assets test and everybody is eligible for a basic pension. Tax payable on income over the tax free threshold.

    • 0
      0

      That is exactly the way it should be and I believe it was the case 40
      plus years ago when I started working in Oz – when the Old Age Pension was a right and not called welfare. BTW: do the politicians call their pensions welfare?

    • 0
      0

      Thoughtful, for once I agree with you! The present rules are discriminatory and we will not be able to resolve the woes we’ll face in a few years unless we change direction. A tax payable on income over the tax free threshold system is desperately needed if we are to avoid becoming a nation of slobs and being drip fed by c’link!

      The fed governments cannot be so fickle; planning for retirement takes decades. I personally believe the current mob need to be voted out and the replacements will follow them unless they begin to listen to the people including self funded retirees.

      cheers

    • 0
      0

      That was exactly what Whitlam thought too and did back in the day. OF course he planned to pay for it by making all the mines, gas fields and uranium industry publicly owned rather than foreign corporations taking off with the loot. Couldn’t have that though could we?

      What a crazy idea that the people should have welfare, health and education services funded by the wealth of their own country.

    • 0
      0

      Quite right, Thoughtful and others supporting the idea of Universal Pension for all Individuals of say Age 65 and over with say 15 or 20 years Residence, with NO Tests for Assets, Income or Partners, etc. Just tax everything above that, with a concessional capped limit for Super income – to encourage savers.

      Unfortunately, the current mob of BOTH parties won’t do it – so only option is for all Retirees to vote them out by putting them (current seat-warmers) last in preferences. They need to lose their pensions / jobs to understand that retirees are angry and want action.

    • 0
      0

      But who do you vote for, George. They are all the same. And most of them have already secured their fat pension, so they won’t suffer any loss by being ousted. Their mates will take over and warm seats until they get a pension. Nobody wants to do anything constructive, and I doubt any of them have the brains to anyway.

      And then we have the problem that 95% of the population is unconscious. We are seeing them on forums all the time. ”Labor is better than LNP, so their policy must be right” or ”he’s got more than me, it’s not fair – take it off him”. Even ”too funny, LNP wanted to do it but Labor did it first” – never mind how harmful it is, much less that there’s no evidence to substantiate the claim. And then there are objections because some people actually want to debate the issue and uncover what’s really right and wrong – rather than blindly endorsing some useless greedy seat-warmer who lies every time his mouth moves – just because he wears a certain coloured shirt!

      Politicians are doing a brilliant job of dividing to conquer – convincing pensioners that SFRs are all rich tax cheats and the only way pensioners can have more is to steal the SFRs savings; convincing renters that homeowners are all wealthy and should get less; convincing workers that retirees are bleeding the nation dry and their generation ”had it easy” so it’s fair for them to suffer poverty in retirement… It just goes on an on and on and on and on. And sadly the 95% swallow whichever lies are most appealing to them, or are told by the party they like best.

    • 0
      0

      OGR, you are right to say “Politicians are doing a brilliant job of dividing to conquer”, as we can see from the highly divisive comments on this forum. However, you and I have agreed in another post that the Retirees group is large and can make a difference – if they join together for a good common goal – say Universal Pension.

      The question who to vote for arises often – each has to choose sensibly in their electorate to put at the 1st preference whoever agrees to change the system (to say Universal Pension), or if no one then vote for the most likely alternative to the current seat-warmer. They MUST also put the current seat-warmer LAST in preferences so they have no chance of getting your vote. At least in marginal electorates the large Retirees group could then throw out current seat-warmers. This may not achieve the end results initially, but is a first step to send a strong message that we (Retirees) won’t be ignored any more. Next election, adopt the same strategy – that way the next seat-warmer also gets thrown out if they don’t help.

      It is important for all to note that MPs need to have a minimum of 8 years in parliament to be eligible to get any pension – so by denying them that length of tenure, we have the stick by which we can beat them into shape!

    • 0
      0

      George, I wish there was someone worthy of a vote in my electorate. We have a moderately decent ALP member who doesn’t belong in a party that has no clue about economic management, a rotten-to-the-core arrogant LNP candidate who nobody in their right mind would vote for even if the LNP devised half-way acceptable policies tomorrow; a dumber-then-dumb and thoroughly useless Greenie, and a thoroughly brain-dead independent who wants to change the world by quadrupling the tax rate for anyone earning over $25,000 a year and tripling the rate of all pensions and benefits – oh, and confiscating ALL assets held by anyone over 65 to fund a universal age pension. Well, the UAP is a great idea, but NOT by confiscating everything people have worked a lifetime to acquire.

  6. 0
    0

    Some naughty people take their money out the bank and hide it under the mattress, then tell centrelink they are broke, the get the pension, they certainly are stinkers.

    • 0
      0

      Yes you can even buy mattresses with zippers now so you can access your money easy and even padlock it.

      Many old ladies have been know to take money out each week in cash walk across the road and deposit the money in their grand daughters account.

    • 0
      0

      Money in the mattress I once new a bloke who hid money in the mattress and let it be known, he was tortured and killed for it so probably not a good idea.

    • 0
      0

      Not so easy taking your money out of the bank, normally they need a reason for a withdrawal that would make mattress banking worthwhile. The old lady with the granddaughter is much more believable, know some of them myself. But remember – you have to trust your granddaughter, the account is hers and so is the money.

    • 0
      0

      Never even been asked if I take large amount of money out of the bank myself.

    • 0
      0

      The mattress bank returns better than the majority of investment available to retirees, and is safer than most that yield higher returns. Sad state of affairs when the absolute WORST thing you can do when planning retirement is have assets above a quite low limit.

      You can have a multi-million dollar home, but otherwise unless you are very rich, you’d best plan to be quite poor, because the stinking government will make sure you become poor fairly soon if you are not poor at retirement. And it seems like well over half the retired population are selfish enough to think that’s as it should be.

  7. 0
    0

    Thoughtful, for once I agree with you! The present rules are discriminatory and we will not be able to resolve the woes we’ll face in a few years unless we change direction. A tax payable on income over the tax free threshold system is desperately needed if we are to avoid becoming a nation of slobs and being drip fed by c’link!

    The fed governments cannot be so fickle; planning for retirement takes decades. I personally believe the current mob need to be voted out and the replacements will follow them unless they begin to listen to the people including self funded retirees.

    cheers

  8. 0
    0

    Trust a government of Lieberal scumbags to treat the elderly unfairly.

    • 0
      0

      And you think the ALP is less abusive? Dream on! They have just announced they will punish people for saving the government tens of thousands every year by stealing 30% of their income – NO MATTER HOW LOW THAT INCOME IT REALLY IS. But they will exempt PRIVILEGED PENSIONERS from their filthy act of theft, because they think the majority of unconscious who can’t think past ”it’s NOT FAIR for me to have less than him” are stupid enough to vote for destroying the nation by forcing everyone onto welfare.

      Sadly, they are right. The majority of unconscious are dumb enough to vote for destruction, as long as it LOOKS LIKE someone they THINK is wealthier is being ripped off to fund more handouts.

      What is really, really said is that so many selfish people expect support to demand higher pensions and more rent assistance and exemption of the family home from the assets test, etc. but when someone they are jealous of because they saved a few quid is being dealt an unfair blow, the greedy green-eyes cheer. No concern for fairness, much less what’s good for the nation. And certainly no interest in facts or truth, much less concern for the hurt some will suffer. As long as it’s not you being attacked, it’s all fine.

  9. 0
    0

    Dear PM MPs and senators

    It is time for you to take action for human decency and a huge stress reduction for pensioners

    NO ASSET TEST FOR A PENSION EVERV AGAIN!
    A pension is not welfare.

    For the retired and retiring people in your electorate do you think they really look forward and want 100++ visits to/from Centrelink and be part of 3 million waiting queues and lost calls?

    Most economist say we will save taxpayers money by dropping asset testing because of the massive overheads cost in running Centrelink and the 10,000 conflicting rules
    Even poorer New Zealand has a NO ASSET pension so it is cheaper and user friendly,

    Do you or other MP like being part of the system that allows this indirect abuse of the elderly?

    This abuse is actually sponsored by our government and forced down to Centrelink and borders on a criminal act.

    Why do you as a compassionate person let this Centrelink abuse happen at taxpayers’ expense?

    You even stand to lose your chance at directing the government unless all these criminal asset tests for a pension are dropped now.

    NO ASSET TEST FOR A PENSION EVER AGAIN!

    • 0
      0

      When Whitlam introduced a universal pension for the over 70s with no asset or income test we obviously thought it a bad idea because after the Elite staged that coup and dismissed him we voted him out and Fraser in. Fraser instantly stole the Welfare Fund and started the ball rolling to sell the country and all it’s assets and resources off.

      Spilt milk and yes you just have to clean up the mess and figure out how to make it through until you can milk the cow again.

      A Leader will balls could just Nationalise but the Elite would wage war. Still be better for our Grandkids. I like Sally. She reminds me of the fire Gough had for insisting the people would share in the wealth of our Nation rather than foreign owners and foreign governments.

      That a Communist Dictatorship with a New Emperor owns a good deal of our infrastructure, mines, farms and properties is an appalling result of poor governance from Fraser onwards.

    • 0
      0

      Quite right, GrayComputing, all need to maintain the rage from this bullying and attacks on retirees and vote them all out! Retirees don’t need Centrelink in their lives, and Universal Pension can resolve that with massive savings (from reduced Centrelink admin) to the Budget.

  10. 0
    0

    Deeming rates have been far too high for over 3 years now and there is NO way you are able to get the deeming rates on your savings — I have written to the Government and rung and have never had a reply — we also had a meeting in 2016 about such things and there were a LOT of people that were having their pensions cut because they were deemed to be getting a LOT more in interest than they were — all I can say is every on to ring/write and email the federal minister

    https://www.mhs.gov.au/contact

Load More Comments

FACEBOOK COMMENTS



SPONSORED LINKS

continue reading

COVID-19

Concerns over limited data on how vaccine will affect over-65s

There are growing concerns that the vaccine expected to be given to the majority of Australians when the rollout starts...

Nutrition

Making healthy eating more affordable

Eating a healthy diet is crucial to our mental and emotional health as well as our physical wellbeing. It can...

News

Hands up who's in the club that is wrecking the planet

Alex Baumann, Western Sydney University and Samuel Alexander, University of Melbourne Among the many hard truths exposed by COVID-19 is...

Stylewatch

The most iconic handbags of all time

While countless clothing trends have come and gone, certain handbags have remained desirable across the decades, as coveted now as...

Health news

Health check finds Australia is stressed and obese

One quarter (25.6 per cent) of Australians undergoing a health check have been identified as at risk of developing diabetes....

Finance News

Financial planning costly and complicated, say review submissions

A review of the financial advice sector seeking to cut red tape and provide affordable advice could lead to more...

Diseases

Types of polyps and what to do about them

Polyps are clumps of cells that grow inside your body. While most polyps aren't dangerous, some can develop into cancer....

Finance

How SMSFs invested in 2020 - and what this means for 2021

The size of the self managed super fund (SMSF) market now represents one-quarter of the Australian superannuation industry and sits...

LOADING MORE ARTICLE...