Experts explains long-term outlook for super earnings

Should Australians in retirement, or nearing retirement, be reappraising their income?

Long-term outlook for super earnings

As Australia awaits a government response on the Retirement Income Review handed to the treasurer last Friday and as estimates of super withdrawals under the COVID early release scheme are revised from $29.7 billion to $41.9 billion – the long-term outlook for super earnings is sobering.

Superannuation balances are looking much healthier than they were in March, but over the longer term, expectations have been lowered. Australians in retirement, or close to retirement, are – or should be – reappraising their income.

Super funds have averaged almost 8 per cent per annum over the past 30 years, which is nearly 5 per cent per annum above the long-term inflation rate. That performance has seen the average super fund account balance more than double in the past decade, says Selecting Super.

Kirsten Temple, manager of research at investment consulting firm JANA, offered the following insights on the long-term outlook to Nine media.

“The Reserve Bank of Australia’s decision to cut interest rates to a record low supports the economy and is great for mortgage holders but not for those relying on investment returns,” she says.

“You need only look at the interest rates paid on bank term deposits or the yield of bond funds to know that retirees will struggle to get much income from the more stable cash and bond components of their retirement pot.”

Ms Temple explains that low interest rates drive the price of growth assets, including shares, higher as investors who cannot achieve desired returns they need from cash and bonds shift up the risk curve.

“That creates share price competition,” she says. “When the price of an investment increases, the amount you need to invest to gain a suitable income stream or a share of future growth is higher. It works the same way with your super fund, too.”

She says the super system relies on an assumption that the value of contributions grows over time and that our investments will do some of the heavy lifting in building a nest egg.

But she says that with rates as low as they are, investment returns achieved over the nearly 30 years of the Super Guarantee are unlikely to continue.

“Super funds and their members now face a conundrum: continue to target the same historic returns knowing that it comes with higher risk – and a greater chance of funds failing to hit their objectives – or accept that the cost of retirement will need to be funded by additional current income from members.”

This is not just a problem for individuals, it is a problem for Australia, she says, due to the financial burden presented by the country’s ageing population on the Age Pension.

So, what should superannuation members do? Graham Hand, managing editor of investment site FirstLinks, says the first step is to be realistic.

For all the expert opinions, personal judgement is the final arbiter, he says.

“For extra security in retirement, instead of expecting 5 per cent above inflation … aim for closer to 2 per cent to 2.5 per cent.

“Planning should not be based on a short-term buying opportunity in the pandemic, but taking a longer-term view across many investment cycles.

“Shares are down only about 15 per cent and back to early 2019 levels. Markets are trading above their long-term price-to-earnings ratios, and are likely to produce relatively poor returns for at least a decade.”

He says that while the outlook affects all generations, baby boomers, who have already built their retirement savings, will need to watch their drawdown levels, as spending 5 per cent of a pension fund might erode capital quicker than expected.

Mr Hand says the potential for future tensions between retirees and the government is obvious. “Many people in older generations have benefitted from negative gearing, tax-free capital gains on their family homes, favourable property prices, strong stock and bond markets and lightly taxed savings in the form of superannuation,” he says. “The calls for increasing pensions, health and aged care spending also predominantly benefit retirees. The social contract between generations will be challenged.

“The reality is that return for risk payoffs are now lower … But de-risking involves a greater acceptance of a lower average return.

“The best way to minimise the impact is to ensure as much financial self-sufficiency as possible, which begins by not deluding ourselves about future returns.”

What measures have you taken to reassess your spending or expected spending in retirement?

If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.

RELATED ARTICLES





    COMMENTS

    To make a comment, please register or login
    BraveArrow
    31st Jul 2020
    3:42pm
    I am not surprised at the flurry of withdrawals from super from the younger generation as per article.
    IMHO although the superannuation funds have a huge amount of equity, the people benefitting are NOT the lower income contributors for the following reasons:-
    (1) the super funds fees /commissions are too high, approximately 2 -3 times the normal rate, and the ones benefitting are the financial advisors and the super funds;
    (2) most people change jobs many times in their working life and end up into multiple super funds, all paying fees and the trouble to consolidate into one fund may not be worth the effort, thus losing out.
    (3) the contribution to super should be not taxed (for the lower income bracket to a certain amount, say the average income in Australia ) and the employer super contribution should be ON TOP OF salary/wages, not deducted from wages.(Singapore is a good example).
    I am aware what I am saying may not be too popular to the companies and particular group of people who are making a mint out of the super system, where government changing policies create a myriad of complex financial systems which the average wage or salary earner is completely befuddled.
    older&wiser
    31st Jul 2020
    5:47pm
    A bit confused BraveArrow with your point 3. Not sure what you mean, because Super IS paid on top of salary/wages. It Is NOT deducted from wages.
    If your salary is $60,000, your total package is effectively $65,700. As the company pays $5700 a year into super ($60,000 x 9.5%). That is on top of your salary, not deducted.
    Ronin
    1st Aug 2020
    8:25am
    Totally agree with BraveArrow, with older&wiser’s caveat. The current Super system is not fit for purpose and is rorted by the Super Funds.

    It’s certainly better than nothing, but requires a major overhaul. A lower fee rate, lower tax rate for low to middle income earners and more transparency and easy to understand comparisons between funds would be a good start.
    Circum
    1st Aug 2020
    10:56pm
    Sorry but you pay fees per unit of wprk done.No freebies based on income.Cheeky bugger
    inextratime
    1st Aug 2020
    6:01pm
    Someone needs to look at the charges funds make ! Currently blind freddy could allocate funds as nothing is performing so why are the funds taking massive $ for poor performance.
    Time for intervention Mr.Morrison.


    Join YOURLifeChoices, it’s free

    • Receive our daily enewsletter
    • Enter competitions
    • Comment on articles