Government considering choice between super increase or pay rise

Font Size:

A proposed move by the Morrison government to offer workers a choice between a pay rise or an increase in their compulsory rate of superannuation has been slammed by industry groups.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported on Wednesday that the opt-in superannuation increase was one of a raft of proposals being considered by the government in a bid to manoeuvre its way around the looming legislated rise in the superannuation guarantee.

The compulsory rate of superannuation is 9.5 per cent but is scheduled to rise to 12 per cent by 2025, something that the Morrison government committed to before the last election. The next legislated increase is scheduled to occur from July.

However, the government is considering a model that would see workers given the choice to put more of the money into super, or to take the increase as a pay rise. The plan could include letting the super guarantee rise to 10 per cent and making the final 2 per cent optional.

Both the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) and Industry Super Australia (ISA) were heavily critical of the proposal, suggesting it would leave many Australian workers financially worse off.

AIST chief executive Eva Scheerlinck said the Morrison government seemed intent on undermining financial outcomes for Australians in retirement.

“Consumer research has repeatedly shown that Australians strongly support our compulsory super system rather than one which is opt in,” Ms Scheerlinck said.

“There is a broad understanding that unless we are compelled to save a portion of our wages, very few of us will have enough money for a financially secure retirement.”

Ms Scheerlinck explained that as the superannuation increases were incremental, it would result in very little extra cash if taken as a pay rise and the money would be eroded by additional income tax as well as losing out on the benefits of compounding interest on their savings.

“There are lots of ways to deal with low wage growth but forcing people to use their retirement savings to fund their own pay rise shouldn’t be one of them,” Ms Scheerlinck said.

“This is especially so for older workers on low incomes who can use super to top up the full age pension in retirement.

“The median super balances for 55-to-64 year olds are $183,000 for men and $118,600 for women, based on 2018 (latest available) Bureau of Statistics data. A balance of this size will add more than $100 to the $470 weekly income of a single pensioner.

“For older workers who are some years off retiring having an extra 2.5 per cent of their wages go into super will make it just that much easier to meet daily expenses and enjoy a quality retirement.”

ISA said the proposals would rip billions of dollars from the pockets of workers and deliver them to the government in the form of higher taxes.

According to ISA, up to two-thirds of a pay increase could be lost in higher taxes and reductions and other government support payments.

ISA chief executive Matthew Linden said the plan was underhanded and would force workers to pay for their own wage increase.

“Removing the guarantee in the super guarantee to make it ‘optional’ is a recipe for higher taxes, lower lifetime incomes, and a red tape nightmare for business,” Mr Linden said.

“The government should follow through in the legislated increase to 12 per cent and not be exploring underhanded ways to renege on it.

“This isn’t choice – it’s a sneaky tax grab that will leave people worse off and rip up one of the system’s founding principles.”

Would you prefer a choice between a pay rise or a super increase? Which one would you choose?

If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.

RELATED LINKS

Almost one million members in dud super funds, says APRA

Underperforming funds face legal action; 11 others flee the sector.

What to consider before switching super funds

The new year has arrived and now might be the time to consider switching super funds.

Controversial measure sees $36 billion 'sucked' from superannuation

More than 3 million Australians dug into super to dig themselves out of a COVID hole.

Written by Ben



SPONSORED LINKS

Sign-up to the YourLifeChoices Enewsletter

continue reading

COVID-19

Another vaccine ruled out as second blood clot case emerges

Australia's Therapeutic Goods Association (TGA) has announced that a second case of blood clots is believed to be linked to...

Superannuation News

Super funds fight for changes to reforms

Your Super, Your Future legislation will be enacted within three months and leading players are weighing in on the impact...

Finance

Ambulance costs around Australia

There should be no hesitation when you have to call an ambulance in an emergency situation, but some people rushed...

News

Four tell-tale signs that you may have a blood clot

A blood clot is a clump of cells and protein in your blood. Blood clots form to slow down bleeding...

Beef

Sweet Potato and Shredded Beef Bowl

When it comes to serving a lot of people, chilli is a miracle dish. You throw all the ingredients into...

Finance News

How much you can save on electricity in your home state

As we prepare to head into the colder winter months, there is good news for those worried about heating costs...

COVID-19

What is thrombocytopenia, and why did it stop the AstraZeneca jab?

Anthony Zulli, Victoria University; Maja Husaric, Victoria University; Maximilian de Courten, Victoria University, and Vasso Apostolopoulos, Victoria University Australia's medical...

Wellbeing

Ways to manage death anxiety

Winston Churchill once said: "Any man who says he is not afraid of death is a liar." But while it's...

LOADING MORE ARTICLE...