In the age of social media, a customer’s complaint can quickly become a public spectacle, inviting opinions from all corners of the internet.
Public opinion can be fickle sometimes. It may lean in a way that we least expect it.
This was precisely the case for an Adelaide mum who took to social media to voice her dismay after a dining experience went awry, only to find the court of public opinion wasn’t quite on her side.
The incident unfolded when the mother, identified as Ms. Barendregt, and her family were asked to leave a restaurant because her toddler wouldn’t stay seated.
According to her, the staff at Lemongrass Thai on Main Beach had warned her that her child needed to remain in his seat, despite the absence of a high chair.
The situation escalated when her son began playing with a decorative pot plant near another dining couple.
Ms. Barendregt’s video, which has since garnered over 1 million views, depicts her tearfully recounting the event.
She defended her son’s behaviour, stating he was ‘just minding his own business’ and not causing any damage. She felt the staff’s request was unreasonable, especially since her son was not being disruptive and would have sat down for the meal when it arrived.
However, the restaurant’s perspective, as shared by the daughter of the owners on Instagram, painted a different picture.
The establishment claimed that as the restaurant got busier, the child’s location near the entrance posed a safety hazard. They also alleged that Ms. Barendregt and her party left without paying for their drinks, a claim she refuted by questioning the logic of paying for a barely touched beverage.
‘They stood up, drank their alcohol and left without paying,’ the restaurant claims.
The response from the online community was swift and, to Ms. Barendregt’s surprise, largely in favour of the restaurant’s actions.
Many social media users emphasised the importance of supervising children in public spaces and respecting the environment and other patrons.
Comments ranged from critical to supportive, with some sympathising with the challenges of dining out with young children but others highlighting the need for parental responsibility.
One commenter said that some parents, ‘…really think that ‘it takes a village’ means ‘everyone must keep an eye on my kid except me while I have a drink.’
‘Kids are allowed to exist in public spaces, but we as parents need to show them how to respect public spaces. She can have him sit down or leave,’ another commenter said.
Some were sympathetic and defended her, with one saying, ‘These comments are wild. Children have the right to exist in the world and parents have the right to eat out just like every other paying customer.’
This story raises several talking points about the expectations of behaviour in public spaces, especially when it comes to children.
It’s a reminder that while families should feel welcome to enjoy dining out, there is a balance to be struck between the rights of the child and the rights of other customers and staff.
It also underscores the importance of clear communication and the provision of appropriate facilities, such as high chairs, to accommodate young families.
Moreover, the incident highlights the power of social media to amplify personal grievances and the unpredictable nature of public reaction.
While Ms. Barendregt sought support and perhaps vindication through her online post, the outcome was a mixed bag of empathy and criticism.
We understand that dining out with children can sometimes be a challenge. We encourage our readers to share their thoughts and experiences on this topic. Have you ever faced a similar situation?
How do you think restaurants should accommodate families with young children? And when it comes to sharing personal grievances online, where do you draw the line between seeking justice and airing dirty laundry? Join the conversation in the comments below and let’s discuss the etiquette of dining out with the family in today’s digital age.
Also read: Two Australian restaurants named among the best new spots worldwide
