In an age where technology permeates every aspect of our lives, it’s no surprise that Australians are turning to artificial intelligence (AI) for guidance on various topics, including politics.
However, as the federal election approaches, political figures and experts are raising red flags about the potential ethical implications of using AI to influence voting decisions.
The convenience of AI platforms like ChatGPT is undeniable. With a few keystrokes, voters can input their age, job title, and electorate to receive a list of candidates and even recommendations on whom to vote for.
This might seem like a helpful tool for those seeking more information, but experts warn that it could compromise the integrity of democracy.
Professor Mayowa Babalola, a specialist in business ethics at the University of Western Australia, expressed concerns about the overreliance on AI for such critical decisions.
‘If your decision is solely based on your interaction with AI, then you’re doing something that’s not right,’ he cautioned.
Voters echoed this sentiment, believing that personal values and informed choices should drive voting decisions, not algorithms.
The issue isn’t just about personal responsibility; it’s about the very nature of democracy. Democracy thrives on informed citizens actively participating in the electoral process, not on decisions outsourced to machines.
Former deputy prime minister Kim Beazley labelled the use of AI in voting as ‘undesirable,’ emphasising the importance of a direct connection between one’s thoughts and their vote.
‘I think people should keep close connection between brain and hand when voting and without other things coming in between both.’
WA Police Minister Paul Papalia also weighed in, highlighting the individual’s responsibility to educate themselves about the candidates and their platforms. This due diligence is crucial for making a decision that truly reflects one’s beliefs and the needs of their community.
While AI can be a helpful starting point, it’s not infallible. The algorithms behind these platforms are only as good as the data they’re fed, and they lack the human capacity for critical thinking and ethical judgment.
As Professor Babalola points out, without verification, it’s impossible to ensure that AI-provided information is accurate or unbiased.
So, what does this mean for Australian voters who may be more susceptible to misinformation or less familiar with the nuances of AI?
It’s a call to action to engage critically with the information at hand. AI can serve as a tool, but it should not replace personal research, discussions with peers, and engagement with the political process.
As we navigate the complexities of a digital world, it’s essential to remember that our votes are a powerful expression of our values and hopes for the future. Let’s not relinquish that power to algorithms. Instead, let’s use all the resources available to us, including AI, as aids—not substitutes—for our own well-considered choices.
We’d love to hear your thoughts on this topic. Have you ever used AI to help make a decision about voting? Do you think AI has a place in the political process? Share your experiences and opinions in the comments below, and let’s discuss the role of technology in our democracy.
