Young or old: Who are the big winners from Budget 2020?

Font Size:

It’s been a big year for federal Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, who has been tasked with keeping Australia afloat in unprecedented times.

So this budget, needless to say, was always going to be one of the most important budgets in the nation’s history.

Important in that it needed to be designed to cope with unprecedented government spending on welfare and on propping up businesses. Important in that it would show we could turn the proverbial poop into clay and mould a strong future.

It had the potential to be an actual game changer beyond that word being used as party rhetoric, one that could have steered the nation out of the pandemic and set us up for a future beyond a couple of big puddles and some new streetlights.

Instead, we got what The Guardian referred to as ‘the Afterpay budget’. That is, we buy debt now and pay it back later.

Sure, there are some good points and measures, but let’s start with you.

What’s in it for you?

Honestly, to answer that question, this could easily have been a two-word opinion piece.

Pensioners already know they didn’t get an Age Pension increase at the usual September indexation.

And to appease the masses of struggling pensioners deprived of their typical $3-$4 a week increase, the government spruiked that it would do something to help older Aussies cope with the increased costs of living in retirement.

And it did, in the form of two $250 payments – one in December and one in March 2021.

The cash payments totalling $500 will hit the bank accounts of around 5.1 million pensioners and eligible recipients.

Some will welcome this, and some will say it’s insulting.

But let’s do the maths on this.

If we divided that $500 by the weeks between now and 20 March 2021, when the next indexation occurs, pensioners would have had a weekly increase of around $16.

Not bad.

So, age pensioners could be considered winners of sorts.

Working older Australians, too, could be considered winners, especially if they fall into the high income tax bracket and will sup on the fruits of the government’s budget ‘centrepiece’ – fast-tracked tax cuts.

Just under 12 million Australians will like the tax cuts, especially the seven million or so who’ll get $2000 or more this year compared to the 2017-18 financial year.

The new changes mean upper income limits for the 19 per cent and 32.5 per cent brackets will increase from $37,000 to $45,000 per year and from $90,000 to $120,000 per year respectively and will be backdated to 1 July 2020.

If you ask the government, the tax cuts will somehow stimulate the economy and create 50,000 new jobs. If you ask 10 of Australia’s 49 leading economists, they might agree, but the remaining 39 are yet to be convinced.

And our friends at The Australia Institute have shown that investing $13 billion into services such as healthcare and education would have created 162,000 jobs across Australia – between seven and 12 times the number of jobs that are likely to be created by bringing forward the income tax cuts by a year.

Tax cuts only stimulate the economy if the money saved is then spent.

The real benefit of tax cuts for the government is political popularity, says political and economic journalist Ross Gittins, not pulling the country out of a recession.

And the only people who benefit are those who have jobs, says Australian Council of Social Service chief Dr Cassandra Goldie.

“People without paid work will see no benefit from the income tax cuts brought forward in today’s budget, which mainly go to people who are lucky enough to have jobs,” she said.

“The government will need to do more to ensure that we are all in the recovery together.”

Still, working older Australians may also be considered winners.

But, what of the myriad older Australians who have lost jobs, had heavily reduced hours and now make up the majority of JobSeeker recipients?

On the top line, the Morrison government has done nothing for them.

The JobMaker scheme focuses on getting young Australians a job. The cut-off age for the JobMaker Hiring Credit is 35. The $1.2 billion apprentice wage subsidy scheme also focuses on young people.

When asked why the JobMaker Hiring Credit scheme was capped at 35, Mr Frydenberg said: “We settled on 35, because young people have been particularly impacted by this crisis, and also because of the history of previous recessions in Australia; in the 1980s and `90s, it took a while for jobs to come back.”

It seems the Treasurer doesn’t believe older people have been sufficiently impacted by the crisis to warrant support.

There is no measure to create jobs or training support for older people. Not even a permanent increase to the JobSeeker payment they will now rely on until they are eligible for the Age Pension.

In all fairness, Senator Anne Ruston said there would be more announcements about this. Unemployed older Aussies wait with bated breath.

Council of the Ageing Australia (COTA) chief Ian Yates is concerned about this lack of support for older workers.

“They are often the first made redundant, they find it very hard after economic crises to get back into the workforce at a time when they’re trying to support themselves and pay for their retirement,” he said.

“So we are concerned that having supplements for supporting young people without a parallel for older people will price older workers out and make their task in the economic recovery even harder.”

In the meantime, they can go fund themselves by accessing their own super, right?

What about self-funded retirees? Did they come out with anything?

The short answer is no. Certainly nothing that inspires. But please, prove me wrong.

“Retirees who partly or fully fund their own retirement have suffered significant income reductions as a result of the adverse economic impact COVID-19,” said President of the Association of Independent Retirees Wayne Strandquist.

“These retirees rely on income from investments in the share market, property and fixed interest either through superannuation or private investment for their living expenses. They have been overlooked by the government as billions of dollars have been allocated to programs to stimulate employment and the economy.”

What else is in the budget for you?

There will be an additional 23,000 home care places over four years to help chip away at the 100,000-plus waiting list (remember, 30,000 people on that list died last year waiting for a care), $11.3 million will be spent on dementia services and another $10.3m on improving the aged care workforce.

“The Australian Government is spending $1.6 billion on 23,000 new Home Care Packages for the next four financial years,” said the Combined Pensioners and Superannuants Association, which called the budget a “disappointing one for older people”.

“This will bring the total number of available packages to 188,000. Unfortunately, the number of people without packages is around 59,000. This means that, based on current figures, 36,000 people assessed as needing care will remain without it in four years’ time.”

Even superannuation reforms will only help younger people. Workers who switch jobs will now have their fund follow them to their new job, and a comparison tool will help members find the best fund for their needs.

Women, who have been most affected by the pandemic according to the statistics, will gain very little.

People who have lost their homes will join an ever-increasing wait list for public housing, and that list looks set to lengthen, with no mention of investment in public housing.

Investment in social housing would have killed two birds with one stone – delivering high-efficiency homes and creating desperately needed jobs for young and old.  

“Our pre-Budget submission proposal, the Social Housing Acceleration and Renovation Program (SHARP), would have delivered 30,000 high quality energy-efficient homes for people in need, and secured great jobs for thousands in regions and towns across Australia.” said Community Housing Industry Association chief Wendy Hayhurst.

On a side note, the majority of those 49 leading economists referred to earlier said that increasing the JobSeeker payment by $40 a day and creating more public housing were the two items at the top of their Budget wishlists. Neither eventuated.  

Overall, the Budget does a little bit for a few, looks after businesses and those with a job, will create jobs for younger people, assuming businesses spend on employees and don’t pocket their gains and will give an ailing economy a jab in the arm. But, many fear, it will not do nearly enough to get us out of the hole we’re in.

But let’s end this on a positive note. Should we have a vaccine in 2021 and should everything go to plan and, as Adam Creighton writes, because it is a ‘self-imposed recession’, we could quickly bounce back once restrictions are lifted and confidence returns.

What do you think of the budget? Are you happy about the $500 handout? Has the government done enough to support you? Do you think it is a responsible budget?

If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.

Join YourLifeChoices today
and get this free eBook!

By joining YourLifeChoices you consent that you have read and agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy


JobSeeker declared the new ‘pre-Age Pension’ payment

More older people than ever on JobSeeker payments, says budget office.

Government announces it is cutting capital gains tax for granny flats

Government announces capital gains tax incentives in a bid to prevent elder abuse.

Written by Leon Della Bosca

Leon Della Bosca is a voracious reader who loves words. You'll often find him spending time in galleries, writing, designing, painting, drawing, or photographing and documenting street art. He has a publishing and graphic design background and loves movies and music, but then, who doesn’t?



Total Comments: 45
  1. 0

    This is an election budget, full of promises and short on real action. Its likely to fall apart if further health issues related to Covid19 occur. Business will take all it can get, keep as much as possible, employ as few casual workers as they can get away with, and pay as little as possible. Most people, if they have any commonsense, will save any gains to prepare for future lean times ahead. $500 per pensioner or others who qualify becomes less than $10 per week, equivalent to 2 cups of coffee or a schooner of beer. How insulting to we senior Australians. Ho hum, more of the same from a tired and worn out LNP government.

    • 0

      at least you get the $500, others get zip.

      I disagree the LNP government is tired and worn out; it is just as strong on neocon ideology today as it was in 2014 despite its temporary dive into Keynesian economics.

    • 0

      Sorry to go off topic so early in the piece, Buggsie, but it is insulting to us senior Australians NOT to we senior Australians. You would say: ‘It is insulting to us’ NOT ‘It is insulting to we’. The end bit doesn’t make any difference. BTW, I think it is insulting too.

  2. 0

    The article says:
    “There will be an additional 23,000 home care places over four years to help chip away at the 100,000-plus waiting list (remember, 30,000 people on that list died last year waiting for a care)”
    That’s the way governments operate, red tape and lengthy wait, hoping you’ll be 6 feet under before they have to act!

    • 0

      There are actually 130,000 people waiting on packages as of September this year. Most will die before sufficient funding is made available for an adequate supply of appropriate packages. The LNP govt priority seems to be to fund privately owned nursing homes operated by the old boys network and generating profits for the well off, rather than supporting people who want to remain in their own homes with family or other support.

    • 0

      I agree Buggsie, but the two main parties are a different side of the same coin, I wouldn’t expect any better from labor!

    • 0

      Buggsie has hit it spot on. And all parties are as bad as one another. In to rape and pillage until they get dumped and then make out like Riley on their generous retirement packages and get work from those who they have helped while in ‘power’.

  3. 0

    it doesn’t matter what the government does greeedy Aussies will want more. It doesn’t matter if you vote Liberal or Labor any more, its the same stupid insane policies. Might as well get a helicopter and fly over the country dropping money. If you include State Government debt, total government debt is now about $2T. Who cares – no one. No reward for working hard!! If you keep rewarding stupidity you’ll get more or it in spades!! Whatever happened to tolerance, respect and humility?

  4. 0

    Meanwhile farmers are plowing in fruit and veg crops because they can’t get enough pickers, despite the high wages being offered. What’s wrong with a work for the dole scheme to get those on Job Seeker to actually earn it and actually help the economy at the same timed. Too logical I guess.

    • 0

      Mikko, do you have an example of the high wages being offered to entice seasonal pickers? I am aware some farmers have few problems harvesting their crops so what is different about the other farms?

    • 0

      The proper farms supply decent accommodation, have families on farm and pay between $25 and $28 an hour.

      Where my son worked Danish students came every year telling their friends about it and had a great time.

      It’s the logistics and job providers do not find jobs. The labour hire firms need to organise locals the same they did for backpackers.

  5. 0

    Self funded Retirees have really suffered this year my super pension has taken a nose dive but that is to be expected, my fault for not living the good life instead of working hard.

    • 0

      Totally agree. It does’t pay to be a responsible citizen in Australia.

    • 0

      Yes it’s annoying we saved when others spent and get no support. You should check out Centrelink though as you may be eligible for some help it never hurts to ask.

    • 0

      Rae – some people just do not want Centrelink involved because they do not want to be called welfare recipients. We were not called that when starting work at 16. They were old age pensioners and we were promised that pension at 65 for men and 60 for women and no asset or means test. Was all changed in the 80s when superannuation was started. Still some oldies rather go without than having to approach “welfare”. I just got used to it and naming me a welfare recipient makes no difference to me. I have more spending money than some SFR mates. To each his/her own.

  6. 0

    As usual the LNP has left out certain sections of the community who are also the most vulnerable and we need to ask WHY? Why leave out older workers who can’t get jobs? If in your earlier working life you needed to pay off a house, put children through school etc. etc. and planned to fast-track superannuation later in life when you could more appropriately afford to, how can they now do that if they have lost their jobs? Not to mention those couples who left it too late in life to get out of the intolerable relationships they were in. There is no time left to save and get ahead before retirement. This Govt just plays the blame game and do not take ‘life’ into account. They only want to look good to the wealthy who put them in power.

    • 0

      You mean ‘life happens’ Hardworker. Well tough. Super is a life long proposition and meant to be contributed to from the first day of your working life. Adding an extra $5-10 a week (yes forgo a couple of beers or coffees) adds up over a lifetime. When did retirement savings become a Government responsibility?

      For generations people were in relationships, had children, put them through school, bought homes and ran a budget to do so. And guess what, people got divorced or partners died too. What makes this generation any different? When did relationship issues become a Government responsibility?

      We can all parade the life events we have already lived but ultimately we are all responsibile for ourselves. Government aid and welfare should not be a lifestyle choice but a genuine safety net for those genuinely unable to help themselves. That means get those under 35s (or indeed anyone who wants to go at any age) out into farms picking fruit now adding to their super now, working now.

    • 0

      Agree with you KSS.Life happens.However not sure about the fruit picking alternative.As a youngster I tried that with a few Uni mates.After half a days work I filled up my large wooden crate worth $7 to me.Then a union guy comes arrives and says Ok anyone who wants to continue working needs to join up with the union,Thats $12 thanks.Some quick maths told me thats $2 net I would make for the day.So that was my first and last time pear picking.

    • 0

      KSS why don’t you read comments properly instead of going off on your own little tangent. We’re talking about the OLDER generation, not THIS generation. I too put money aside in Super even though I was doing it tough. Yes there are those who do not spend wisely but there are also others who try hard but get a lot of hard knocks in life with ill health, job losses and business failures etc. I am anything but religious but you have no compassion and no understanding. And as for fruit picking it’s not as simple as it sounds. No appropriate accommodation, lousy pay, sometimes back-breaking work, unwanted attention to females by sleazy males and some fruit picking groups controlled by the Mafia. This information comes from people I know who have been there, done that.

    • 0

      And yet Hardworker, those farm jobs are good enough for visiting backpackers year after year while Austrlians, fit and hrealthy turn their noses up because it is all too hard! Get real Hardworker.

    • 0

      KSS, I agree with much of what you say, but the government has declared that responsibility and self-sufficiency are evil and to be punished and has apparently decided that everyone should be poor and dependant in old age. It’s not that the population has randomly decided to be irresponsible – but rather that they have been forced to recognize that work and saving doesn’t pay, but squealing for handouts does. And Labor is worse than LNP when it comes to rewarding irresponsible lifestyles and punishing workers and savers.

      As for those farm jobs being good enough for visiting backpackers – well, yes, since it’s a way for them to see the world and many have other income or wealthy families anyway so the money they earn is only for daily expenses. Aussies may well have nothing else, and no future, and frankly, I don’t see why they should work for peanuts in often appalling conditions when they will suffer penalty for earning and certainly harsh penalty for saving or investing to improve their circumstances. Once again, it’s the government to blame. I know plenty who rejected work opportunities because working didn’t benefit them. By the time they cover travel costs, work clothing and lunches, and other incidentals, they are far better off at home on Newstart selling some home grown plants or craftwork for cash. Or, better still, do as many do and figure a way to claim disability (mental illness is easy enough to fake, it seems!).

      We have to stop this crazy idea that welfare is a safety net, because that just encourages people to be or appear needy so they access it, and discourages endeavour that, for many, will never pay off.

  7. 0

    This is a typical response to be expected from this site. One BIG whinge from beginning to end.

    “It seems the Treasurer doesn’t believe older people have been sufficiently impacted by the crisis to warrant support.” And where does this come from? Day after day, week after week on this site people have been saying that the ‘young’ need help to get jobs, education, homes. Well now they have the opportunities being provided and still this writer whinges and whines.

    And lets not get lost in the mire and grabby hands still out for more. Yes those older people most affected are the self-funded retirees. They have NOT received the extra $2000 handouts and on top of that their investments have declined to levels where their income may well be less than the age pension. Yes they can sell assets and yes they may own their home but to think they have not suffered is quite wrong. They are in many ways worse off than those on the age pension. The way to help them is not throw money at them. Its to get people back into jobs and get the economy back on track. And then there is the usual confusing of State and Federal responsibilities. Whinging about social housing is not a Federal issue. The States and local councils have thet responsibility!

    And one more thing, the debt being incurred is unprecidented. The saving factor is that money borrowed now to pay for all this is also at unprecidented low interest levels and those levels are locked in at today’s rates. This and because Australia was in a reasonably good position going into the pandemic, means that Australia is doing far better than other comparable countries and has an opportunity to rebound quickly.

    Yes there still needs to be proper reform of the entire tax system, health and aged care, child care, education and anything else you care to mention, but now is not the time to tackle all these things at once.

    • 0

      KSS, you’re wrong about social housing. The States have responsibility, but joint funding has always come from the Federal Government. Over time, the Fderal Government has reduced their share. An increase in money for social housing, would have assisted the economy by more,jobs and helped the homeless including older women

    • 0

      And states have sold off housing stock and not replaced it!

    • 0

      Thanks for your insightful comments KSS. I’m wondering. Are you on an Age Pension? Are you over 55 and out of a job? Do you own your home?

    • 0

      KSS, it seems you live in a different world to many. Consider for a moment those who have built this country and contributed their whole lives.
      Some were even still working part time to fund their retirement, often forgoing part of the OAP. For many this was to help in paying off mortgages so not to add more people to the accommodation crisis.
      Then Wham! COVID hits and they get laid off. Centrelink says no, you are at pension age, so you can’t get JobSeeker, you’re automatically on OAP. And feel good you’re supported.
      If you were a business, you could claim back your losses, but as a pensioner, you can’t claim back the taxes you’ve paid, even though you’ve now been dumped in a heap.
      The politicians are pitting groups of Australians against each other the way any ‘successful’ despot does, so now let’s look at how we politicians can take more off you. They signed the Lima Agreement to make Australia poorer and they are hell-bent on doing so. Sad to see they have so many naïve supporters. Your time will come. They’ll wipe out group by group until the remaining few are just like them.

  8. 0

    seems to depend upon whom are the “older people” when YLC states “It seems older people were sufficiently affected to warrant the treasurer’s support.”

    • 0

      Farside, you need to get the glasses on mate.
      Or do you suffer from selective vision?

      YLC actually states, in Para 33,
      “It seems the Treasurer doesn’t believe older people have been sufficiently impacted by the crisis to warrant support”
      which has the complete opposite meaning of what you accuse them of stating.

    • 0

      Hawkeye, scroll to the top of the page and read the sub-headline. It’s in large enough typeface so you will not need glasses. I simply cut and paste the YLC statement.

  9. 0

    And thus ends the sermon from Father KSS.

  10. 0

    once again a lot of self funded retires are worse of then pensioners so what did they get a big fat OOO. self funded retires should get the same discounts on there rates ect that pensioners get so thank you Mr treasurer for giving me nothing and letting me live on an equivalent amount as the age pensioner without the benefits.

    • 0

      Totally agree. As I am a self funded retiree also I get absolutely 0. The government doesn’t reward good behavior and personal responsibility. When are kids going to be taught life skills.

    • 0

      Big Al ,The government is teaching kids life skills.By observation kids are learning to not save too much (Josh rubs his hands ),enjoy life while they can and that the government will assist them as long as they havent saved too much

    • 0

      Never be self funded as it defeats the purpose. Better having a good life spending during your productive years and then take as much as you can in your declining years. THAT is the lesson the young are learning from our behavior today. I am glad I stopped work in my 50s.

    • 0

      Yes, but the stupid politicians still think they save money by being mean and cruel. They are in for a shock as more of the aged population wakes up and fewer and fewer retire with savings.

Load More Comments



continue reading

Health news

Doctors call for convicted child killer Kathleen Folbigg's release

A group of 90 expert scientists and doctors is calling for convicted child killer Kathleen Folbigg to be pardoned in...


Adorable celebrity pets

Just like the rest of us, Hollywood's A-listers are pretty obsessed with their pets, especially when it comes to sharing...

Health news

Who needs a colonoscopy most? Ensuring those at risk head the queue

Professor Jon Emery Mary was 55 when she started having on and off tummy pains, and noticed she needed to...

Health & Ageing

What stress does to your skin, hair and nails

Stress can be an all-consuming beast. Not only does it overwhelm your brain, but it can have a physical impact,...


Multi-generational family living grows, forcing design changes

The trend towards multi-generational living, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, is producing fresh approaches to Australian housing. Urban designer Craig...

Seniors Finance

Your retirement 'pay cheque'

Nothing beats the reassurance of knowing there's money coming in each month. Then retirement happens and, suddenly, it's up to...

Health news

Scientists closer to developing a vaccine for urinary tract infections

Anyone who has ever developed a urinary tract infection (UTI) knows that it can be painful, pesky and persistent, but...


Alarming spike in elder abuse during pandemic

A frightening rise in elder abuse during the pandemic is being reported across Australia. And some of the perpetrators are...