Anti-poverty group urges rethink of vehicle insurance to increase fairness.
The owners of 2.3 million uninsured vehicles in Australia risk the cost of accidents that many of them can’t afford, while insured motorists pay a total of $1.3 billion more for their coverage than they would if all were insured, according to a new Brotherhood of St Laurence report.
The report, titled Pranged: the real cost of optional vehicle insurance in Australia, says the main reason motorists give for being uninsured is the cost, and that Australians on low incomes are less likely to insure their vehicles.
“We need to rethink Australian motor insurance,” said Tony Robinson, the Financial Inclusion Senior Manager of the Brotherhood, a national anti-poverty group.
“However, mandatory insurance is not the answer as it will punish poor people. This new report aims to spur public discussion on how to improve the current system, and sets out some steps towards this.
“Many can’t afford to insure their vehicles yet are dependent on them for daily living, particularly in outer suburban and regional areas where housing costs less but public transport is scarce or non-existent. Yet accidents can incur repair costs that are financially crippling – for insured cars the average insurance claim is $3000.”
The report says there is also confusion about what is included in the compulsory third party insurance paid with car registration.
Some mistakenly think that it includes damage to other cars or property.
However, state governments mandate compulsory third party insurance only for personal injury or death, while insuring for damage to cars or other property is left up to the owner - either comprehensive insurance or cheaper third party property policies.
It says motorists who take out insurance pay more in order to cover the risk of loss arising from accidents caused by vehicle owners who are uninsured, whether that is through choice or an inability to afford insurance. Insured motorists pay $1.3 billion more for their coverage than they would if vehicle insurance were universal.
The report outlines the steps towards a better system.
- Insurers run an awareness campaign about the need to buy property cover separately as it’s not covered by compulsory third party insurance. This would encourage uninsured drivers who can afford coverage to buy it.
- State governments make policies more affordable for people on low incomes by considering removing stamp duty from vehicle insurance policies developed by insurers for low-income drivers.
- State governments consider tribunals as alternatives to courts to resolve vehicle accident disputes. One model is New Zealand’s Dispute Tribunal where insurance disputes and other matters are heard by an accredited referee whose decision can be enforced by a court.
- Some third party property insurance policies include an Uninsured Motorist Extension (UME), which provides some protection if the driver’s vehicle is damaged by an uninsured motorist who is unable to pay. Standardising the UME in third party property policies to cover $5000 in damages would benefit low-income Australians who cannot afford comprehensive cover. If insurers are not willing to do this, the Australian Government should consider mandating that standard.
What do you think? What would you do to make car insurance more affordable for people on fixed incomes? Do you have car insurance? Do you think it should be compulsory?