Pipe bomb in Parliament

Font Size:

Yesterday Senator Bill Heffernan brought a homemade pipe bomb into Parliament. It was a fake, but he presented it to the Parliament in order to make the point that the new security screening arrangements at Parliament House are flawed. A week ago the arrangements were changed to allow most staff, including politicians, to enter Parliament House without first going through a security screening.

The justification is that senators and their staff have already undergone police checks, however, Senator Heffernan is arguing that any one of those staff members could potentially be blackmailed into brining something dangerous, such as explosives, into Parliament, with security now none the wiser.

Police commissioner Tony Negus said he was warned about the stunt beforehand, and admitted to being unhappy with the new security arrangements.

The controversial security trial has partly been caused by budget pressures on the Department of Parliamentary Services, which funds the security at Parliament House. Senate clerk Rosemary Laing expressed her frustration this morning at the funding cuts. “You know, you cannot let the national Parliament dwindle into insignificance by starving it of funding. It’s simply an unsustainable and impossible situation. The Parliament is an arm of Government, established under the Constitution along with the Executive Government and the Judiciary. I mean, to think that any of those arms of government is effectively crippled through starvation of funds is unacceptable.”

To find out more, visit the ABC News website. 

Opinion: It only takes one

No, it wasn’t an unhappy student taking the protests a step too far. It wasn’t a pensioner facing a future of reduced pension payments, or a single mother of four whose taxes could go up by as much as 10 per cent because of the budget. It was a senator who brought a pipe bomb into Parliament yesterday, along with some homemade dynamite and some frightening suggestions on what could be brought into Parliament through the new security arrangements if someone had the patience to transport weapons components in over a few weeks.

All of the explosives he produced were fake (and it’s difficult not to picture Senator Heffernan sitting in his loungeroom gluing what appears to be a telephone cord to a metal pipe while watching MasterChef), but they still served to make a very strong point. It’s not that he, or those unhappy with the new security arrangements, expect everyone to start bringing weapons into Parliament House. The warning is simply this: it only takes one. No matter how upstanding an institution may be, there will always be pockets of corruption and people who do the wrong thing. No institution is immune – the Government has seen its fair share of scandal in the past year alone, the church is undergoing a major inquiry and a former police detective is on the run right now.

These instances show us that no matter how much we trust an institution to do the right thing, we should not trust a person simply because of their association with that institution. In past terrorist attacks, it is individuals who have done the wrong thing, and while they may be few and far between, it only takes one to wreak havoc on the lives of innocent bystanders.

Choosing not to perform a simple security scan on senators and their staff as a way to cut costs is not only unnecessary, it is downright dangerous. But perhaps it shows how little even the Government feels we need our national leaders if they are prepared to put the lives of everyone in the Parliament at risk just to save a few bucks. Remember, it only takes one, and with how angry Australians are over the latest budget it seems crazy that the Government is reducing security, rather than increasing it.

What do you think? Do you agree with the way Senator Heffernan made his point? Should the Government seriously reconsider cutting security costs, or are security scans at Parliament House just a waste of taxpayer money? 

Join YourLifeChoices today
and get this free eBook!

By joining YourLifeChoices you consent that you have read and agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy


Total Comments: 26
  1. 0

    Does anyone remember the saying “Who was the only honest man to enter parliament in England”? Answer Guy Fawkes.

  2. 0

    Well I guess a Senator taking a ‘bomb’ in is better than a terrorist and if it does highlight holes in security then action is necessary. Don’t agree with Guy Fawkes being the only honest man to enter Englands parliament. He was a religious terrorist who was part of a plot to remove a protestant King and replace him with a catholic one – same sort of thing islamic terrorists are trying to do nowadays

  3. 0


    “Oh, look we have had the budget cuts inflicted upon us also,” – “We are now in danger”
    Security has not changed one bit – as if !

    • 0

      Remember the chemical factory fire within sight of Parliament House during the Gillard Government –
      There was all sorts of speculation –
      It was said that it was deliberate –
      That it was set within the sight if Parliament House –
      That it was to send a strong message to Canberra & the Gillard Government.


      In fact it was just the usual run of the mill fire due to carelessness etc.

    • 0

      Or are we being PREPED for something like a America –
      How Are We Going To Demolish 3 Towers Riddled with Asbestos That At about To Fall Down Due To Shonky Building In The Cheapest & Easiest Way –

    • 0

      book :- BLUR MURDER
      author :- our very own BEN HILLS, who did a lot of leg work & research to get this book together.

    • 0

      BLUE MURDER sorry 1

    • 0

      I take Deadly Nightshade Seriously too I read about it in a Hemlock Holmes Novel !!

  4. 0

    everyone is missing the point made here, if someone wanted to destroy our government and create a major problem, giving others free reign to do whatever they wanted, they simply need to do this and this senator has proven a point, although no-one likes the boy who cried wolf, if they listen the wolf is at the door

    • 0

      Is that so
      I say STUNT
      I say CRYING POOR
      I say I WANT TO BE ON TV

    • 0

      What they should install is those body scanners that they have at the airport.
      EVERY ONE MUST BE SCANNED especially the Greens – just in case they turn feral
      They say that they give you nose bleeds, diarrhea, vomiting, disorientation, irregular heart beat, …………………

    • 0

      STREWTH !! That sounds like all the things the Present Government are giving the Australian Public at the Moment !!.. I think they ate something Funny from the Speakers Lounge ??

  5. 0

    If you even breathe the word “bomb” or “gun” at an airport you are immediately arrested – joke or not! Again, it seems our pollies don’t have to obey the rules of the land!

    • 0

      And also You are being Monitored on here Too FBI & AFP !!!!..So don’t put a word out of place or You will end up with a Long Misunderstood Sentence !! A bit like some of the Waffle I’ve read on here this week !!..

  6. 0

    Ah Guy Fawkes, yes we remember him well. And please don’t anyone say “I was there at the time”.

  7. 0

    I say it was a stunt but the main thing is that it could have been very real and no stunt it is no worries about blowing up the building or the people in it (politicians who made the rules} ) more the fact that it could happen with our loved ones in there. And all for the sake of a few dollars saving.

  8. 0

    Well yeh I reckon that was fair enough he was making a good point!
    Unless they want a good clean out, then they should ignore him!

  9. 0

    If a member of the public had done the same thing they would have been charged and most likely spend time in clink. How come a poly doesn’t’ get this.

  10. 0

    So much for security.
    I will give you another example. My Mum and I visited Parliament House twice on one coach tour. She always carries nail scissors in her handbag as she has brittle nails and they snag on clothing when touched. The first time Security missed them. The second time they came ou on scans, she handed them in, she was given a numbered slip and was able to get them back as we left.



continue reading


The dos and don'ts of lifting weights if you're older

If you're to believe what you see on social media, only the young and super fit lift weights. This, unfortunately,...


Pfizer vaccine safe despite Norwegian deaths, say health authorities

Is the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine safe? Health minister Greg Hunt is assuring Australians it is after it was reported that...


Great things about ageing - as Dawn French says 'it's not for wusses'

A lot of people fear growing older but, if you ask us, the ageing process brings some great benefits, too...

Finance News

The top five things this leading economist thinks will happen in 2021

Saying the year 2020 wasn't a great one for the economy is a bit of an understatement. Shops shuttered, businesses...

Health news

Scientists closer to developing 'smart' stem cells made from human fat

Much controversy has surrounded stem cell research, and yet therapies and treatments involving stem cells have the capacity to treat...


Top 2021 new year's resolutions revealed

We may be halfway through January, but it's not too late to make a new year's resolution. "It’s human nature...


Spinach and Parmesan Crustless Quiche

In The Midlife Method, food and lifestyle writer Sam Rice explores why it is so much harder to lose weight...

Age Pension

Important details on how your income stream information is updated

Updating Income Stream InformationHi everyone, I wanted to chat about income stream reviews and how they may affect your Age...