Government cuts rate for retirees

Font Size:

After months of intense lobbying, the government finally cut deeming rates in July last year, recognising that they were out of step after the Reserve Bank’s cuts to official interest rates. In other money-saving news for retirees, the interest being charged on funds drawn via the Pension Loans Scheme (PLS) has also been cut.

Older Australians receiving payments under the PLS automatically began to benefit from the reduced interest rate from 1 January.

The interest rate dropped from 5.25 per cent a year to 4.5 per cent a year.

The PLS is essentially a reverse mortgage, except you can’t take it as a lump sum and interest compounds fortnightly.

The scheme was expanded in 2019 to include all eligible people of Age Pension age who have securable real estate owned in Australia.

The amount that can be borrowed, via a fortnightly loan, increased to 150 per cent of the fortnightly Age Pension.

Uptake of the scheme has been low – there were about 1100 participants late last year according to federal Treasurer Josh Frydenberg – but a surge is expected.

Calls to cut the interest rate being charged mounted as the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) cut the official interest rate to a historic low of 0.75 per cent.

Former Labor leader and current MP for Maribyrnong Bill Shorten said in Parliament: “The government is essentially acting as a bank for older people with mortgages. It has a good-hearted public service goal at heart.

“But when the Reserve Bank cut the official cash rate to a record 0.75 per cent on 1 October, this led to bank loan rates at three per cent and, indeed, as low as 2.9 per cent, while the government’s Pension Loans Scheme is still charging older Australians at 5.25 per cent.”

Mr Frydenberg confirmed that the government would review the rates, but said 5.25 per cent was “lower than the rates charged by the private sector”.

In other news, The Age reports that the Maximum Permissible Interest Rate (MPIR), which applies in residential aged care, has been cut to a new low of 4.91 per cent a year.

Rachel Lane, principal of Aged Care Gurus, explains.

“The MPIR applies to people funding their own accommodation in residential aged care.

“Essentially, whatever you don’t pay as a lump sum (known as a Refundable Accommodation Deposit, or RAD), you pay as a daily charge (DAP), which is calculated using the MPIR.

“For example, if the RAD is $500,000 and you pay $200,000, you will pay interest on the outstanding $300,000 at 4.91 per cent, or $40.36 a day.”

Does the lower interest rate on PLS borrowings make the scheme more attractive to you?

If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.

Join YourLifeChoices today
and get this free eBook!

Join
By joining YourLifeChoices you consent that you have read and agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

RELATED LINKS

Will mooted Centrelink changes affect you?

As government funds for bushfire relief put the budget surplus in doubt, changes to the way

Study finds some cancers are ‘better left undiscovered’

Australians are increasingly being diagnosed with cancers that will do them no harm if left undetected

How changes to the superannuation work test will affect you

Chandra wants to know how the upcoming changes to the super work test will operate.

Written by Janelle Ward

30 Comments

Total Comments: 30
  1. 0
    0

    Anyone would have to be desperate to take out a reverse mortgage on their home. As a full age pensioner I would never consider such a rip off arrangement.

  2. 0
    0

    Any schemes where you are paying more than bank interest is a disgusting rort. It’s just People making excessive money out of elderly people who have NO CHOICE where they go to spend their declining years.
    Rural people are forced into care up to two hours away from family and friends into homes. They don’t know anyone around them or who is caring for them and then they are over charged for the privilege of it. Disgraceful, way to treat people, many of whom are confused and frightened.

  3. 0
    0

    Disclaimer: will save thousands for those with many thousands stashed… something no sane person would do these days given government avarice.

    Still nothing wrong or difficult about simply taking the real earnings annually each year, via the ATO which has all such records, and using the real figure for income…

  4. 0
    0

    “Does the lower interest rate on PLS borrowings make the scheme more attractive to you?”

    In our position, we have no intention of using a reverse mortgage but that is a personal choice and we wouldn’t, for a moment, suggest that our choice is the only answer. That old expression about walking a mile on someone else’s shoes applies as there are people out there with enormous problems and who have a need for access to money.

    Whilst Frydenberg wants to equate the government rate with the market, there is a subtle difference. The market mainly has loans that charge interest on a reducing balance so the interest payments reduce each month. The PLS is not reducible, in fact it’s the opposite with interest increasing each fortnight so that borrowers are not only paying interest on principal but are also paying interest on interest.

  5. 0
    0

    In a word NO. There is nothing attractive to me about any of these schemes or reverse mortgages. Another point about PLS, if the government is charging an interest rate (ie 5.25%) significantly above the Reserve Banks cash rate (ie 0.75%) then it seems like a money making scheme rather than a benefit for retirees.

  6. 0
    0

    In a word NO. There is nothing attractive to me about any of these schemes or reverse mortgages. Another point about PLS, if the government is charging an interest rate (ie 5.25%) significantly above the Reserve Banks cash rate (ie 0.75%) then it seems like a money making scheme rather than a benefit for retirees.

  7. 0
    0

    No different to LNP government charging hypocritical DEEMING rates.

    They wouldn’t drop the rate by .75% on DEEMING rates for cash term deposits over $84K for a couple.

  8. 0
    0

    NO way– I worked hard to pay off my mortgage and did it way b4 time because I hate debt — so there is NO way would have another one — this bank interest now is disgusting you get nothing — soon they will charge you to have a bank account —
    Took this arrogant government long enough to wake up that the deeming rate was too high well over 2 years even though many had complained and had not a bloody thing done!

  9. 0
    0

    Talk about taking advantage of people in need – WOW! This is daylight robbery charging people an unreasonable interest rate. No one in their right mind should take out one of these loans. Not only should this interest rate come right down but also the deeming rate should be lowered to match the bank savings rates! Daylight robbery!

  10. 0
    0

    Whilst we are on the subject of interest rates. My biggest gripe is the fact that we are deemed to be earning 1% on the lower amount in our savings but 3% over anything above that. I don’t have a lot but enough to just stop me from getting the full pension. The best interest rate I can get is 1.55% I should have left my money in super.

    • 0
      0

      Yes A Nana, you get sweet BA at the banks these days — but are still charged a heap IF you have a loan — or if you had to pay off a Credit card — I steer clear of these but it is daylight robbery for those that do

    • 0
      0

      You are right about leaving it in super. I am on full AP, with minimal amount in super. But what’s there I try to leave there, because it’s earning hell of a better interest than the bank. Last year my super averaged around 13.5%, and whilst I realize this fluctuates, happy it’s there. A close friend took $75,000 out of her super to buy a motorhome to do the travel but after 5 months realised it wasn’t for her. She sold it for $65,000 but was annoyed she couldn’t put it back into super, only in the bank getting. 75%. As for the govt loan scheme, more like fraud scheme. Honestly, does anyone really expect the govt to bring in ANY system that would genuinely help seniors, not penalise them?

Load More Comments

FACEBOOK COMMENTS



SPONSORED LINKS

continue reading

Aged Care

Government releases five-year road map to fix a 'national disgrace'

The federal government has delivered its 'initial' response to the Aged Care Quality and Safety Royal Commission findings, with a...

Aged Care

Aged care, death and taxes after the royal commission

Anna Howe, Macquarie University The governor-general was handed the report of the aged care royal commission on Friday. It will...

Health

Honey drinks could be a tasty cold remedy

If you're feeling under the weather, something as simple and accessible as honey could be a tasty remedy. New research...

Prevention

How to find and exercise your pelvic floor muscles

Do you wet yourself a little bit when you laugh, cough or sneeze? Then you might be among the one...

COVID-19

What we know about the recently approved single dose vaccine

Some health experts have expressed concern at the efficacy of the AstraZeneca vaccine, with some stating that we 'only get...

Retirement Income

'Secret plan' to force retirees to use their home to fund retirement

Federal Treasurer Josh Frydenberg has backed the Retirement Income Review findings that retirees should use their savings more "efficiently" -...

Finance

Do life insurance payouts affect the Age Pension?

Geoff's death policy pays out to his children, not his wife. How does this affect the pension? Q. GeoffMy wife...

Fitness

Grip strength linked to mental disorders

Mental disorders such as anxiety and depression can increase physical health risks and are a leading cause of disability. Globally,...

LOADING MORE ARTICLE...