What’s missing from the ‘care’ plan

elderly woman in care home with nurse

There is something truly significant missing from the federal government’s $17.7 billion aged care reform package – people. 

While I support the intention of the reforms, I believe that the proposed investment in staffing – primarily focused on nursing and deeply rooted in a clinical model of care – is limited and potentially misleading. 

There is much more to caring than meeting someone’s medical needs. Aged care is just that – care. Most of us who work in the sector see care in a much more holistic sense, and we consider it to be a vital part of providing exceptional, all-round support, as well as ensuring our residents feel welcomed, valued and safe.

We need to take a human-centred approach when working across our aged care homes; to shift away from focusing on a medical model, to one that emphasises investment in our people.

Read: Most aged care homes would fail minimum staffing standards

At St Vincent’s Care Services, we have over 550 lifestyle team members, volunteers and pastoral carers.

These aren’t clinical roles, but their work is absolutely crucial when it comes to residents enjoying rich and meaningful lives.

So, why aren’t we talking more about these contributions when it comes to debating how to improve aged care, and provide residents with the best experience possible?

These are our residents’ homes, not a hospital, and for many, our staff are like a second family.

The work of these staff must be recognised and brought into the conversation. They shouldn’t be forgotten or overlooked as they seem to be by those with the task of delivering aged care reform. 

Read: Australia set for dire aged care shortage in the next decade

We also know that outside of the clinical, there are a host of other staffing-related factors that influence quality outcomes, including the skills, qualifications and experience of these dedicated staff members, the quality of training, organisational culture and the capacity of managers and leaders.

Because of the unique needs of each resident – if we want to take a person-centred approach to care – it stands to reason that the skill profiles among the centre’s staff will also be different from home to home.

Accordingly, we can’t take a rigid, cookie-cutter approach to the nature, make-up, and skills mix of staff.

We must … dive deeper into the people who make up our aged care community and the roles they play emotionally, spiritually and physically.

I hope that with further scrutiny, and as our leaders continue to wrestle with the issues brought up by the royal commission, we can expand the definitions of our staffing requirements, while comfortably meeting quality and safety standards.

Do you agree with Lincoln’s view? Why not share your experience in the comments section below?

If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.

Written by Lincoln Hopper

Leave a Reply

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

group of smiling elderley women doing strength training

Aged care expert tells why aged care is ‘so expensive’

petrol bowsers at service station

Transport, housing, furnishings drive inflation