Who would know Pepe.

There seem to have been a quite few (IMO) attacks recently reported by the media as "Attacker yelled 'Allahu akbar'" or similar. 

Then it turns out to be either the perpetrator didn't say/yell that anyway or the attack was motivated by personal problems, mental health issues or some previous angst with the victim/s which was nothing to do with extremists and/or just another FU attack with verbals.

I've given up knowing what to believe in these cases until the investigations, inquests and court cases are over. Even then some are still debatable to me.

R-n-R...who would know...these days you never know who is around you....a person can appear perfectly normal...and then attack you....many are high on drugs.

Lone wolf or no - if this is a religious nutter , then he has almost certainly been influenced by the radical mob and their religion of hate

Police have ruled out any form of radicalisation in the fatal stabbing of a 21-year-old British backpacker in north Queensland.

Romantic interest (unreciprocated) and cannabis now mentioned. Nothing definite.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-25/qld-backpacker-killing-no-indication-of-radicalisation-home-hill/7784228

Think this comment says it for me.

Zilch - Zero - Zippo!

The ONLY suggestion of Islamic terroism in this story comes from unconfirmed claims by unnamed people in a Murdoch news article, the worst possible source for balanced reporting on such matters.

We have a sick society when so many people are ready to leap to that connection as the casue.