Remember the 12000 fm Syria Abbott promised to take?

Well around half are in but................I found this and it is very interesting in that these people are coming in as permanent residents with all the benefits like Centrelink, medicare etc etc. 

No refugee status then.  read down


I was looking because read on Twitter that most who had arrived were Muslim not Christians as proposed by Abbott. And that turnbull, leftie as he is had changed it to Muslim seeing as the Left want them because of the trouble and strife they bring to further their plans for NWO and Bob B's One world Government.

 

9 comments

If it's on Twitter it MUST be true.

BigVal really is having a hate day today. Aboriginals AND Muslims.

... and probably you also - after she reads your rather "rude" remark!  LOL

The whole bringing in 12,000 refugees was a stunt, Tony needed a vote booster, the party had no intention of going through with it and did everything it could to stall it.  It still is, other countries that pledged to take refugees from the same country have fullfilled their obligations, yet we can't seem to get the job done.  At no stage do I remember Tony saying that it was a condition of entry that the refugees be christian, it was discussed, but typically with this government they could not reach a decision.

As far as I can see the bombs and bullets are not asking the victums if they are christian or muslim, why should we?

This government is either incompetent or disingenuous, which is it?

This financial year will be the single biggest intake of refugees since those accepted by Australia following World War II.

The 12,000 places are in addition to Australia's existing humanitarian intake for 2015-16 of 13,750.

Interesting statistics, they show that without the extraa 12,000 people, we would actually be taking less than the 1995-96 figures.  Even though there is more turmoil in the world than then.

Advance Australia fair?

It is not a stunt it is happening...just taking time because this time more thorough checks are being done on those who wish to come here.

So. if half of the people waiting to have thorough checks to be done are killed. will we replace them with a new batch?

Good point.

 

"The Minister for Immigration and Border Protection Peter Dutton stressed on Wednesday morning that the government would not be rushed in carefully vetting all applicants.

Unlike Canada, he said by phone from Geneva, Australia took refugees from two streams, via United Nations' referrals where applicants were well known to authorities and from referrals from families and groups in Australia.

"As we have seen in Brussels and Paris, there are security risks relating to the intake of any people. And we know the Assad regime is selling Syrian passports and we do know that people are passing themselves off as Syrian refugees, and we need to work through bonafides of each application and we need to do that methodically," he said on ABC's AM program."

I agree with the way the government is trying to ensure these people we bring in are genuine refugees and of good character.

This was announced 18 hours ago:

"Taxpayers could have to pay for up to 10,000 asylum seekers who arrived under the Rudd and Gillard governments and could be stuck in Australia indefinitely.

Immigration Minister Peter Dutton revealed last night about a third of the 30,000 asylum seekers still being processed from the Labor years would likely be deemed not eligible for protection, and were expected to refuse to return home.

He warned taxpayers would carry the burden for decades."

It just proves that beurocrats can always find a multitude of reasons for not performing when they don't want to.

If the latest poll is any indication half the population would agree with what the government is doing and some would not like any more coming at all.

Huh?

 

 

After seeing ACA a couple of days ago -  (Barak's fav. prog. - lol) Sharia Law portrays as nothing less than disgusting?   The old Muslim "family guy"  who featured in it - with his family - wants to introduce a second wife - and - possibly a third???  Also talked about the "killing of animals"! 

These people are a freakin' joke!  I also was recently "told" that the Govt. has just pushed thru' a new law - stating that Muslims do not have to pay as much "interest" (if any?)  on their loans as their "law" - states they should not pay interest!???   Is this for real?????

Also in the U.K. - the most recent "riot/march" by UK people -  against Muslims in London (couple weeks ago)  - had the Muslims yelling back  "FU FU - Your daughter will have my Muslim kids and your grandkids and your family forever more will be Muslims!"  (ABC2 Doco. last week)   Charming!

Report me if you like for "whatever"  - but - I am only stating what was on ACA and on ABC2 - and if YLC members cannot cop what is on National TV in this country - so be it!

There is very little good about Sharia Law. Therefore it's a good thing it doesn't apply in Australia.

And Foxy, you really should qualify statements that say "...the Muslims..." None of your claims apply to all Muslims, so please don't write as if they do.

......fair comment - however was not meaning to "generalise".  Good and bad in all races!

You betcha

Muslims or Islam is NOT a race. 

It effectively is racism. Most of the anti-Muslim comment one hears in Australia is directed at cultural aspects of people of mddle-eastern background, not othe Muslims. It doesn't apply to those who don't "look like" Muslims.

Nonsense

Yup

What an intellectual argument.

Australia was bringing in 12,000 refugees a year from UN Camp's . The highest rate per population in the world.
Turnbull has raised that to 19 000 plus a one off of 12,000 from Syria .
Labor want to raise it to 30,000 and the Greens to 50,000 .
Why don't the politicians listen to the people . We don't want them .
We do want people who will add to our Society not those we don't need and are a burden.

Taking in refugees has always been a successful policy for Australia in the past.

CARLOS,     that i the most sensible thing i have seen written on here regarding the intake of these people,    you are saying what MOST people are thinking,    certainly what im thinking,     FOXY,   did see that program with the pot bellied indivdual who wanted more wives,      i wonder,  when they go on the dole,   will ALL the wives be able to claim,   

Thinking that's sensible just makes you a hater.

Did you oppose all our past refugee programs?

Yes Muslims can get interest free loans

 

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Muslims+interest+free+loans&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab&gfe_rd=cr&ei=BOTqV6nmENDN8geauLyYCw

9 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment