The Assange saga continues
I am again bemused to see in the news that the UK government has issued a written demand to the Ecuadorian government to surrender Assange. The document (apparently) also contained a threat to "storm the embassy" if they fail to do so.
All this over a guy who to date has not been officially charged with a crime. He is wanted for QUESTIONING about incidents that quite probably wouldnt even be considered as crimes in most other countries. I understand that Assange and the Ecuadorian embassy have invited the authorities to interview Assange in the embassy and ask any questions they like.
It is increasingly difficult to label Assange as "paranoid" given all the time, effort and expense that is being put into getting him into custody and out of the UK, over what are quite trivial crimes in the grand scheme of things.
obby "A legal friend who has taken a lot of interest in this case has told me that this charge has never been proven in a Swedish Court."
Which may go some way towards explaining why the particular personalities in that country have gone out of their way to make this a highly public test case. What better opportunity than a celebrity like Assange?
That country warrants a travel alert for men.
Australia has headed down the same radical feminist path led by ministers like Nicola Roxon. Snuggle up to the wife and kiss her can be construed as sexual assault. She using a popular and well proven way of waking you for your birthday could be deemed rape.
Few members of the public understand what changes the Nicola Roxons in government have been beavering away on and on their behalf.
It is typical of the public to pooh pooh the effect of extensions of the law as most might have done in Sweden, until the radical feminist architects of the changes choose the timing for a test case.
What everyone has been silent on as well is the unfair and inevitable weighing of the odds against the man by naming and frequently shaming him. That applies to any alleged sexual assault. The media and the usual suspects among columnists laying his personal life and family up to public examination and scurrilous gossip. Even where there a court says the man has no case to answer the stain of the vile allegations last forever. After all, it is impossible for a woman to lie about rape, or so the matra goes.
Jenny Brockie (Insight) and the ABC have never done a program about the lasting devastation a false or mistaken accusation of rape or sexual assault has on a man and his loved ones.
I wonder though, how many of the serially outraged (against men) understand and can explain the changed definition/s of rape in Australia, let alone Sweden. Some words about the trend towards sexual assault allegations against child 'offenders' could be included.