Pollution map reveals Australia's most polluted postcodes

 

From www.abc.net.au

On the fringes of Australia's biggest cities, people work, live, and play next to some of the nation's biggest polluters.

Key points:

  • National Pollution Inventory data has been mapped according to postcodes

  • The Australian Conservation Foundation report reveals the country's most-polluted postcodes

  • Botany Bay in Sydney and Altona in Melbourne are the city's most-polluted areas

  • For the first time, Australia's pollution has been mapped by postcode in a report titled The Dirty Truth by the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF).

 

Some of the areas identified as being the most polluted in Australia's capital cities include:

  • Botany Bay in Sydney

  • Altona in Melbourne

  • Port of Brisbane

  • Parmelia near Perth

 

ACF found the lower the postcode's weekly household income, the more likely it was to be home to polluting facilities such as factories and refineries. 

"If you're in that bottom 60 per cent, you're much more likely to live around a polluting facility," ACF economist Matt Rose said.

And if you want to avoid living among pollutants?

"The best way is to have money essentially. And you can buy a house … in suburbs where there aren't any polluting facilities," Mr Rose said.

"They're in the top 20 per cent of income postcodes in Australia."

Read more at ABC News

6 comments

same goes for living near an airport, or under a flight path

It will be not long till we have totally ----ed the whole planet and won't matter where you live --  they are building new airports/more mines/more gas/more oil and denuding the planet of vegetation and wildlife all descriptions of which are all cogs in a wheel and if one is deleted and that causes another and so on.

Clearly, self interest, especially making money, comes before caring for the planet.

Australia is becoming more and more polluted, all the more reason why we should invest in renewable energy. 

 

Quite korreck Banjo, and time we start thinking in terms of nuclear alternatives!

What is the point of going nuclear if they still cannot do anything with the leftovers, storing for thousands of years is not a solution, would you want that in your backyard? Nuclear is still far too dangerous and we can suffice with renewables, get with the program, Spain is going 100% renewable why can't Australia?

And the pollution causes many health problems which become a burden on the system and more on disability and not able to work. We need more clean energy and this is a major reason, not just about climate change.

What about the many regional and country areas?  I live in a regional area because of clean air and water plus an environment that suits my needs - income is a secondary consideration.  The highest incomes tend to be in the major cities where also the most pollution occurs.  Your article is lacking realism

It is a superficial report.  ACF is suffering from relevance deprivation syndrome.

6 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment