Without safe, affordable housing women may return to violent partners

 
While emergency support services for those experiencing domestic and family violence (DFV) are effective and timely, the shortage of long-term housing leaves many women and children at risk of homelessness or considering a return to a violent home, according to new AHURI research.

The research, Housing outcomes after domestic and family violence, undertaken for AHURI by researchers from the University of Tasmania and University of New South Wales examines how housing and other forms support for vulnerable families can best be integrated to improve safety and wellbeing.

‘We found that, in general, the integrated responses to domestic and family violence adopted by Governments around Australia promote collaborative working relationships amongst services and provide support that is valued and appreciated by service users,’ says lead researcher Dr Kathleen Flanagan of the University of Tasmania.

‘However, data suggests Specialist Homelessness Services, which provide the principal crisis response for women and children who leave their home due to violence, can do little to provide a pathway from crisis into stable, secure and long-term accommodation, and our research provided us with clear evidence as to why this is the case. Without an adequate supply of affordable, suitable housing moving from short-term or transitional accommodation into permanent, independent housing is very difficult, and sometimes unachievable.’

Where safe, secure and affordable housing is not available, women may decide to return to a violent relationship because they perceive this as a safer option than the alternatives (such as homelessness).

The shortage of affordable housing means women can feel pressured to accept accommodation from support services that is substandard, too far from critical support networks or located in neighbourhoods or settings that are unsafe.

To meet the needs of vulnerable families, greater investment is needed in a range of affordable housing options, especially social and affordable housing that is planned and designed to be safe, secure and supportive as well as affordable in the long term. Programs designed to support renting in the private sector can help, but they are less effective in tight, competitive housing markets.

In addition, the researchers identified that:

  • inadequate income support payments can leave women and children living in poverty and unable to afford decent housing 
  • there is limited protection and assistance for migrant women sponsored to come to Australia by men who later become violent and abusive 
  • there are challenges at the intersection point between the child protection and family violence systems, particularly where lack of housing prevents women from reunification with children taken into statutory care 
  • Family Court decisions can trap some women in unaffordable housing markets in order to enable their violent ex-partner to continue to have contact with children.

10 comments

 

The PM has pledged $328m to help victims of domestic violence. The package includes $80 million for emergency accommodation for women and children. Hopefully this promise will be upheld regardless of which party wins at the next election.

Women should not have to return to a home from which they have fled because of DV.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-05/prime-minister-scott-morrison-to-pledge-328-million-to-combat-dv/10869862

 

Budget slights domestic violence services - Eureka Street15 May 2018 · In 2013-14 Australia's oldest running refuge, Beryl Women Inc., received a 32 per cent funding cut over a ... for women and children escaping domestic and family violence and other vulnerable people.

https://www.eurekastreet.com.au

Correction, should be

https://www.eurekastreet.com.au > article

Funding cuts could leave victims of domestic violence with nowhere to go - The Conversation22 Jun 2016 · Meanwhile, there are no clear reports about how much the cuts to refuges and other DVA-related services will save the taxpayer, or the council itself. Indeed, the high economic cost of this ...

theconversation.com>funding-cuts-could....

The fight for women’s refuge | overland literary journal

overland.org.au

In 2016, the Federal Liberal Government announced plans to cut $35 million in funding to community legal services for victims of domestic violence over a three-year period. In 2017, it was reported that the federal government was also planning to cut $110 million in funding to women’s refuges. Amanda Keeling noted for the Women’s Electoral Lobby that the 2018-2019 Federal Budget was ‘an opportunity to provide refuges with funding certainty and reduce the number of women and children living with violence. But there was nothing for those housing services in the Budget, and more women’s lives are at risk as a result of Government inaction.’

But Ny19, that's how we get 'back in the black'.   Gotta get that surplus, never mind that it's actually a Clayton's surplus.  ;)

Sad but true. And after all their effort to get the budget back in the black by cutting services they go and blow multi millions on advertising their greatness and re-opening Christmas Island for 1 month ($175 million + $185 million = $360 million). Twits!!!

There is an election coming one day

There is an election coming one day

Leon  -  methinks you lifted this from The Guardian.  Behave yourself mate.

What struck me as I read the article was that women were not forced to stay with deadbeat partners and be attacked.  This is THEIR choice....and yes I get the bit about having a roof over your head.  Most women would simply pack up one day the ratbag hubby was at work and be gone.  Hasta la vista bebe!

Women do not lack advice, advocacy and representation.  What most might do is change the locks, take out an AVO or simply contact the police, confident that the whisper of complaint would see him gone and still responsible.

Regarding the availability of housing, how can the private sector be expected to be constantly shouldering the responsibility shed by government, the federal governments in particular, who moved out of providing welfare housing because it was far too expensive and unmanageable by its bureaucrats?  

And what about the supply problems where builders, State and local governments have constantly reported problems of trying to play catch-up with infrastructure in the face of increasing high mass immigration numbers that have been the fact for decades?  The feds use Ponzie growth to make their Budgets look better, Bill Shorten is promising to do the same, but it is the other levels of government and the public who have to endure the mounting problems from the notion of a 'Big Australia, Now!'.

What about share accommodation in high rises?  Live like those Asian peoples in those teeming cities that are always being used by cynical federal politicians and others to 'prove' that Australia is 'underpopulated'?

There simply isn't the will by any federal government, past, present or future (and especially any incoming Labor +Greens administration to take the big lead hoof off the mass immigration pedal. And none of them will ever be taking any responsibility for the high rents that are coming as investors and developers are warned away from building residential.  The run away from property investment is happening now.

Possibly quite right Mick - known a woman for 42 years, 3rd bloke, always exactly the same. Bashed up

on the weekend, lovey-dovey shortly after "Oh that was nothing" and on it goes to the next round. Just never come between them!

LJ  -  rules for women, different rules for men. Perspective and fairness always are the first casualties.  Breast cancer research dollars should tell us all about that.  Cheers.

CJ,

Police do say they are majorly required to attend the same addresses, the same domestic disturbances over and over.   Something in there about continually making the same poor choices and usually booze and drugs are part of it. 

While the neglected children babysit one another or if lucky get some food from concerned neighbours.

We make our bed and unless we make every attempt to lie in it we are going to cost somebody somewhere their time. Partnership is a promise, a contract. While it may not specify even obvious things like:

Violence is out, communication is in.

Falsehood is out, truth is in.

Conniving and greed is out generosity is in.

Standing by your partner through adversity is in, running for easy relief is out.

and perhaps much else, these things are fairly understood. You break your contract if you threaten or befuddle, lie or run. Yet, sometimes breaks are inevitable. Then, we need shelter. Low cost shelter. We have a community which has been prepared to spend enormously in an effort to assist. This provision has however not always been effective. While we coset some with this protection we leave others homeless. 

There are several things which should predicate our provision of this benificence. The first is that shelter should be available quickly for all. That will necessary mean spending less, much less on each. I have seen multiple "low cost housing units" cost well over $1/2 million not including the land or demolition. A disgrace in the face of homlessness. We need to come to terms with the difference between necessity and what the Jones' are thought to have. If I have no roof over my head or no warm clothes, or food. Those are what I need not a house which could fit into any average street. Help me survive and help me gain the tools to secure that by myself. 

Second is that shelter is not all that is required. A worthwhile self-propelled existence is probably of equal value. People must be able to find a fit with their community, work or other worthwhile experience must become part of their sheltering.

Third, society is stuck-up. It judges on the basis of a stary image of the world. This makes it hard to be hard up when it is perhaps the simplest and most understandable thing in the world. We are one.

 

It's terrible. it is terrible when, due to lack of money or social status, women are forced to return to rapists. is there really no other way out of a terrible situation?

10 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment