ABC breached impartiality rules

The ABC has breached the impartiality provisions of its own Code of Practice in a Catalyst program ‘Feeding Australia: Foods of Tomorrow’.

The program was focused on more sustainable ways to produce food, including fish, green leafy vegetables, tomatoes, avocados and protein with a focus on beef.

An Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) investigation found that the program failed to present the production of beef with due impartiality, as it did for other foods. 

“It is an editorial decision of the broadcaster as to how particular matters will be presented. However, the code requires that the overall presentation must still be done so in a manner that achieves due impartiality,” said ACMA Chair Nerida O’Loughlin.

ACMA found Catalyst used dramatic visual displays, emotive language and moral arguments in the segments that referred to beef. In aggregate, these caused the program to demonstrate a lack of fair treatment and open-mindedness.

“The sustainability of Australia’s food supply is an important topic for discussion on which there will be different views held in the community. The ACMA considers that, had the program dealt with some matters differently, the program may have met the code requirement for impartiality,” said Ms O’Loughlin.

ACMA also assessed the accuracy of various statements about beef production in the program and found no breach of the code.

As a result of the investigation, the report has been communicated to the program’s production team. Given the ABC’s strong track record of compliance with the code, ACMA accepted that this as an appropriate action.

FirstPrev12(page 2/2)
19 comments

Murdoch is definitely biased. ABC is a valuable source of information and compared to Murdoch press it is extremely trustworthy. Fact check can be applied when in doubt. Everyone has a bias. It depends on whether lies are told like in the recent election and the figures were detailed on Murdoch influenced papers and broadcasting bore this out. People who continually watch Murdoch will not be able to judge on the authenticity of the ABC because they are brainwashed. People also believe what they want to believe despite any proof to the contrary.

Except the ABC is funded by the taxpayer and it shouldn't be pushing an agenda. 

 

Good thing they are not then, Rosret.

Once again, it's all down to opinion and viewpoint. In my view the ABC is slightly biased but then so is the rest of the media. It all depends on each's adgenda. ABC one side, Sky the other. Hopefully as sane thinking people we will realise when it happens and act accordingly. No one could deny the deflated attitude at the ABC after the results were coming in and conversely, the elated attitudes at Sky. Why the differences???

I have not found the ABC to be biased in any way they rip strips off both Lib and Lab,  unlike the likes of  'SKY"

I don’t think we’ll have our ABC for too much longer. The LNP and it’s supporters have been slowly undermining it and want to sell it off. Watch this space and get ready to fight if you care about OUR ABC.

Returning to the OP, here is a report [click for link]

The complaint to the umpire, ACMA, was only made after Richard Norton, CEO of Meat and Livestock Australia had failed to get action from the ABC to comply with its own stated rules for independence and balance in reporting.  That is, the ABC was deliberately misleading the public by putting to air a slanted report that was not factually correct.  Then the managers responsible thumbed their noses at the reasonable request from the CEO of Meat and Livestock Australia for a simple apology.

What is not being disclosed by the ABC is who was responsible for approving the slanted political reporting in the first place and what action has been taken to counsel and discipline those responsible for lack of professionalism that brought the national broadcaster into disrepute and could have damaged the future of Australia's primary industries at home and abroad.

 

It is going on a year after the offence.  Was anyone moved as a result and if not, why not?

FirstPrev12(page 2/2)
19 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment