The uncertain future of nature reserves

An international study has revealed extensive removal of legal protection for conservation reserves, at a time when the preservation of these areas is more important than ever to biodiversity.

The study, involving a global consortium of researchers led by Conservation International, documents how governments from 73 countries, including Australia, have removed more than 500,000 km2 from protected areas and downgraded protection for an additional 1.65 million km2 to allow greater human impacts.

The research examined losses occurring over a 125-year period. Alarmingly, more than three quarters of these losses occurred since 2000.

Dr Carly Cook from Monash University led the assessment of changes to Australian protected areas. 

She identified more than 1500 changes, resulting in the removal of 13,000 km2 from conservation areas and undermining protection for an additional 400,000 km2.

“The losses we see in Australia reflect a shift towards the commercialisation and exploitation of conservation areas for human uses,” Dr Cook said.

“We’ve seen governments across the country open up protected areas to commercial developments, such as hotels and marinas, and introduce a string of changes to permit forestry, livestock grazing, hunting and fishing.

“People think protected areas offer permanent protection for biodiversity, but this isn’t the case.

“The future for protected areas is increasingly uncertain at a time when natural systems face greater threats than ever.”

The study shows that no conservation areas are immune to losses, with protection removed from important biodiversity hotspots, such as the Amazon Basin, and iconic areas, such as Yosemite National Park in the US.

Removing protected areas or allowing activities that are not compatible with biodiversity conservation, will negatively impact the species these areas were designed to protect. Losing protection increases habitat loss and means natural areas become smaller and more fragmented.

The authors are calling for greater transparency to fully understand the scale of the problem and the impacts on biodiversity.

“A single change in legislation can have alarming impacts,” said Dr Cook.

“For example, a legislative amendment to allow commercial development in NSW impacted 600 national parks and nature reserves.”

The study authors call for international conventions to establish systems to monitor and report on the loss of conservation areas that match current systems for tracking their establishment.

In the absence of systematic monitoring and reporting, studies such as this are critical for increasing awareness of the ways in which protected areas are being undermined.

11 comments

Crying shame what is done quietly behind closed doors.  So much we dont hear about and why? 

We must preserve some areas free from human activity,  which is largly for profit seemingly from report. Resorts etc for tourist trade. 

Human population is in desperate need of culling and nature takes its course and does this by way of violent storms floods and of course disease. 

Maybe why flu this year is so deadly - what do you think? Last Flu pandemic was 1956. And before that 1918. 

Does nature cull us humans? 

 

The loss of reserves is quite evident in Tasmania, where forests and wetlands (bogs, peatlands and swamps) that take centuries to mature are being logged, burnt as part of a stupid 1960's science about "fuel reduction", or not considered worthy of protecting (by rapid attack) from natural fires.

  This moronic government has changed National Parks and Nature Reserves into "Recreation Zones" under the Planning Schemes. There are plans to extend walks with accommodation to import diseases, wastes and litter, plus  and "upgrades" that allow for cyclists, imported gravel pathways and a general dumbing down of natural areas. Of course the surrounds to the accommodation areas are burnt off or cleared.

For the wind farms, those wonderful bird-killing power sources, they are cutting many kilometres of 60m wide clearings for the transmission lines, straight through high value ecosystems making many isolates and without any attention to threatened species or natural communities.

There is an ecological adage that says "given time, Nature always wins". I agree, Berry: time for a cull.  Do I hear anyone of you out there who thinks that these tourism enhancements are good? Jobs and Growth? 

Yes, Janus. 

Then there is the ugly cable car proposal for Mt Wellington, another for Mt Roland and also at Cradle Mountain. 

The Tasmanian government seems hell bent in turning everything into a tourism development. 

There is enough Big Holes Around Without Digging More.

Not all Mining Leases Are Actively In Operation and Lay Dormant For Years Then Go Into Receivership to Avoid Remediation of land.

Unused Mining Leases Should be Given To Other Mining Companies Before Digging More Holes.

I'm not against Mining, Just the Big Holes Left to fill up with water then spill/burst over or drain in Aquifers.  

 

 

MAN is slowly but surely killing off everything that is of beauty,  or substance in the world,    even the rainforest,   in africa,   home to many beaytiful animals,   is being decimated,    the poor orangs are being wiped out,   other species that a few years ago were in abundance,   are now dwindling to very low numbers,     soon they will be gone,   BERRY,    you are so right,    things like the flu epidemic,   plague,  wars,    all help to keep the population  down,    but unfortunatly,     these are not happening  fast enough to keep up with the population growth,       i hate to think of what the world will be like when my grandchildren,   and great grand ones,    grow up,   they will be looking at picture books,   wondering what these animals were,    it really is enough to make you weep,    man is his own worse enemy,    

Yes Cats ... very sad.

RnR,    IT is a terrible thing to say,   but another war would help,     that is what war does,    thins the population and lets us get back to being able to sustain the population we have,    we need contrception in EVERY country,     countries are starving because of over population,    if we dont do something quickly,    we are doomed,    [if its not already to late]   war is horrible,  i know, [i lived through the 2nd war in london,    BUT ,    it is the only way to sustain  the planet,  ,    

So why did so many vote this federal government back in? A PM who brandished coal in government like it was some sort of sick golden future for us all. A political party that killed the carbon credit scheme set up by the Gillard government. A liberal/national government voted back into NSW that legislated for massive land clearing by farmers. It is beyond belief that so many people don’t seem to care about the future of our planet and all of life upon it. We are doomed! What is the point of caring anymore when so many people have shown in the recent NSW state election and Federal election that they don’t care about environmental issues?

Because they are selfish and only care about the dollars in their pockets.

I have fought for the environment for years - in particular against gas fracking and chopping down of old growth forests. I am beginning to feel jaded. There appears to be not much point in continuing anymore because it’s a losing battle. Too many people just don’t care....especially LNP governments and supporters.

I know how you fee Ny19, I have been hoping and wishing for years and though we have had a few wins, we have had mostly losses, but the next generation will keep on keeping on and hopefully they will regenerate what has already been lost. But of course this won't help with species that have become extinct and with the many who are on the edge.

Hearing about the little finch that supposedly Adani is going to protect is a joke. How  the QLD government is allowing a company to go ahead in a fragile habitat to build a mine, when it has an environmentally disasterous record of not following through on past promises to abide by regulations is outrageous.

I love a timid country

a land of scare campaigns

Where mindless bogan slogans

overtake our brains

the stunted short horizons

of those who will not see

who, presented with alternatives

think only:me,me,me.

(courtesy of Mike Funnell)

Our generation  has a big  fight  on our hands tp  help protect and preserve our natural environment There are are many environmental organizations you can donate to. Or plant trees and bushes ourselves if youhabe a garden to bring  back wildlife. Non  use of poisons on gardens.Small things can help

Our generation  has a big  fight  on our hands tp  help protect and preserve our natural environment There are are many environmental organizations you can donate to. Or plant trees and bushes ourselves if youhabe a garden to bring  back wildlife. Non  use of poisons on gardens.Small things can help

I knew this was going on but did not realize how bad it was, we have a big fight on our hands to protect what is left, there are many organizations that are working hard on this, check out Natures Conservancy: 

https://www.natureaustralia.org.au/

 

 

Humans are the main culprits, we waste natural resources. Animals are overhunted. Forests cleared most of the time unnecessarily, exposing land to wind and water damage. Fertile soil is exhausted and lost to erosion because of poor farming practices.Development and conservation can coexist in harmony, if only people knew more about how sustainable development works. There are many different resources we need to conserve in order to live sustainably. Fuel supplies are depleted. Water and air are polluted. 

Ironically, Venezuela, one of the most dangerous and politically volatile countries on the planet leads the way when it comes to conservation. The government designated 53.9 per cent of its territory as protected and it seems to be working.

Yep, things seem to be working there ok. The lefty government of Venezuela is setting a great example for the rest of the world. It wasnt that long ago that a few Australian Socialists from the ABC, Unions, Muslim community, Greens and Labor party invited Hugo Chavez to Australia to share ideas. 

Coalition’s reef advocate backs massive tree clearing plan.

Coalition MP Warren Entsch has backed a plan to bulldoze 2000 hectares of pristine forest near the Great Barrier Reef despite being appointed to a role championing the natural marine wonder.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison appointed the veteran Liberal MP, who represents the seat of Leichhardt in north Queensland, as special envoy to the Great Barrier Reef in last month’s ministerial reshuffle.

Mr Entsch once owned Olive Vale station, a large Cape York farm north-west of Cairns, and has been a vocal proponent of land clearing on farming properties in north Queensland. Land clearing can create sediment and nutrient run-off and is the main driver of serious water quality problems on the Great Barrier Reef.

Sydney Morning Herald, Sunday 2/6/2019

Looks as if he realized there was more money in Politics than olives

Do we really need yet another US based privately funded (as in relies on donations) organisation interfering in the domestic affairs of other countries, in this case Australia?

Why the avoidance of discussion of the policies of the Australian public body charged with the responsibility to protect biodiversity?

Why no mention of Dr Sally Box, the Australian government appointed threatened species Commissioner? The new Commissioner is inviting comment from the public, go for it! [click for link]

It is a darn disgrace that MORE is not being done to look after the wild life -- and that INCLUDS Animals as well as insects and the like -- as one depends on the other -- wipe on out and it wipes another out that depended on it for food -- and STOP spraying the likes of Glysphate --- why Ctas and the like are not banned unless they are fully enclosed is beyond me -- but they are not interested in doing that -- cats are like cane toads and are doing the same amunt of damage to the enviroment.

11 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment