Electricity company accused of misleading pricing

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has filed proceedings in the Federal Court against electricity company Sumo Power alleging that the company made false or misleading representations to Victorian consumers in relation to its electricity plans.

In its claim, the ACCC alleges that between June and November 2018 Sumo promoted 12-month electricity plans with low rates and large ‘pay on time’ discounts of up to 43 per cent, while planning to substantially increase the prices charged to those consumers who signed up within a few months, or knowing it was likely to do so.

Sumo substantially increased the underlying rates for certain consumers by approximately 30 to 46 per cent.

The ACCC alleges the price increases were in line with a pre-determined strategy, which Sumo had not disclosed to consumers. 

The ACCC also alleges that the price increases substantially eroded or eliminated consumers’ pay on time discount. 

“We allege Sumo enticed consumers to enter into electricity plans with the promise of low cost electricity prices, while planning a significant rate increase which meant consumers were charged significantly more for their electricity than they were led to expect,” ACCC chair Rod Sims said.

It is also part of the ACCC’s case that Sumo subsequently misled consumers when advising them that the price increases were due to wholesale energy cost factors including generation cost rises and “climate change and ageing assets forcing the closure of cheap coal fired power stations”.

Sumo used telemarking agents to cold-call residential consumers and promote its electricity plans. The ACCC claims that, acting on behalf of Sumo, the telemarketing agents represented they were independent and would perform a comparison of plans across a number of retailers, when in fact they were contracted by Sumo to sell Sumo plans.

“Electricity bills are a major household expense for many consumers,” Mr Sims said.

“We allege that consumers were likely to have been convinced to switch to Sumo, acting on recommendations from purported independent consultants when in fact they came from Sumo telemarketing agents.”

Should the government do more to clean up the energy sector and shifty pricing policies?

6 comments

               ''Should the government do more to clean up the energy sector and shifty pricing policies?''

Six Guidelines for “Getting to Yes” – BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

The Government needs to do more on electricity and MANY more things it seems to ignore -- till it is forced into it

A big YES from me.

Even a bigger yes, but unfortunately I doubt the government, par for the course,  will not do anything.

Sumo should be drawn and quartered!

Looking at the list, far too many energy companies exist for no advantage to the the consumers, essential utilities should all be govt owned and run and minimum cost........I'm dreaming!

 

I use Red it is Aussie owned !

 

According to this site ...

Energy Company Ownership 2019

More info about each one at ...

http://micropowergrids.com.au/Energy_Company_Ownership.html

Thanks for that RnR

It is interesting that Sumo Power is Australian owned which is the company ACCC took action against.

I too use Red Energy.  I switched from another company many years ago because I felt they treated me badly.  I was signed up with a 10% pay on time discount (electricity only, not supply) but suddenly received a bill with no discount.  On making enquiries I was told that you had to renew each year or you lost the discount, but they never informed me of this. 

I shopped around and found Red, loved that it was wholly Australian owned, it's call centres are in Australia staffed by Australians, who understand what I am talking about.  This means also that their taxes are paid here - company and staff.

I started at 10% discount with Red (now 12%, rewarded for loyalty) and the discount is on the whole bill, including supply to the home.  As a country user the supply to the home (poles and wires) is double what major city people pay, over $1.44 per day - my last bill the Sevice charge was $129.69 for 90 days, so getting the discount on the whole bill is major.

I have enquired, and nothing changes unless I phone and ask about other plans.  So no suddenly losing my discount.  I've stayed with Red because I trust them.  By the way, when they found out I was leaving, the other company offered to match Red's offer but I declined.

 

 

 

 

 

41.40 per day

 

 

Tango18, you poor bugger the one power company for years....LOL get this there is no loyalty, loyalty is one way and it looks like you give it...

 

 oh by the way I am in Ausnet area and my service charge is .98 cents a ay

 

 

Australian owned means the companies shares are owned by people or entities that are Australian residents BUT may not be Australians

So, that is deceptive...right?

 

 

Ref Tood and Tango 18, Here in N Queensland our supplier is ERGON and Qlnd gov owned,  Our service charge $1.00/Day + a$1.00/week  meter charge, state owned is not allways cheaper.

As with anything - electricity, phone, insurance, etc. Loyalty simply means a way to rip you off. I too haggle for all discounts and keep track of discount end dates. It is totally appalling that YOU have to ring a company and chase up any discount deals, and that YOU have to renew upon expiry. Many seniors don't understand this, and this is where the most vulnerable get screwed.

There needs to be a full investigation into the conduct of the energy industry.  They offer a multitude of plans supposedly to give more options and choice but this makes it almost impossible to establish which is the best plan because of the tiered rates, different rates for different parts of the year, daily charges etc.  by continually changing the pricing structure they can use their database to change the structure to increase their revenue across the client base and make it very difficult even for those who keep checking which is the best plan.   The only time their calculations for you mean anything if when your usuage in the next year will exactly match the previous year which is not alway the case. More time at home? Colder weather.  They should all be required to have the same overall pricing structure and each provOfer should only be allowed one structure with the discount bring a variable if they like. 

Yes they give % discount off

But what is it off  ???

6 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment