BOM Says its Hot when it is not

 

BOM Says its Hot when it is not 

 

 

Enough is enough. The Bureau of Meteorology yet again stands charged with fabricating temperature records. 

 

This time, thanks to the diligence of scientist Jennifer Marohasy, the bureau has been caught red-handed regulating temperatures to keep them above a predetermined minimum — at least for two NSW automatic weather stations, one located in Goulburn, the other at Thredbo. 

 

British author and journalist Christopher Booker says: “When future generations look back on the global warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records — on which the entire (global warming) panic ultimately rested — were systematically ‘adjusted’ to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.” He says this practice has been observed by experts around the world and “raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface temperature record”.

 

He is joined by John Theon, retired chief of NASA’s Climate Processes Research Program and responsible for all weather and climate research, who testified before congress that “some scientists have manipulated the observed data to justify their model results. In doing so, they neither explain what they have modified in the observations, nor explain how they did it.” 

 

Take the article NASA published in 1999 showing 1934 was the US’s warmest year. Across the ensuing decade, by cooling the past and warming the present, 1998 jumped five places to become the warmest. Whistleblower John Bates, recently retired principal scientist at US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, described how his agency manipulated data to manufacture a non-existent increase in global temperatures.

 

Science writer and blogger Joanne Nova has raised scandal after scandal concerning the BOM’s record-keeping. 

 

She refers to historic data being destroyed, and the influence of adjustments on Australia’s warming trend. She reports private auditors advising the bureau of almost a “thousand days where minimum temperatures were higher than the maxes”. 

 

Taxpayers outlaying $1 million a day for reliable temperature data deserve better than this.

 

 Marohasy is a respected scientist, known for her forensic work. While attempts will be made to dismiss her evidence it is a smoking gun that threatens the integrity of global temperature records. 

 

It affects every Australian. It strikes at the heart of renewable energy policies. Globally, trillions of taxpayer dollars are at stake.

 

 Now, with Marohasy’s evidence adding to the credible findings of other experts, there can be no confidence in any future official assurances. Further delay of a proper independent audit, which includes dissidents, can be interpreted only as a cover-up. 

 

One way or another, the truth will out.

 

Australian 19 09 2017!

2 comments

this article is from murdoch's rag the australian.

it is well known that he commands his presstitutes to  try and debunk the science of climate change.

they want to undermine and neutralise our bureau of meterology as it is doing such a good job and giving us the service we are paying our taxes for.

doubt anything written by a murdoch publication.

Winston Churchill once said to a woman berating him for changing his position, “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, madam?”

Churchill never said that, it was John Keynes.

Keynes said no such thing 

2 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment