fair comment

A comment by a 57 year old grabbed my attention and worth sharing . The article I was reading was about workfair and coalition submissions or deletions .

At 57, I'm probably almost the last of the generation who remember post offices routinely being opened between 9am and 12pm Saturdays, in line with the retailers. At a time too when my parents paid at our local post office, such a thing called a radio license. But it was for the television, black and white at the time.

As a taxpayer, I'm tired of the massive costs of this Monday to Thursday fly in/fly out federal pollies. Save money by keeping them in Canberra for the parliamentary sitting duration. We pay for their Canberra digs anyway. No family reunions either whilst in Canberra during the parliamentary sittings, unless the pollie pays for it out of their own pocket.

The parliamentary dining room should have some entitlement cuts as well.

The prime minister should be required to pay rent at the lodge (is it fixed yet) and a levy to cover meals other than state sponsored occasions.

And I'm tired of paying first class fares and accommodation, and palatial offices plus staff for our many former PMs. A sunset clause of five years after ceasing the office of PM.

And we should look at the over generous out of step super that Mr Abbott and his contemporaries are still entitled to. This should be downgraded to match that of the new members of parliament who do not get this antiquated over entitled taxpayer gift.

My list is not exhaustive. I've given great thought regarding the end of the age of entitlement and how much money as a taxpayer I could save.

All I know is - with an elderly parent in care, I could not imagine the staff who look after my father so well, attending to his most undignified accidents and needs with dignity, care, good grace and patience, never debasing is humanity - how they could be told that a low base wage is all they deserve for nights, weekends and holidays even Christmas.

5 comments

article

source

The Government's submission only lists five of the nine paragraphs, the missing four are:

(a) relative living standards and the needs of the low paid;

(b) the need to encourage collective bargaining;

(da) the need to provide additional remuneration for:
        (i)  employees working overtime; or
        (ii)  employees working unsocial, irregular or unpredictable hours; or
        (iii)  employees working on weekends or public holidays; or
        (iv)  employees working shifts;

(e) the principle of equal remuneration for work of equal or comparable value.

geo we all have dreams, then we wake up, when pollies can get away with some of their claims , like claiming accomadation during a charity bike run, and other, they are all guilty of ripping off the public, so what hope is there for any of them to voluntarilly reduce any of their rorts.It is much easier to attack those in the lower income range. Our idiot treasurer idolises the Indian way, Nothing for the elderly, as he has stated, each family look after their own.

Unfortunately all our politicians think they are our Royalty instead of behaving as our servants

How true, thet're there to protect our assets, but sell them off, gives them less responsibility, now they can blame the new owners who charge like mad bulls, or do what Howard did create a so called 'futures fund'  out of the sale of assets now in the billions, only for pollies and beurocrats. of course.

I totally agree with you Geomac. Stop the age of ridiculous over entitlements by pollies. This government keeps on bleating about end of age of entitlement. Well, they should set an example. Cost cutting in Canberra, no more jaunting about the world, continual wage rises, etc etc All parties are guilty of this. Royal Spanish Inpuisition with painful cuts needed.

And when they get income rises, and somebody comments, they say an 'independant body' recommended them.

They forget to say who appointed the independant body.

Also, they don't have to accept the recommendations.

 

 

As you say Ted

The Independent Tribunal Members know the hand that feeds them and so one hand washes the other.... both at the Taxpayer expense.

5 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment