Is the couples' Age Pension fair?

Posted on behalf on Max

The current rate of pension paid to single pensioners is $873.90 a fortnight and to a member of a married couple is $658.70 a fortnight (combined a married couple receives $1317.40 a fortnight).

I wish to point out that where you have to singles or two people living in a de-facto relationship who are each claiming the single pension receive a combined payment of $1747.80 a fortnight.  This is a difference of $430.40 a fortnight more than the married couple. 

I have discussed this with Centrelink and the answer I got from them was that two people can live cheaper than one, but when I said that is not right they didn't want to discuss the matter. 

My argument is why should two singles living in the same home receive $215.40 each more than the married couple. This is in my opinion blatant discrimination against married couples by the Federal Government of the day and Centrelink. 

I am coming up on 80 yearsof age and I will go to my grave fighting for married couples to each receive the single rate of pension.   

I mentioned above that Centrelink seems to think that two people (married couple) can live cheaper than two singles in the same home.  As we all know that is not the case as they have to buy twice as much food etc and in many cases they are each on multiple medications and need to have different foods.

At the moment married couples on the aged pension are not much better off than a person on the dole who receives around $540.00 a fortnight, and most on the dole have never worked or paid taxes, and probably never will and will finish up on the single aged pension.

To put it bluntly I worked until I was almost 76 years of age and supported my wife and I feel that we are entitled to the same rights as the person on the single age pension. 

Do you agree with Max?

FirstPrev45678(page 8/8)
102 comments

Thanks Pendrey and Abby, totally agree, it should not be relevant to the govt who you are living with, and as Abby points out, it is picked up in tax returns.

 

Yes Jan

The politicians squeze the pensioners, yet there is enough funds available for their opulent pension wthall their perks.

There is also plenty of money to give to United Nations, they scatter money around the world to get themselves a cushy job after they leave poltics ... 

and even the Clinton Foudation ......"Australian taxpayers spent $6.5m through the Clinton Foundation in 2007. This increased to $9m the following year. The peak year so far was 2012-13, with $10.3m going to the foundation."  

.....I must ask why 

Pendry,there is nothing like having a pet your problem is that the pet would either run away from you or die of die of lack of care,I wonder what type of centrelink payment you are on and what you do with it!!!!

Nothing wrong with having a pet, just not relevant to the topic under discussion

if I move in with a partner and we each have a dog ... we get a reduced pension... of course we will be substantially worse off.

If i have a car, is it cheaper to  register it if i am single  ?

Do I then get cheaper petrol and registration and tyres ands servicing ?

It is less expensiive per head to run a car or a house for a couple which is why the pension is set up the way it is

Older people are very well looked after in this country. Look around at what's on offer elsewhere and then people will appreciate the good life they have here instead of continually complaining. Practice frugality, thankfulness and appreciation for what one has. Sermon over.

FirstPrev45678(page 8/8)
102 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment