Mark Latham article

For those interested but unable to open Mark Latham's article from the Telegraph I copy it here in full. 

IN the age of political disruption, there is only one immovable constant.
Australia’s elite class of political insiders continues to get things wrong. This is the fuel driving the rise of the outsiders — voters disillusioned with the two-party system, searching for strong leadership to restore their economic and social freedoms.


In the United States, Britain and Australia, the malaise of the elites started with the invasion of Iraq in 2003 — sacrificing thousands of young lives and trillions of taxpayers’ dollars, only to make the world a more dangerous place through the emergence of Islamic State.


Saddam Hussein had an easy answer for troublemakers. He put them up against the wall and shot them. Now, due to the folly of the neo-conservative foreign policy establishment, Iraqi-inspired terrorists are shooting at us.


Over the past 12 months, the elites have had a particularly bad time.
They thought it was good idea for presidents, prime ministers and famous people across the world to tell working-class Britons not to leave the European Union.


The revolt of the outsiders started with Brexit.
Then the insider class scoffed at the idea of Pauline Hanson returning to federal Parliament, with the ultimate elitist, Malcolm Turnbull, dismissing her as an “unwelcome presence”.
Hanson won four Senate seats and Turnbull lost 14 in the lower house.
He established a unique electoral pattern: the further one moved away from the CBD of our major cities, the bigger the swing against the Liberal Party.


Then, to cap off their mistakes, the elites dismissed Trump as an unelectable joke — both in the Republican primary contest and the general election against Hillary Clinton.
Their preferred Republican was Jeb “Low Energy” Bush — someone devoid of drive or inspiration for winning the culture wars: pushing back against the Left’s PC programs, social engineering and identity politics.


Sound familiar?


Can you think of an Australian leader who’s petrified by the thought of dismantling the ABC, SBS, the Human Rights Commission and the cultural Marxism dominating our university and school systems?


Since 2013 we’ve had two of them, actually — Turnbull and Tony Abbott — both as ineffective as each other in fighting for freedom. This is the problem with what I call civility conservatives. They pay too much homage to institutions, frozen into believing that change can only come at a respectfully slow and gradual pace.
Meanwhile the bourgeois inner-city left has raced ahead with its infiltration of public institutions — using them as a platform for depicting everyday Australians as racist, bigoted, wife-bashing monsters.


It is an outrageous slandering of good people by taxpayer-funded snobs. And neither Turnbull nor Bill Shorten have lifted a finger to stop it.
In fact, there’s tripartisan support (Liberal, Labor and Greens) for funding the government agencies culturally at war with suburban and regional Australia.


This is what the current parliament is presiding over: institutions that hector and harangue people, telling them it’s wrong to love Australia Day, to wave the flag, to sing the anthem, to celebrate the virtues of our majority European heritage.


We are losing our country and the pillars of Western civilisation that have made us great. Yet the only time Turnbull can fire up in Parliament is when his own political skin is on the line.


No wonder Cory Bernardi has left the Liberals. No wonder the outsider vote in Australia, mainly clustered around Hanson, is 20-25 per cent and rising. No wonder in a recent Essential Poll the proportion of Australians who thought “the system” was working well for them recorded a pitiful 6 per cent.


At every turn, the political class is dragging us down. The left-versus-right squabble between renewables and coal-fired power has given us a Third World energy system, with rising prices and a zany South Australian government barely able to keep the lights on.
Cross-party support for Big Australia immigration levels is driving up housing prices, hurting local jobseekers and clogging our roads and trains.


Meanwhile, Canberra can’t stop feeding the beast of public spending and bureaucracy — cementing a 49 per cent top marginal tax rate that punishes economic success and leaves small businesspeople and professionals working every second day for the government.

Our children are also copping it. The tripartisan neglect of teacher quality has lowered the academic results of schools to a standard worse than Borat’s Kazakhstan.


There’s even a law called 18C that persecutes university students trying to access computer labs to finish their assignments. While civility conservatives are paralysed on these issues, the so-called moderate wing of the Liberal Party has caved in altogether.


Thirty years ago Labor was overrun by machine politics. Now the same thing has happened to the Liberals, with a single person, Michael Photios, controlling the entire NSW division. Machine politics is not only about spin, manipulation and cynical ways of winning elections, it’s also addicted to policy compromise.


This is why Labor and the Liberals now look so similar — they have both surrendered to the same lobby groups. Their insiders’ club is overflowing with opportunism, rorting and policy accommodation.


Without these institutionalised failings, the rise of the outsiders wouldn’t be possible.


The voters spot a dud government miles away.


Each key element of Trumpism is a manifestation of this process: a noninterventionist foreign policy, nation-first economic strategies, tough-minded immigration restrictions, abolishing cultural Marxism programs and a determination to drain the swamp of political compromise and corruption.


In Australia and beyond, the conservative establishment is bleeding to death. Trump, Hanson and Bernardi didn’t do it to them. Their wounds are entirely self-inflicted.

Mark Latham Telegraph 14/02/2017

12 comments

Brocky, thank you for going to the trouble of doing that...much appreciated!!! :)

I realise this is s long post by Mark Latham But it really is worth a read for anyone wondering what has happened to our lack of faith in pollies. 

 

Brocky, you will learn that most people on here won't read long posts and it is easy to overcome the paid bit to access the items.  Everyone can do it.

You don't need to pay you just override it.

Sandi, yes it came usually be overcome by going to Google and putting in certain pharases from the article in question but on this occasion it proved difficult.  I tried numerous time and was barred and I think others tried too :)

Sandi of people don't want to read the article , that is purely their choice. 

I read a lot myself , and probably wrongly , assume that others are equally interested . 

No matter if you lean left or right I think Lathams article is a condemnation for a lack of conviction in our politics . 

The reason I copied it was Toots was having difficulty accessing it and Radish was looking for a way to access . 

I just copied and pasted to save Radish the trouble .

 

If readers can't fsce s long article . This extract is the core of what Latham is saying . 

Not from an extremists view point . But an ex leader of the Labor party . 

He is in the mold of Hawke who had the courage to face up to entrenched interests for fundamental change that had set us up for the longest run of prosperity in any country ,

 

 

"Can you think of an Australian leader who’s petrified by the thought of dismantling the ABC, SBS, the Human Rights Commission and the cultural Marxism dominating our university and school systems?


Since 2013 we’ve had two of them, actually — Turnbull and Tony Abbott — both as ineffective as each other in fighting for freedom. This is the problem with what I call civility conservatives. They pay too much homage to institutions, frozen into believing that change can only come at a respectfully slow and gradual pace.
Meanwhile the bourgeois inner-city left has raced ahead with its infiltration of public institutions — using them as a platform for depicting everyday Australians as racist, bigoted, wife-bashing monsters.


It is an outrageous slandering of good people by taxpayer-funded snobs. And neither Turnbull nor Bill Shorten have lifted a finger to stop it.
In fact, there’s tripartisan support (Liberal, Labor and Greens) for funding the government agencies culturally at war with suburban and regional Australia.


This is what the current parliament is presiding over: institutions that hector and harangue people, telling them it’s wrong to love Australia Day, to wave the flag, to sing the anthem, to celebrate the virtues of our majority European heritage."

Interesting article Brocky...thanks for putting it up.. saved me the trouble of trying to find it...

Thank you Thea ,Radish ,Toot and Sandi for showing interest in the article . 

I would be interested in your thoughts on Mark Lathams points .

 

Brocky..I can't write a lot right now...having a couple of hungry grandchildren descending on me shortly...however...

My feeling is.. if Australia is to continue the present prosperity we're enjoying at the moment...and contrary to what some may think..we are pretty lucky in this country..then we need economically sound policies...

Too many wish to see things happen over night..but in all successful economies..good policies are those that focus on achieving long term growth.. 

Of course for this to happen we have to make it happen..we need to turn our attention to achieving long term productivity and not just concentrate on short term profit...

What I am basically getting at I suppose is that we have to consider future generations and the policies we design must bear in mind the security of the living standards of our children's children..

We can't have our cake and eat it all the time...we have to "leave a little salt on the plate" (Jewish saying)...I don't know if I have addressed anything Mark Latham has said..but these are the thoughts I have...

Cheers..

 

 

 

 


Thea I agree with everything you say. 

We are a lucky country and have had 27 years of uninterrupted growth ,I also agree that future prosperity depends on productivity . 

It is how to obtain this is the problem of local politics .

i must say at 75 I have given up on local tweedle dee tweedle dum local politics and find far more interesting UK USA movements 

Thanks for the full article Brocky.

Can you think of an Australian leader who’s petrified by the thought of dismantling the ABC, SBS, the Human Rights Commission and the cultural Marxism dominating our university and school systems?

Meanwhile the bourgeois inner-city left has raced ahead with its infiltration of public institutions — using them as a platform for depicting everyday Australians as racist, bigoted, wife-bashing monsters.

It is an outrageous slandering of good people by taxpayer-funded snobs.

What does this infer?

This kind of extreme language scares me and seems to smack of an obsessive desire to belittle those who stand up for equal rights, freedom and democracy.

PC agendas, pandering to minorities and OTT attempts to accommodate the unfortunate get up our nose at times and do cause problems ... but what is Mr Latham suggesting?

Patriotism/idealism to the brink of extinction and foul repression like the Hitler Holocaust, Kim Jong-un, ISIS etc. etc.

Dangerous attention-seeking talk from our resident Mr Motormouth IMO.

R&R I don't see where Latham is using extreme language. 

He maybe raising concerns of those that think about such things , as the overstepping of the Mark by the Himan Rights Commission or the funding by the taxpayers of institutions that the non political Australians see as against there own interests . 

But to accuse him of promoting Nationslism in line with Hitler I think only turns those who don't normally engage in political debate off .

surely such response only confirms what he is saying That voters are tired of being spoken down to .

This article by Mark Latham seems to have been totally ignored by the PC crowd . Why ?

 

There is a lot of truth in what Latham says.

 

There is a growing class of people who are saying enough is enough.

 

For a long time citizens were happy to put up with politic correctness because there was a dare I say it, selective and principled approach for the greater good.

 

I think socuial engineering has gone too far, and now people are havintg too much PC shoved down their throats that they are gagging and spewing it back at the pollies

We have reached to quote a PC term - the tipping point

About bloody time

We are living through a historic upheaval of the liberal democratic model. Brexit voters said no to the status quo of the liberal democratic model that tied Britain to Europe for more than four decades. Trump’s base said no to the status quo model in Washington, DC; no to the do-nothing politics of Obama over the past eight years; no to a two-party system of insiders who have forgotten the outsiders; no to core tenets of the Republican Party such as free trade; no to the signalling of faux virtue by the espousers of identity politics that divides, rather than unites, people; no to the values divide where transgender bathrooms and hurt feelings attract more political action than national security measures or immigration controls; no to a virulent form of political correctness that shuts down free speech in the country of the First Amendment; and no to the sanctimony and ego of Hollywood stars who think memorising a few lines gives them political oomph.
Janet Albrechstein

12 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment