married rate

Iam at a loss to accept the differing rate of an aged pensions Iam married my wife gets no pension, I receive $200 less to support 2 people my wife is 66 and has no income and lacks the residancy period by a few years

If the govenment dont wish to give her any income support thats fine i dont expect a handout

  I have the married rate of aged pension I receive $200 less because Iam married, you need to be single and sit in your chair in your beige cardigan and slippers alone until you die, however the bonus for being on your own is more income support for all things like power, more support its all the things that they say two can live more cheaply as one can, who worked that equation out ? power consumption for example is cooking different food her being a Chinese lady, hairdryers, showering hot water consumption but I receive $62 a single receives $75 I  get the lessor rate of pension my wife cannot work she has no assets to pool I should receive a  pension more  than the reduced rates of everything

Turnbulls Jobs and Growth is all they think of, revenue cutting pensions etc balance of payments Welfare is a dirty word

 I have worked in this country for 40 years and paid my tax

 I can only say DONT GET MARRIED if you are on an Aged pension also keep clear of Centrelink if you can by making sure you have a retirement fund that you can draw on, I didnt have such superannuation in my working life only for a few years its not "pity me" its fact, I support 2 people on $200 less than a single person thats the gripe

 

3 comments

Dolbt60, yes it is a nonsensical policy just designed to save money. I am in exactly the same position and I sympathise with you. I am 70 and have been taking part time work just to make ends meet. I presented what I believed was a sound argument in favour of retaining my single rate, but this was completely ignored and the money reduced. The government is actually telling you whom you can marry with this policy. Bizarre,  but there it is.

Many thanks for yuor reply Gozitano itis very bizzare I wrote to Chrisian Porter over this all I received back was its the way it is sort of a very carefully worded letter its a waste of time trying to bring your point of view to theit notice its all about like you say saving money I cannot accept the power allowance for singgles being $75 and  $62 for parnered I have written to my MP over this situation

 The thing is this, in a nutshell if you are married and each person receives a pension then the situation is acceptable, however no considerration has ever been given to other factors like one person qualifying for a pension and the other receiving nothing if you are married or partnered its one law for all situations, the percentage of difference between the married rate and single rate is not fair, single people are far better off. Kevin Rudd was resonsible for raising the single pension (vote collection) he did nothing but reduce the married rate so many people just accept this situation maybe we should live in different homes and claim the single pension or divorce ones partner at the guidance of Centrelink

I agree with what you say %100.My wife is new to australia ,been here 10 months.She is 51 i am 65. She gets no help from C/L for two years, i get married rate of lousy penshion . She has full work rites and went and found a job two hrs a night .Her last pay was $489 a fortnight.So C/l reduced my penshion even further by $42 .  If she COULD get the dole she would get a littl more money and i would get a full penshion.How crazy is that?   I am born and bread %100 Australian.  I chose to marry a philippino for the first time at age 64.  (huge mistake) financialy.  As a coupple with no kids,no super. we are being crippled by our owne governments.   I think we should be given our penshions with no reductions, after all the money will only go back into the aconamy .   its a discrace.

I object to the discrimination against couples. The theory ''two can live more cheaply'' is fine, but the reality is that two singles can co-habitate to save costs just as easily as a married couple - and they do! And when one partner doesn't qualify for a pension, for whatever reason, the unfairness magnifies. All pensioners should receive the same. (Thankfully, I am not a pensioner and hopefully never will be! I feel sorry for those who have to deal with Centrelink, the nastiness and disrespect of some who think pensioners are second rate citizens, and the insecurity and fear the government creates with it's constant fiddling with the system!)

3 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment