PM and treasurer bill taxpayers for private jet to Lachlan Murdoch\'s Christmas p

Scott Morrison and Josh Frydenberg flew from Canberra to Sydney and back overnight to attend the media heir’s soiree at a cost of almost $5,000

and

Flight logs published by the Department of Defence show the pair, along with ministers Peter Dutton and Stuart Robert, took the jet to Sydney at a cost of $2,153. Dutton did not respond to questions about whether he attended the party. Robert was in Sydney for official parliamentary business and did not attend the party.

Media reports show that both Morrison and Frydenberg did attend. While in Sydney, Frydenberg charged taxpayers for the use of Comcars, but not any additional expenses for accommodation.

Early the next morning, records show Morrison, Frydenberg and Dutton flew back to Canberra, again on the jet, this time at a cost of $2,583.

Morrison and Dutton arrived back in time to hold a media event at 9am at Canberra airport to discuss new anti-terrorism measures.

Frydenberg then billed taxpayers $486 to fly home to Melbourne from Canberra, while Dutton flew home to Brisbane, again via Sydney, at a cost of $831.

The use of the prime minister’s jet alone cost about $4,736. The trip to Sydney cannot have lasted more than 14 hours.

?The Boeing 737 Business Jet is one of six RAAF “special purpose” planes used by senior ministers and dignitaries when commercial flights are either unavailable or deemed unsuitable for the journey.

The former finance minister Mathias Cormann has been given the use of a Dassault Falcon 7X aircraft from the same fleet to travel around Europe as part of his bid for the top job at the OECD, costing taxpayers a reported $4,300 per hour. The final bill for Cormann’s use of the aircraft won’t be known until next year when the Department of Defence publishes flight logs for 2020.

The rules on using the special purpose aircraft require that it be done for the dominant purpose of parliamentary business and the expense must represent value for money.

Morrison lives in Sydney and was travelling with his family from Canberra, giving him at least some explanation for the trip.

But Frydenberg, despite repeated questions from the Guardian, has failed to explain how his trip to Sydney constituted parliamentary business or answer whether the Murdoch party was his primary purpose for travel.

There is no other public record of Frydenberg engaging in official business while in Sydney, nor was there much of a time window to conduct any such business, given the hour at which they flew back to Canberra the morning after the Murdoch party.

In 2017, following an expenses scandal involving Sussan Ley, the former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull introduced new rules governing the use of expenses.

The new expenses regime introduced a formal “pub test” – meaning MPs should consider “how the public would perceive their use” of travel resources – and also required them to be prepared to publicly justify their expenses.

“Australians are entitled to expect that politicians spend taxpayers’ money carefully, ensuring at all times that their work expenditure represents an efficient, effective and ethical use of public resources,” Turnbull said at the time.

“We should be, as politicians, backbenchers and ministers, we should be as careful and as accountable with taxpayers’ money as we possibly can be.”

Comment was sought from the offices of Morrison, Dutton, Frydenberg and Robert. A spokesman for Robert was the only one to respond, giving a schedule of official business conducted in Sydney and confirming non-attendance at the party.

5 comments

It should be pointed out that all of the travel mentioned above is allowed for under the guidelines for ministers and the PM. Misuse of travel has been done for decades by all MP's, regardless of whether they were in government or not. Whilst it's easy to snipe at the current government, perhaps a balance could be made of rorts during the Gillard years. One of her staffers was being wed at Tweed Heads and Gillard arranged for an RAAF jet to transport her to Coolangatta to announce a new road. Forget that the announcement had already been made some months before. Gillard flew up on the Friday and back on the Sunday. By sheer coincidence that was the weekend of the staffer's wedding which Gillard attended. All flights and accommodation at taxpayers expense because it was an "official" visit.

Instead of singling out the misuse of travel rorts, we should be canvassing the government to change the rules. When an official visit happens to combine with a private function then the costs should be split to allow for the taxpayer to pay some and the MP should be required to pay for some, the proportions to be worked out by Treasury.


It's sad that all the Guardian has to report is the flight details of a few politicians. Is there nothing else to report on?

The Government are very pally with Murdock -- and trying to get rid of the ABC -- they have already cut 84 MILLION off the ABC they did not like the 4 corners program that showed up the bad behavior of a few of their ministers -- which we have every right to know about -- why they have to be so pally with the Murdock and other private media is because the ABC is more truthful -- and is not in any way left-leaning like they say -- they rip it into the left AND THE right

Also the Guardian is one of the better and more honest news places

Same as usual, Libs, looking after Big Business and anyone who has a story to report about Rorts and Corruption is Called a Lefty. Its the easiest thing to say when your caught out. Sick of it and we need a change.

We sure do need a change Louballs

5 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment