Telstra refunds $9.3m to 72,000 customers

Telstra has refunded $9.3 million to 72,000 customers it misled in relation to its ‘Premium Direct Billing’ (PDB) third-party billing service, according to a report it provided to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).

In April 2018, the Federal Court ordered Telstra to pay penalties of $10 million for making false or misleading representations about charges for digital content, such as games and ringtones.

Telstra also committed to undertake a consumer remediation program, which has resulted in the $9.3 million of refunds to date.

“We are pleased to see so many customers refunded by Telstra. It’s clear a large number were charged for content like ringtones and wallpapers that they did not want, did not use, and had difficulty unsubscribing from,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said.

“Following our action, Telstra has paid close to $20 million in penalties and refunds. This should serve as a warning to all telecommunication providers that misleading and deceiving customers will result in serious consequences.”

Telstra committed to providing refunds to customers it could identify in its complaint records and those who contacted Telstra or the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman directly.

Telstra customers who believe unauthorised PDB charges were applied to their accounts or prepaid service are encouraged to contact Telstra directly on 1800 007 763 (post-paid customers), 1800 007 413 (prepaid customers) or 1800 007 830 (business customers).

“We’d encourage current or former Telstra customers to contact Telstra for a refund if they believe there were unauthorised charges on their account because of the PDB service,” Mr Sims said.

“The ACCC is also conducting a detailed investigation into the third party billing services of other carriers and further enforcement action may well follow.”

5 comments

Yes - they made a mistake and have now rectified the issue. I congratulate Telstra for doing the right thing

Ha ha ha ha ha ha. A mistake, rubbish. They where knowingly price gouging etc customers & got caught out. Those in charge that set up these gouging plans then set them in place & enforced the gouging should be heavily fined & charged with fraud. These top end bosses (a better name would be parasite or leech) are no better than a common theif & should be dealt with the same way. But as always nothing will happen to these low lifes.

And congratulating them for doing the right thing, ROFLMAO, They got caught out, stealing from customers, & you congratulate them, congratulate thievery, what a poor soul you are Olbaid

No Billy - the customers signed up for products inadvertently and either didnt unsubscribe or didnt know how to

Telstra has repaid them . It was only a pittance amount - average $129 per customer.

We all know that a lot of these payments need not have been refunded . The ACCC was being overzealous and its a publicity stunt on their part

It was no "mistake" dumbell. They did the wrong thing and must now pay up.

Quite so Ray, thanks to the ACCC, we're getting somewhere!

Telstra is a beast with similarities to other members in it's family, it's aunty the ABC and now the less reliant CBA. They all have a culture of disdain for the general public. Now this is very odd because Telstra and the ABC have received $$$BILLIONS from taxpayers. One would wonder how such a culture developes over the years? Well it helps if you start by hiring people who dont have a liking for customer service, guarantee a constant and reliable cashflow from taxpayers, then you make the organisation accountable to only themselves. I think Telstra could recruit more shareholders if they demonstrated a more reliable, efficient and effective system of customer service. I have seen some improvement over the last 20 years but the offshoring of CS jobs was a move in the wrong direction in my opinion.

As far as I can see Telstra was well aware of the problem, admits it, and failed to address it even after a large number of customer complaints.

Note: Telstra had set the PDB as the default on customer’s phones and the system didn’t require any further “permissions” i.e. ‘allow’ or ID verification before services were billed.

Because Telstra failed to address the problem themselves … the ACCC commenced proceedings against Telstra on 26 March 2018.

From the ACCC, 26 March 2018

Background:

The ACCC and Telstra have agreed on the following facts to be presented to the Federal Court for its consideration:

• Since July 2013, Telstra has been operating its “Premium Direct Billing” (PDB). The service allows Telstra customers to purchase digital content from third-party developers that sell their content outside usual app marketplaces like Google Play or the App Store. Charges are automatically applied to Telstra customers’ pre-paid or post-paid mobile accounts.
• Telstra did not adequately inform customers it had set the PDB system as a default on customers’ mobile accounts and that if customers accessed content through the PDB service, even unintentionally, they would be billed directly by Telstra.
• Telstra was aware from early 2015 to at least June 2016, not least because it received a large number of calls disputing such charges, that the operation of the PDB service had led to a significant number of its customers unintentionally purchasing and being billed for PDB content subscriptions without their knowledge or consent. The number of affected customers was in the order of tens of thousands and possibly in excess of 100,000.
• Telstra failed to implement the identity verification safeguards for the PDB service which it used for other third party subscription services to authorise the charges (such as the customer entering a PIN or signing into an account).
• Telstra was aware that family members such as children were at risk of inadvertently subscribing on a family member’s phone.
• Until October 2017 Telstra had earned about $61.7m in net revenue from commissions on premium billing services charged to more than 2.7 million mobile numbers.

Source: https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/telstra-misled-customers-over-premium-billing-charges

That's the ACCC's version.

Biased and a PR stunt for public consumption

It was cheaper for Telstra to just agree with the ACCC and refund the $9.3 million than fight the stupid bureaucrats

Yeh, yeh Olbaid. Of course LOL.

ACCC: "The ACCC and Telstra have agreed on the following facts to be presented to the Federal Court ..."

OLBAID: "Biased and a PR stunt for public consumption"

How do you know that for a fact by the way?

Unfortunately, I am unable to divulge that information, as it will compromise my sources from within Telstra's and the ACC's top managment 

You just have to take my word for it my dear. 

Well fair enough oh mighty one.

Olbaid :reversed: Diablo >>> self-acclaimed connections >>> Telstra and the ACCC [minus one C] 'managment' [minus one e] .

So funny. Love your contributions.

Bah - spelling errors and omissions. Who has time for such trivialities

One has more important issues at hand.

I told Telstra's CEO to call me after he's done with his Board Meeting. Not happy with the reduced dividend payout this year. And to think I mentored the bloke 

I’ve always hated Telstra. Back in the days when they had a monopoly they ripped off everyone bigtime!!! Telstra has always been a greedy corporation with many sneaky ways to suck money from their customers and it does not surprise me in the least that they sourced yet another way to do precisely that!

5 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment