Who’ll pay the price for flight shaming?

‘Flight shaming’ is becoming more widespread and could cost airlines billions.

Who’ll pay the price for flight shaming?

Guilt over the toll air travel takes on the environment is becoming more and more commonplace, with customers looking for ways to offset the carbon emissions caused by their flights or looking for altogether different modes of transport.

“‘Flight shaming’ is gaining traction and it could cost airlines billions,” says global bank Citi, which also claims that over the next five years the cost of carbon offsetting leisure travel alone will reach $3.8 billion per year, with the potential for that number to be 10 times higher.

airplane vapour trails on a sunny morning sky

While this could be tragic news for airlines, rail operators and sustainable tour operators, among other businesses, could be beneficiaries as consumers pay more attention to their carbon footprint and carbon offsetting becomes “big business”, reports CNBC.

The cost to airlines could be catastrophically high and will either be absorbed by the consumer or the airline.

Either way, the airlines lose out, as the higher price of flights to the consumer could also lead to an air travel slowdown.

“If this burden were to be fully absorbed by the consumer, our price elasticity analysis shows that there would be a shortfall in volume growth of -0.4 per cent per annum vs. current forecasts. And while this does not sound detrimental, if this onus were to fall on the (largely fixed cost base) airlines, the cost of carbon offsetting all leisure consumption could be as much as 27 per cent of airlines’ profits by 2025,” wrote analyst Mark Manduca.

The cost of offsetting corporate travel will cost another $2.4 billion, reducing airline profits by an additional 17 per cent. Again, that actual cost could be 10 times higher.

Aside from rail and sustainable tourism operators, governments, forest landowners and carbon plans will benefit from this trend, as carbon offsetting projects often include planting trees and invest in green spaces that reduce greenhouse gasses and counteract carbon emissions.

Citi speculates that airlines may get creative and shame customers into paying for carbon offsetting.

“We hypothesise that some airlines will ‘reward’ customers who choose to offset their carbon footprint by granting them a green seat on an aircraft. Meanwhile, customers who do not offset will be allocated a red one and placed into a state of ‘shame’,” said Citi.

Do you carbon offset your flights?

If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.

RELATED ARTICLES





    COMMENTS

    To make a comment, please register or login
    Cat
    9th Nov 2019
    8:04am
    Carbon emissions is another reason that adds to all the other reasons to look for alternatives. The excessive cost of parking your car at the airport or the airport taxi fares, the cost of decent kennels to leave pets at just makes me relent and think why am I doing this when there is something local I could visit. I decided I'm going to drive up to the Barrier Reefi instead of flying to see more along the way to get more out of the trip and have the convenience of having my car with me and not having to pay enormous cost of renting a car and airport taxis on top of airfares. The thought of carbon emissions had some effect of making me feel even more like this is the better decision and that is influencing all my future plans too.
    SuziJ
    9th Nov 2019
    12:40pm
    My sentiments exactly. I prefer to drive to Melbourne, board the Spirit of Tasmania and drive off when I get to Devonport, knowing that I am comfortable in my own car. Even being able to sleep overnight on board, and take whatever you need with you, except, of course fresh food products.

    There are some that don't want to do the 9 hour crossing, but that's just a part of the experience (in my opinion). I'd rather do the crossing than having to transit 3 airports (home, Melbourne & where ever I land in Tassie), having a limited checked luggage allowance, then having to hire a car, which is expensive.

    If you check out the return prices for going via the Spirit with you car onboard, and a sleeping cabin, including from $99 single journey specials, and the air fares and hiring a car, the Spirit journey comes out so much cheaper :)


    Join YOURLifeChoices, it’s free

    • Receive our daily enewsletter
    • Enter competitions
    • Comment on articles

    You May Like