Aged care sector unites to target marginal seats at next election

Font Size:

The final report from the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety will land on 26 February, and Australia’s aged care sector is getting on the front foot to ensure that the recommendations are implemented.

The six leading aged care bodies have united under one banner and are planning to target older voters in marginal seats in the lead-up to the next election to demand action in the sector.

The Australian Aged Care Collaboration (AACC), launched on Monday, has brought together more than 1000 organisations that deliver 70 per cent of government-subsidised aged care services to 1.3 million Australians. It includes not-for-profit providers, primarily church and other charity organisations, and a number of private operators, as a new single industry voice delivering quality care for older Australians.

AACC representatives Sean Rooney and Patricia Sparrow said more than 20 government aged-care reviews in 20 years had failed to fix the inadequate system.

“After 20 years of missed opportunities, Australia cannot let the release of the final royal commission report later this month pass without taking real action,” Ms Sparrow said.

“Australia currently spends about half of what other comparable countries do on looking after their most vulnerable older citizens.

“Enough is enough – Australia should no longer accept the drip-feed of piecemeal rescue packages and ad-hoc changes.”

Mr Rooney said the residential aged care sector was in crisis with 64 per cent of homes operating at a loss in 2020, almost double the medium-term average of 33 per cent.

“Under-resourcing of the aged care system has been growing for a long time and is not the fault of any one government or parliament,” he said. “But it is the responsibility of all parliamentarians to recognise the injustice and inequity of maintaining a system the royal commission described as ‘a shocking tale of neglect’.”

The AACC has made a campaign advertisement that highlights the issues relating to the system and released a report titled It’s Time To Care About Aged Care that identifies the 30 members of the 151-member Federal Parliament who represent the ‘oldest’ Australian communities by age.

See the advertisement below:

Of these seats, 15 are marginal, and in some cases are held by only a few hundred votes. They contain 814,950 voters aged over 55, an extraordinarily concentrated voting bloc.

“The 30 members of Parliament who represent Australia’s ‘oldest’ electorates have the greatest opportunity to represent the needs of their communities, so that older Australians are finally given the respect, resources and support they deserve,” Mr Rooney said.

“The Australian community looks to these elected officials to stand up for them in the national debate and to help influence positive outcomes on behalf of their constituents.

“These MPs have the opportunity to truly achieve something great – and avoid the mistakes of the past – by creating a sustainable and equitable aged care system that will stand the test of time.”

According to information contained in the AACC report, Australia devotes less than half of what comparable countries do to aged care (1.2 per cent of GDP versus 2.5 per cent of GDP), while countries such as Denmark and Sweden devote around 4 per cent of GDP to aged care.

The report also highlights that around 16,000 vulnerable Australians died in 2017-18 while waiting for a government subsidised support package in their own home.

More than 4.1 million Australians, or almost 16 per cent of the population, are aged over 65. By 2057, that will rise to 8.8 million, or 22 per cent of the population, and by 2097 it will reach 12.8 million people, or one in four Australians.

“The challenges for aged care are only going to grow in coming years as the large baby boomer generation requires more support,” Ms Sparrow said.

Do you think the government should increase funding to the aged care sector? Do you think the government will increase funding to the aged care sector?

If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.

Join YourLifeChoices today
and get this free eBook!

By joining YourLifeChoices you consent that you have read and agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy


Report reveals whether money buys you better aged care

Research reveals differences and concerns in facilities with more government-supported residents.

Home care package waiting lists slammed as a 'critical failure'

There are almost 100,000 elderly Australians who are waiting for funding to access their approved

The emotional aspects of moving house in retirement

Retirement coach Jon Glass recently moved house and shares his insights.

Written by Ben


Total Comments: 5
  1. 3

    Politicians beware! If the result of the Queensland election is any indicator, seniors can certainly cause seats to change. The recent Queensland election gave that government more seats and the reason for that was said to be older people voted for the government because they felt that it had kept them safe from the pandemic.

  2. 0

    I think the LNP. are safe for one more term Murdoch will make sure of that , they do not deserve it but sad to say this will happen.

  3. 1

    I’m in no way associated with AACC, but I think it is time all of we over 65’s voted to correct the anomaly. We put in the labor to build this country and paid our dues and taxes for years, but politicians who only care about themselves are squandering what we built and stealing from the public, apparently without any punishment. They clearly don’t give a damn about we elders and their messages are clear: we are a problem the country would be better off without. Well maybe our votes will show them who the country would be better off without. Maybe there are other seats besides these 30 where our votes will also make a difference. Come on over 65s, vote for a better deal.

  4. 0

    Please check out the policies of each party, then decide, as a rule of thumb do not follow any advice given by the Murdock press or TV, recent election history has proven that they resort to half truths or unfounded rumors, are not honest and use scare mongering tactics, so try to get another view. We can move from the slash welfare and introduce tax cuts policies of this government, even if it means (horror) supporting socialists

    • 0

      “Please check out the policies of each party, then decide, as a rule of thumb do not follow any advice given”by anyone on this forum!



continue reading


How to … fall back asleep

Waking up at night and struggling to get back to sleep can be stressful and exhausting. According to WebMB, around...


Curing the incurable: Why some patients make astounding recoveries

As a GP and someone who works in the holistic health field, Dr Jerry Thompson has long been interested in...


The 'ism' that's rife and no, it's not okay

Ageism, like all 'isms', creates a social hierarchy and disadvantages people based on an aspect of their diversity. Compared to...


When conversations become a competition

Australia has a well-deserved reputation for being a very competitive nation on the world stage. Perhaps it dates back to...


Wakey wakey - a history of alarm clocks

Matthew S. Champion, Australian Catholic University Australians are returning to our normal rhythms. The first beats of the day are...


The top-selling-souvenir from every country in the world

Do you buy souvenirs to remember your overseas holidays? If so, we imagine you have been looking at these very...


ACCC to keep a keen eye on travel issues this year

Australia's consumer watchdog expects to have its hands busy dealing with COVID-affected travel complaints this year. In his annual address...


Cruisers turn to superyachts to satisfy their cruise cravings

Typically, Australia is one of, if not, the biggest cruise market in the world. It wasn't so long ago that...