Less red tape, greater flexibility in new super rules

Less red tape, more flexibility expected after overhaul.

Super fund rules revised

Less red tape and more flexibility would result from a decision to expand the number of members allowed in a self-managed super fund (SMSF) from four to six, the Federal Government says.

Speaking at an SMSF Expo in Melbourne, Revenue and Financial Services Minister Kelly O’Dwyer said that given recent growth in the sector, the move would “ensure SMSFs remain compelling retirement savings vehicles”.

In announcing that SuperStream (the system that transmits money and information across the super system between employers, funds, service providers and the ATO) would be extended to include SMSF rollovers, she said: “This reform will allow SMSF members to initiate and receive rollovers electronically between an APRA (Australian Prudential Regulation Authority) fund and their SMSF.

“This will reduce compliance costs, expedite the rollover process and further improve the integrity of the super system.”

Ms O’Dwyer said the reforms were expected to take effect late next year.

“We will have some further positive announcements in the Budget,” she said, but added that the Government had “no intention of making any further changes to the taxation of super”.

A spokesperson for the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) said the proposed change would have no impact on an individual’s experience in setting up an SMSF.

“Any individuals wanting to start an SMSF will still be required to go through a rigorous process of establishing an SMSF and registering it with the ATO,” she said. “Once an SMSF is established, however, it will become easier and quicker for SMSF trustees to move monies between an SMSF and an APRA regulated fund.”

SMSF Association chief executive John Maroney said the group had lobbied for the changes for more than five years.

He said the expansion from four to six would benefit family groups that wanted to include parents, children and, potentially, children’s spouses in a single SMSF.

“Currently, family groups may need to have multiple SMSFs to accommodate more than four members, so this proposal will allow a single SMSF for the group, bringing the benefits of reduced costs and greater scale,” Mr Maroney said.

Including SMSF rollovers in SuperStream was a big improvement, he said.

“This change to the mechanics of the super system is important to SMSFs. Currently, SMSFs can experience lengthy delays in receiving rollovers from large superannuation funds, so this change will ensure rollovers are made in a timely manner, enhancing choice and efficiency in the superannuation system.

“This will minimise friction between various parts of the super system and also reduce the time it takes for SMSF members to access their retirement savings held in large funds.”



    To make a comment, please register or login
    Not a Bludger
    1st May 2018
    Why wait until late next year - why not now?
    1st May 2018
    Because it will be after the election - extra sweeteners on this side and a hit on share dividends on the other! But there is a long way to go and changes to super are a fact of life. In the end Govts will only be able to bleed the people who accumulated something. The others are always with you if you just offer them some crumbs.
    Not a Bludger
    1st May 2018
    Too true, CJ.
    Old Geezer
    1st May 2018
    I really can't see how this will make any difference to most SMSFs.
    Not a Bludger
    1st May 2018
    Maybe not, OG but it would to those families with mum, dad + 3 plus kids currently running two funds at twice the costs of one fund.
    Old Geezer
    1st May 2018
    Gee my kids are in a separate fund and it doesn't cost any more to have two funds.
    Not a Bludger
    1st May 2018
    In which case, OG, the fund to which you refer does not have an accountant charging fees, an auditor charging fees, ASIC registration costs and the like.
    2nd May 2018
    And therefore it's not compliant! OG, sometimes your protestations go too far and are quite clearly fanciful. Why can't you acknowledge that the status quo can be improved upon?
    Old Geezer
    1st May 2018
    This might be of interest.

    2nd May 2018
    Why does a long term forced savings plan need to be changed every week???
    I'm not against a regular review but the changes to superannuation have been hard to believe.
    3rd May 2018
    These changes make sense though. SMSFs will continue to be a more favoured option.
    4th May 2018
    Why the delays in rollovers from large super funds? You don't suppose they are big industry funds begrudging member loss. Well if that's the case the fund managers will have to earn their enormous pay packets by continuously re-evaluating asset mix. It must hurt to put on extra staff to deal with redemptions, particularly when a massive expenditure on advertising is failing?

    Join YOURLifeChoices, it’s free

    • Receive our daily enewsletter
    • Enter competitions
    • Comment on articles