Cost of imports to skyrocket

Font Size:

In a bid to level the playing field between digital and bricks-and-mortar sales, the Government is planning to increase the GST on imported products such as those purchased online.

Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey hinted last week that he had “found a way to ensure that those providing goods from overseas into Australia do not get any advantage out of the tax-free threshold”. He is now reportedly pushing a plan to reduce the GST-free low value threshold (LVT) on goods bought online from $1000 to $20.

The new rule would be applied from July 2017 should his proposal be approved by state treasurers at a Treasurers’ meeting next month.

Australians spent $17.1 billion online in the last year. Around $4 billion of this went to overseas online megastores such as Amazon, with none going back into the Australian economy.

A similar idea has been floated in the past, but analysis showed that the cost of administering such a scheme would far outweigh the potential gains. It was estimated that lowering the threshold to $20 would bring in $550 million but cost $2 billion to process.

The Government’s proposal is another show of support for small business, which struggles to compete with online retailers.

“We’ve now found a way to ensure that those providing goods from overseas, into Australia, do not get any advantage out of the tax free threshold,’’ said Mr Hockey. “This is hugely important for small business.”

The Treasurer and his assistant will propose the Government’s plan to state treasurers on 21 August.

Read more at Sydney Morning Herald.



Opinion: Who foots the bill?

This move may level the playing field between small business and online retailers, but at what cost to the Australian consumer?

Lowering the GST-free threshold, or low value threshold (LVT), on imported goods will remove one more way in which consumers can potentially get ahead of the high prices we already pay for goods in this country.

How much more will we pay for imported goods? Consumer advocate CHOICE estimates that Australian consumers could pay mark ups in the vicinity of 256 per cent on goods under $100 by the time they pay the proposed GST and processing fees.

There are arguments that Britain, Canada and the US all have GST applied to goods valued at less than $1000 (Canada C$20, Britain £15 and the US applies tax to all imported goods). But there is also evidence that Australians buy online for the wider range of products available to them, as well as to lower costs.

Assistant Treasurer Josh Frydenberg may argue that the current threshold is “fundamentally unfair”, but the countries he’s measuring against have much larger populations and a wider range of choice, so this proposal will not only increase the cost of goods, but also further reduce the buying options available to Australian consumers. It is likely that it will make online shopping no longer an option for most of us.

By reducing the LVT, it is more likely that consumers will foot the bill in the long run, making our country, which is already one of the most expensive places in the world to live even costlier. And it’s another example of a Government trying to stick it to the little guy.

Even the Productivity Commission agrees that the cost of processing such a tax would be high – potentially higher than the perceived gains. Mr Hockey believes that advances in technology will make this process less expensive, but where are the figures to back up his statement?

It’s not that this tax should be ruled out completely, but lowering the threshold from $1000 to $20 will not only increase the cost of living for many Australians, it will also eliminate any leverage consumers have in keeping local business pricing competitive and fair.

Small business may be better off for Mr Hockey lowering the GST-free threshold, but it’s we, the consumer, who’ll foot the bill, and whose bottom line will be most affected.

What do you think? Do you shop online? Would you be happy paying more for imported goods? Will this proposed tax increase your cost of living? Do you think there’s a better way for the Government to boost our economy that doesn’t come at such a high cost to the consumer?

Written by Leon Della Bosca

Leon Della Bosca is a voracious reader who loves words. You'll often find him spending time in galleries, writing, designing, painting, drawing, or photographing and documenting street art. He has a publishing and graphic design background and loves movies and music, but then, who doesn’t?



Sign-up to the YourLifeChoices Enewsletter

continue reading

Superannuation News

Is your super fund heading for a double-digit year?

One year ago, the prospect of superannuation funds recording double-digit returns seemed inconceivable, but that it exactly where a lot...


Napping could help you stay mentally agile

We all have nights when we fall seriously short of the recommended eight hours of shut-eye, and the following day...

Health news

Link found between pro-inflammatory diets and 27 chronic diseases

Meghan Hockey, Deakin University and Wolfgang Marx, Deakin University Almost half of all Australians live with a chronic disease, which...

Aged Care

Friday Reflection: Why did I wait so long?

I'm ex-RNAS and ex-RNZN. Widowed, six years back, our bedrooms upstairs. Perfect, while both active. However, isn't there always a...


National Cabinet to fast-track COVID-19 vaccination for over 50s

Australia will fast-track its COVID-19 vaccine rollout for people older than 50 next month, as National Cabinet seeks to reset the...

Health Insurance

Six reasons your health fund won’t give you a better deal

Do you trust your health fund to give you a better deal? If you think you’re paying too much, it...


Monoclonal antibodies useful for fight against COVID variants

Monoclonal antibodies could prove a game changer for COVID-19 prevention after a trial found they reduced the risk of coronavirus...


Friday Funnies: Science says

  Here are five of the funniest jokes of all time. If you disagree, don’t blame us. Professor Robert Dunbar...