Questions raised over efficacy of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine

Font Size:

Questions have been raised over the efficacy of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, with the Australian and New Zealand Society for Immunology saying it may not be effective enough to generate herd immunity.

Herd immunity is when such a large portion of a population becomes immune to the point a virus can no longer transmit and is eliminated.

The plan to offer Pfizer injections for frontline workers and the highest priority cases followed by the AstraZeneca vaccine to much of the rest of the population has been questioned by immunologists.

Clinical trials show the AstraZeneca vaccine is 62 per cent effective when the recommended two doses are given, while the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are about 95 per cent effective.

While the AstraZeneca jab is safe and may prevent virus transmission, some experts say it’s not effective enough to achieve herd immunity.

“The AstraZeneca vaccine is not one I would be deploying widely, because of that lower efficacy,” Immunology Society president Professor Stephen Turner told The Sydney Morning Herald.

“But it could be used as a tool to blunt the effect of COVID until [more effective] vaccines could be deployed.”

Health Minister Greg Hunt said suggestions the AstraZeneca vaccine may be insufficient to achieve herd immunity in Australia were “clearly incorrect”.

“It’s important to note that the results also show up to 90 per cent effectiveness more generally with final results to come on AstraZeneca, and up to 100 per cent in relation to the severe illness,” Mr Hunt said, quoting results from a much smaller trial than the one which showed the 62 per cent efficacy rating.

“Personally, I’d much rather have AstraZeneca than nothing. I would have it tomorrow. It is a highly safe and effective vaccine.”

Professor Raina MacIntyre, head of the biosecurity program at the Kirby Institute at the University of NSW, said the vaccine may protect “against death and hospitalisation, but may not protect well against infection”.

“I do not believe the AstraZeneca vaccine – based on published phase 3 trial results – will be efficacious enough for herd immunity,” she said.

Other scientists agree.

“Why would we settle for the second-best option?” asked Dr Andrew Miller, president of the Australian Medical Association’s Western Australia branch.

The head of the Australian Medical Association in WA, Andrew Miller, urged the government to halt its plans to begin rolling out the AstraZeneca vaccine from March.

“We need to pause and look at what the outcomes are going to be before we take any further steps,” he said.

“With the AstraZeneca vaccine, on current data, if we rely on that vaccine we’re not going to get to herd immunity.

“Current expectation is we’re going to be able to get back to normal life, but if we don’t get herd immunity there’s no guarantee that we won’t have rolling epidemics.

“Once you have one vaccine, you may not be able to have other ones. That’s why it’s very important to get it right the first time.”

Australia has ordered enough AstraZeneca doses for 26.9 million people, Pfizer jabs for five million people and none of the Moderna vaccine.

While it is hoped the vaccines will provide extra protection against coronavirus infection, it remains unproven if any of the vaccines will actually prevent transmission.

Vaccinated people may still pass on the virus, so scientists are keen to establish herd immunity with a high vaccination rate in order to eliminate the virus.

Would you prefer to wait for a vaccine that is more affective, or are you happy to get one that is proven safe but may be less effective?

If you enjoy our content, don’t keep it to yourself. Share our free eNews with your friends and encourage them to sign up.

Join YourLifeChoices today
and get this free eBook!

By joining YourLifeChoices you consent that you have read and agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy


Vaccine doubts mean COVID restrictions could remain until 2022

Experts and politicians say restrictions may need to remain until March 2022.

What's the difference between the two COVID vaccines?

The wait for the vaccines that will protect the population is slowly shortening.

Vaccine unlikely to prevent transmission

Questions have been raised over the efficacy of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, with the Australian

Written by Leon Della Bosca

Leon Della Bosca is a voracious reader who loves words. You'll often find him spending time in galleries, writing, designing, painting, drawing, or photographing and documenting street art. He has a publishing and graphic design background and loves movies and music, but then, who doesn’t?



Total Comments: 5
  1. 2

    More effective, please!

  2. 1

    “Once you have one vaccine, you may not be able to have other ones. That’s why it’s very important to get it right the first time.” This comment means caution is required. Let’s listen to the experts, not the politicians who just want the pats on their backs.

  3. 0

    Once again YLC would have to be the most paranoia invoking news forum going around.
    So here we are with 26,000,000 doses of the one this article says is not wise to use, and 5 million for the Pfizer vaccine.
    Well what is true, if the absolute is not known (which I’d say is exactly whats happening , its all a risk) ABOUT ALL VACCINES , WHY ARE WE EVEN TRYING THEM OUT.
    YLC is a retired person news outlet, but gee wiz if you are one of those that cannot read medical books without attracting into your brain, every diseases known to man, then I’d suggest you pick your article that you read, on this news service very carefully.

  4. 1

    I agree that caution is necessary. Australia should not roll out a sub-standard vaccine, when there is no evidence that once you have had this vaccine, it is safe to take a more effective vaccine later, when it becomes available. Australia still has a little time to secure an effective vaccine for all Australians. I don’t see the point in giving us a vaccine that is only 62% effective. Does that mean we would still have 48% chance of coming down with COVID? I also think that many people would opt out of taking this sub-standard vaccine – as the benefit is questionable.

  5. 0

    If the health Minister, Mr Greg Hunt says the chosen vaccines are correct for us why would we question it? Isn’t he the guy that says what’s right for us health wise. No way for me. I will listen to the immunologists etc to know what’s right for me. That’s if we can get our hands on the better one. Can’t trust a politician to tell us the truth about much.



continue reading


Avoid these common mistakes people make with bleach

Bleach is one of the most effective and least expensive disinfectants around, but it pays to remember it's not an...


Concerns over limited data on how vaccine will affect over-65s

There are growing concerns that the vaccine expected to be given to the majority of Australians when the rollout starts...


Making healthy eating more affordable

Eating a healthy diet is crucial to our mental and emotional health as well as our physical wellbeing. It can...


Hands up who's in the club that is wrecking the planet

Alex Baumann, Western Sydney University and Samuel Alexander, University of Melbourne Among the many hard truths exposed by COVID-19 is...


The most iconic handbags of all time

While countless clothing trends have come and gone, certain handbags have remained desirable across the decades, as coveted now as...

Health news

Health check finds Australia is stressed and obese

One quarter (25.6 per cent) of Australians undergoing a health check have been identified as at risk of developing diabetes....

Finance News

Financial planning costly and complicated, say review submissions

A review of the financial advice sector seeking to cut red tape and provide affordable advice could lead to more...


Types of polyps and what to do about them

Polyps are clumps of cells that grow inside your body. While most polyps aren't dangerous, some can develop into cancer....