AWU gets real

THE Australian Workers Union has called for the aluminium ­industry to be exempted from the renewable energy target, a move that will increase pressure on Labor to negotiate a bipartisan deal with the Coalition on changes to the scheme.

AWU national secretary Scott McDine warned that the RET maintained in its current form would lead to thousands of jobs shifting overseas with no ­environmental gain.

The AWU’s aluminium delegates conference will today pass a formal resolution calling for a full exemption from the scheme for the industry and for the deadline for reaching the 41,0000-gigawatt large-scale renewable energy ­target to be pushed out from 2020 to 2022.

The AWU’s call for an exemption for aluminium echoes those from the industry and 25 Coa­lition backbench MPs. The industry estimates the costs of the RET at $80 million a year.

Victorian Liberal MP Dan Tehan, a leader of the Coalition backbench group seeking an exemption for aluminium, said the industry should be excluded because of the risk to jobs.

“It is now beholden on both the government and the opposition in true bipartisanship to ensure that the future of aluminium smelting jobs are not jeopardised by the RET,’’ Mr Tehan said.

5 comments

Labor agrees to talks with government over RET aluminium concessionsTHE AUSTRALIANSEPTEMBER 18, PrintNational Affairs EditorCanberrahttps://plus.google.com/113238264937713210151 LABOR appears open to negotiations with the Coalition on the treatment of aluminium in the renewable energy target as Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane has seized on a union call for a full exemption to demand Labor choose backing workers or the Greens. Mr Macfarlane wrote yesterday to opposition climate spokesman Mark Butler to formally extend an offer to meet to discuss the RET after the Australian Workers Union called for a full exemption for aluminium under the target.

Lead author of the report, company director and former Reserve Bank board member Dick Warburton, says the RET could cost $22 billion in taxpayer-funded subsidies if it continues and the money would be better spent elsewhere.

"You've got a very significant oversupply of electricity into a slowing demand of electricity and there is just no justification for spending this sort of money," he told AM.

"We don't believe that there needs to be a large scale of renewables being made into the market at a time when there is so much supply."

Oh oh oh oh !!!!

NNNNoOOOOoOOiOO!

I feel a greenhouse gas coming on!

I can see the steam coming out of Christine Milne's ears!

Stupid headline..........AWU gets real.

What is that supposed to mean?

5 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment