Lifting of the long white cloud

THE weekend’s stunning election win across the Tasman for the centre-right government shows why the wave of New Zealanders shifting to Australia has become a trickle, and threatens to become a steady stream moving in the ­reverse direction.

New Zealand, said popular Prime Minister John Key during the campaign, is “on the cusp of something very special”.


Through a Saturday of driving rain in most of the country, and despite voting being voluntary, Kiwis gave their safe-hands National Party-dominated administration a bigger majority, for the third consecutive election.

Under Key and his canny ­Finance Minister Bill English — whom the Prime Minister lauded at the victory rally as “the best minister of finance in the developed world” — the party has stabilised the economy, restrained government spending, and delivered a budget surplus.

Last Thursday, it was announced that during the second quarter the economy grew 3.9 per cent on the same period in the previous year, the highest rate for a decade and comfortably ahead of Australia’s 3.1 per cent.

Last year, the net number of New Zealanders moving to ­Australia fell dramatically to 8500, compared with 31,200 the ­previous year.

A fortnight ago, the World Economic Forum’s new index of global competitiveness had Australia moving down a notch to 22nd while NZ rose one to 17th. The NZ unemployment rate fell to 5.6 per cent in the June quarter, while the most recent Australian figure is 6.1 per cent for August.

The top income tax rate is 33 per cent, compared with 45 per cent in Australia; the corporate rate 28 per cent against 30 per cent. The Fiscal Responsibility Act virtually requires parties, even the Greens, to seek surpluses. And English has vowed to set aside $455 million a year for the next three years for tax cuts starting in 2017.

Key, aged 53, grew up in Christchurch public housing with his mother, an Austrian Jewish ­immigrant who worked as a cleaner after his father died when Key was eight.

He was an investment banker who became a member of the foreign exchange committee of the US Federal Reserve, and worked in Singapore, London, Sydney and New York.

His competitor for prime minister was Labour leader David Cunliffe, a former diplomat and business consultant. Although he took over the party chiefly through union backing, he lost ­appeal.

The Greens, in formal alliance for some years with Labour, have male and female co-leaders. The female co-leader is Metiria Turei, and her male co-leader is Russel Norman, who came to NZ when he was aged 30 from Brisbane, where he was involved with the Socialist Workers’ Party, but has in recent years broadened the Greens’ policy base.

Cunliffe’s challenge following such a poor Labour performance — its lowest percentage vote since 1922 — is far greater. The party, says James, has driven itself down the cul-de-sac of identity politics, while its great National Party rival has more quietly and unselfconsciously developed an increasingly diverse caucus, with Maori, Pacific Islanders, a Korean, a Chinese, and two Indians among them.


The Nationals intend to reduce net debt to 20 per cent of GDP, further deregulate the labour market, reduce the barriers to development thrown up by the Resource Management Act, speed infrastructure development, boost the oil and minerals sectors, and improve irrigation for agriculture and horticulture.

Welfare reform will refocus the sector from a conventional “spending” approach to one based on “investment” in skills. Science and research programs will be at the forefront of boosting government investment to 0.8 per cent of GDP. And English intends to deploy a team to scrutinise, review and where needed re-draft legislation, following a 525 page Productivity Commission report.

A quiet program of change is gathering pace, with careful attention to minimise social pain.

The massive win at the weekend for the pragmatic Key means this program will continue largely uninterrupted through the new term and probably for a fourth.

The Abbott government will be watching NZ now with even more envy, wishing that, like Key’s team, it had no Senate to hamstring it.

 

7 comments

I had a brief discussion with Twilla on another thread . That politics not supported by a philosophy is managerial . So becomes who can manage best the current circumstances . Not effect change.
The truth is those conviction politician that are back by a philosophy and effect change are rewarded . The best politics is good policy. Change unfortunately cannot be too radically implemented you must explain and take the voters with you .
Hawke was a master at this and affected major change we still live on today .. So is Keys in New Zealand and so was Maggie.

JOHN Key’s election victory is rich in lessons for the Coalition on how to govern and for Labor on the costs of remaining a wholly owned subsidiary of the unions.

There is plenty in that for Tony Abbott to emulate: even more so as the scale of the National Party’s success is only rivalled by that of Labour’s humiliation.

From the end of World War II to the move to MMP, New Zealand’s Labour Party averaged 44 per cent of the vote; its share has now fallen below 25 per cent, the lowest since it became a serious electoral force in the 1920s. Nor is that surprising: under David Cunliffe, Labour has lurched to the left, promising to “soak the rich”, raise minimum wages and bolster public spending, while intervening in housing, insurance and electricity markets.

Cunliffe’s ill-conceived proposals reflect his masters’ voice. Backed by less than a third of Labour’s partyroom in the 2013 leadership ballot, Cunliffe succeeded thanks to the unions, which gave him 60 per cent of the membership vote and more than 70 per cent of the vote of Labour-affiliated entities.

In exchange, Cunliffe promised to reverse Key’s changes to the IR laws, while initiating a process which would have led to New Zealand emulating Australia’s Fair Work Act.

Long gone, therefore, are the days when Labour, under the impetus of finance minister Roger Douglas, was at the global cutting edge of microeconomic reform, dismantling the interventionism which had slashed New Zealanders’ living standards from the world’s third highest in 1955 to 21st 30 years later.

Unfortunately, NZ’s Labour Party is hardly alone in repudiating its reform legacy. Rather, as their electoral base shrinks, social democratic parties have become increasingly reliant on the unions and especially on those whose fortunes depend on public spending. The result, epitomised by Bill Shorten and Ed Miliband (who rose to the top of Britain’s Labour Party solely thanks to his 60 per cent share of union votes), is a new generation of leaders that brandishes the rhetoric of class warfare to defend existing entitlements, ignoring entirely how those entitlements are to be financed.

So far, however, that approach has earned few dividends. Even in Sweden, where former unionist Stefan Lofven will lead the Social Democrats into a left-wing coalition government, the Social Democratic Party’s vote remains trapped at historic lows, as does the vote of its once powerful German counterpart. Adding Cunliffe’s rout to the list should make the ALP think again.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/theres-much-tony-abbott-could-learn-from-john-keys-triumph-in-nz/story-fn7078da-1227065791798?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+TheAustralianOpinion+%2528The+Australian+%257C+Opinion%2529

Pete,

Everything changes, nothings forever.

I wouldn't get overly excited about it all.

Enjoy your team winning, whoever they may be, they will be out again soon enough.

It be the way of things.

Those of advancing years should remove themselves from political discourse, definitely not good for their health.

Take it easy.

SD

I disagree it has been proven medically that as we age we should remai engaged with our society ..

Some people choose to give up, so e choose to remain active and engage.

It is a shame though for one of advancing years to still buy into the 60's pop culture of transcendental hocus pocus and que sera sera ism 

take it easy lemon squeezy

Pete,

I did say political discourse with a humorous intent.

You remain engaged with your society, it is important you should.

I shall remain engaged with mine.

We are so far apart in virtually all our views of society and life in general I feel there is little point conversing with each other in future.

Take care.

SD

I didn't know we had been ..

I know it is important to be engaged SD that was my point .My "Society" is the world.

Sol no wonder Key has achieved so much he is Jewish.,,

He's also ditching the Union Jack ..replacing it with star of david??

No the Jews would never have a white feather as their flag 

Why do you continue to denigrate the NZ emblem ? It would appear you applaud Key on one hand yet bag his agenda on the other. It cannot be ignorance because I have pointed out its the Silver Fern on numerous posts. I guess its just your snarky nature. Do you have a similar poor attitude to the ANZAC tradition ?

I guess for you WW1 was all about the UK and the ANZACs were a sideshow. Thats your general narrative in the forum , deride aussies and laud the UK. Now it extends to NZ. Poor form.

Spot on Pete

About time we had another

Isaac Issacs, John Monash ....

The old Sheepshaggers are going great guns . Now Keystein has a uncluttered run achieving the impossible in New Zealand of a majority in there own right . He will throw off the last remnants of Socialism and build on his low tax high employment results . When I lived their the socialism was unbelievable. 

As far as the non issue of a flag I think our cousins should be given a choice of a new flag the white feather would be an embarrassment .

Lots of great Maori symbols.

Agree the fern is so "gay"

Need something Macho like the He Tiki or Waka sailing towards Aotearoa

Roughly a million people didn't show up to vote for Saturday's election, making it one of New Zealand's worst turnouts in the last century.

An estimated 77.04 per cent of enrolled voters took part in the election, slightly higher than the 74.2 per cent turnout in 2011, which was the worst in percentage terms since before women got the right to vote in 1893.

This year's result still ranks as the third-worst turnout in the last 100 years, with the number of non-voters almost tallying to the number of votes that went to National.

The estimated results are based on the 2,405,652 votes received before voting closed, which includes nearly 300,000 special votes that are yet to be counted.

Voter turnout has been on a downward slide since the 1960s, when it consistently reached 90 per cent.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10526861/Voter-turnout-near-record-low

 

Even with a low turnout it is still better than a lot of countries. I think the proportional representation sytem has some good points too. Maybe we should try it in the lower house here.

Shows wha happens when voting is voluntary you only get the people that are interested .

Their system of voting is not proportional representation but a complex Quota system . It is dopey .,,

as is ours in both houses worse in the senate.

7 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment