Hildebrand again.

"

IT is a cosmic inevitability that the human race will eventually be wiped out by something or other.

Perhaps we will destroy the planet, perhaps we will be hit by an asteroid, perhaps, if we’re lucky, we will survive long enough to see the sun turn supernova and consume us all.

However it would be a shame if, when humanity shuffles away, the cause of death read simply: “Stupidity.”

Sadly, amid all the sorrow and loss that occurred this week, it appears that even in times of national tragedy stupidity is still very much alive and well.

Indeed, it is an abiding feature of stupidity that it has no off position. In other words, when you’re stupid you’re too stupid to stop being stupid.

And so it is with a heavy heart that I recall some of the responses to the horror that played out in Sydney this week:

The reality: A gunman wearing a jihadist bandanna seizes hostages in Martin Place and forces them to display a jihadist flag.

The police response: Immediately launch a counter-terrorism operation.

The idiot’s response: Immediately launch a debate about whether it should be referred to as “terrorism”.

The reality: The gunman employs a method and symbolism identical to that employed and advocated by Islamic State.

The Telegraph’s response: A special edition of the newspaper saying an Islamic State operative had launched an attack in Sydney.

The idiot’s response: Abuse the newspaper for linking the gunman to Islamic State.

The reality: The gunman is found to have declared himself a follower of Islamic State and demands an official Islamic State flag.

The authorities’ response: Prepare for a potentially deadly outcome.

The idiot’s response: Start a hashtag.

The reality: The gunman executes two hostages.

The community’s response: A massive outpouring of shock and grief.

The idiot’s response: Accuse the media of overreacting.

The reality: The gunman has a history of violent, abusive and delusional behaviour.

The Prime Minister’s response: To say he was mentally unstable.

The idiot’s response: To say the PM is unfairly stigmatising mentally ill people.

There is no doubt all the goodwill in the world within many of these people.

When you feel powerless over things you can’t control you lash out at the things you can.

Like the poor kid who gets bullied at school and then yells at his mum, it’s easier to have a go at the cops, the media, the PM or an imagined racist backlash because that you can deal with.

That, at least, won’t kill you.

Yet we see in these reactions that troubling human instinct to blame everyone when something goes wrong except the actual wrongdoer.

And if there is anything more worrying than evil itself it’s the people who don’t know it when they see it.

Because the really scary thing about the most truly stupid people isn’t that they’re stupid, it’s that they think they’re the smart ones — the righteous few who know the real truth when everyone else is wrong.

Just like the stupid bastard who started all this in the first place."

Link

6 comments

The 99 per cent of Sydney people who are tolerant caring people are expressing their grief and tolerance in a very public way in Martin Place . I have been three times and keep being drawn back . I went with my friend Ike who is Jewish and Ozan who is a Muslim . Though there is no recognisable way you would no this.

When the grief period dies down as it evitibly will questions will be asked by the tolerant majority . 

Questions about our refugee policy .

Questions about our courts .

Questions about use of legal aid. 

This man was funded by taxpayers to take his case to the high court on writing letters to dead soldiers families the week before his rampage he lost . 

Gemma I support everything you have written ..

 

I also like Joe BTW

Australian government exploits Sydney siege to advance “war on terror”By Peter Symonds
19 December 2014

In the wake of Monday’s hostage standoff in a central Sydney cafe, the entire Australian media and political establishment has backed the federal government’s announcement of a “review” in order to justify a raft of draconian new measures. From the very outset, the incident has been seized on to advance the reactionary agenda behind the “war on terror”—support for US military operations abroad and deeper attacks on fundamental democratic rights at home.

Prime Minister Tony Abbott set the stage for the review at a press conference on Tuesday afternoon. Having lavished praise on the “professionalism” and “commitment” of the security apparatus during the 16-hour siege, he focussed attention on the hostage-taker Man Haron Monis by querying why he was not on “appropriate watch lists” and how he could be “entirely at large in the community.”

Abbott’s remarks sought to divert public attention from the government’s own role in manufacturing a national “terrorism” crisis—under conditions of shock and horror produced by the police shootout in the early hours of Tuesday. Having been deliberately kept in the dark throughout Monday by the government and the media, the population awoke to find that Monis and two innocent hostages—Katrina Dawson, 38, a barrister and mother of three, and the cafe manager Tori Johnson, 34—were dead.

As of today, neither the Abbott government nor the New South Wales (NSW) state authorities has provided any official explanation for, or account of, the police storming of the Lindt cafe. None of the many questions surrounding the decision to activate the entire counter-terrorism apparatus on Monday have been answered. Instead, following his “query” on Tuesday, Abbott announced a joint review with the NSW government on Wednesday.

The political purpose of the “review” is evident from its narrow terms of reference, directed at Monis, a mentally unstable Iranian refugee who was on bail on allegations of sexual assault and being an accessory to murder. By implication, Monis should not have been allowed into Australia, granted refugee status, unemployment benefits, legal aid or bail, and, if not in jail, should have been under constant police surveillance.

Abbott’s claim that Monis was not closely watched by the police and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) is absurd. Monis came to national attention when he was charged in 2007 with sending “offensive” letters to the families of Australian soldiers killed in Afghanistan. He staged many individual protests about his treatment at the hands of the police and ASIO.

Counter-terrorism expert Greg Barton told the Sydney Morning Herald there was no such thing as a single watch list but rather “concentric circles” of monitoring and surveillance, depending on priorities. On Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio, Attorney-General George Brandis said: “I think we need to be careful with this word ‘watch list’ because ... there are various levels of investigation or scrutiny that ASIO conducts.”

Abbott’s aim in setting up the review is to stoke every possible right-wing anti-refugee, anti-welfare and law-and order issue. In a 2GB interview with radio shock-jock Ray Hadley, Abbott said he was “incredulous and exasperated” that Monis was “on our streets.” The purpose of the review, above all, is to stir up fears about further terrorist attacks to justify the ramping up of the “war on terror.”

Following Australia’s largest-ever anti-terror police raids, on homes in Sydney and Brisbane, in September, ASIO Director General David Irvine declared that he was particularly concerned about “the so-called ‘lone wolf’ or ‘stand-alone’ groups who act independently and throw off few clues as to malicious intent.” Amid a growing drum-beat in the media about the danger of a “lone wolf” attack, the Sydney siege was made to order, to justify further repressive measures to overturn basic democratic rights and beef up the security apparatus.

After all, if every individual who “throws off few clues” is now to come within the scope of ASIO, this is the recipe for a police state. That is already well underway, with the massive expansion of ASIO and its powers over the past decade. This year the Abbott government has pushed through three new tranches of anti-terror laws, with the support of the opposition parties, and will undoubtedly use the Sydney siege to ram through the fourth, involving the compulsory retention of the Internet “meta-data” for the entire population.

All the opposition parties and the media immediately fell into line with the government’s review. Opposition Labor leader Bill Shorten told Fairfax Media: “There are clearly questions about this horrific tragedy that need to be answered.” Far from questioning the review’s terms of reference and aims, he called for it “to be open and unrestricted [and] the findings must be made public.”

Acting Greens Leader Adam Bandt, who has been full of praise for the police and security agencies from the start, endorsed the review, adding a proposal to examine the adequacy of gun control laws. Like the Labor Party, he stressed complete bipartisanship on the response to the Sydney siege, declaring: “It is critical that the nation comes together.”

It goes without saying that the Murdoch media and tabloids are fully on board, but the same is true of the so-called liberal press. A Sydney Morning Herald editorial yesterday declared that “Abbott was right to call an urgent federal-state investigation into whether systemic failures in police, security, justice and even gun control systems allowed the deranged and violent Man Haron Momis to walk freely among us.”

The editorial railed against the decision to grant Monis bail and called for a review of “the surveillance regime and intelligence sharing.” While cautioning against a rush to judgment, it declared: “The logical next step would be to jail the likes of Monis indefinitely before they can act out their sick plans.” The newspaper did not rule out such a step, but simply noted that it “opens a whole new debate about how far society will accept limits to hard-won freedoms of association and expression.”

This extraordinary statement is testimony to the lack of any constituency in ruling circles for the defence of essential democratic rights. Throughout the past week, there has been complete unanimity among parliamentary parties. During the siege, every media outlet functioned as an arm of the state apparatus, taking orders from the police and security officials about what could be published, probing nothing and criticising nothing. In its aftermath, they have continued to ask none of the essential questions.

Above all, the Abbott government’s review seeks to deflect attention from the central question that must be posed: why was a terrible, but relatively straightforward, police matter elevated to the status of a national emergency involving the entire security apparatus? The political purpose of that decision, like the review, is to inflate the “war on terror” in preparation for greater Australian commitment to US-led conflicts and a deepening assault on the social and democratic rights of the working class.

 

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/12/19/sieg-d19.html

Fair comment by Joe.

Don't you realise "Joe" was talking about you ..and your ridiculouse "I'll ride with you" 

bs joe was talking about you and your pretend grieving. LMAO

"The community’s response: A massive outpouring of shock and grief."

There's a good intellect behind the clown facade.

Just to qualify Gemma is talking about Joe not Gerry.,

Thanks Pete...forgot to say I was referring to Joe.

Of course how true is the closing statement which we see over and over ...

"the really scary thing about the most truly stupid people isn’t that they’re stupid, it’s that they think they’re the smart ones
— the righteous few who know the real truth when everyone else is wrong."   Emoji

ABC Fairfax PC correct ones .,,

Sol this is what I am talking about ..the siege is still on and PC orrect Gerry says oh let's protect the Muslims. What the f..would some guy in the backwoods of Queensland know about us in Sydney..

as soon as Gemma says what a crock what do we get oh yeah me too .,

So I say if the Muslims in Israel are not afraid t ride a bus why are Sydney Muslims . What do you get as a reply cave man says why talk about Israel .,Jeezus  sorry .,

try and get help peetee

Any capacity to THINK Gayrie?

Muslims in Israel can ride a bus without being threatened...

Afraid to even try to switch h on those brain cells?v?

popsoleye, I think you should try and help peeeeteeeey , he has flipped.

Yeah yeah me too. Fair comment Gayrie.

So true mate. I'll ride with you, no worries.

Lets plant some mangos

               Image result for mistletoe

 

          Image result for mistletoe

          

6 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment