Hillary wants War

can you imagine russia building a ballistic missile system in canada, next to their border with the USA? and another line of war missile installations along the USA border in Mexico?

 

this is what N.A.T.O. and its owner the USA has been doing to russia.

 

as well, the american government, mainstream media and hillary have been increasing their hate propaganda against russia, with no justification at all.

 

and why is hillary, who has much experience in politics and international affairs, so silent on these developments as well as the vital issues of environment, economy, overpopulation, overpollution, poverty in the USA, their crumbling infrastructure and growing unemployment?

 

hellary (not a spelling mistake) and her owners are interested only in the expansion of the american empire and their own enrichment.

 

“Perhaps the key factor has been NATO's expansion right up to Russia's doorstep, absorbing much of Eastern Europe and even the three Baltic states (formerly part of the Soviet Union).

Another factor is US deployment of a ballistic missile defence system in Romania, soon to be followed by a similar deployment in Poland. Russia has denounced these policies as a threat to its security and part of a new American containment strategy.”

wake up folks, and see what is happening around you.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-26/the-election-of-hillary-clinton-promises-a-more-dangerous-world/7966336



 

2 comments

and another good article from our own independent journalist, john pilger.   his explanation will help you understand what is really going on beyond the lies of mainstream media.

http://johnpilger.com/articles/inside-the-invisible-government-war-propaganda-clinton-trump

Hillary's certainly not a pacifist. She represents a continuation of America's policy of using Russia as the perpetual enemy so the administartion can claim to be protecting its citizens against it.

Sadly, it works.

The problem is that while Hillary is predicatable, the alternative, Trump isn't. He takes pride in an impetuous who-will-I-hate-today approach to life. Pretty safe while he has no military power, but it terrifies me that, if elected, he will have access to the world's biggest nuclear arsenal.

Both of them scare me. I wish America could do better.

i agree barak.  if i were an american citizen, i would vote for jill stein, the green's candidate.

our corrupt mainstream media, including the ABC, make no mention of this important candidate, or any others, as far as i can see.

Loath Trump and Hellary she is a war monger  and an evil woman -- love John Pillager he is a wonderful journalist,  the very best!

 

kika - a big difference between the US and us is that they have first-past-the-post voting, without any preferential form of vote distribution. This means that whoever gets the most "primary" votes (there are no other kinds) gets elected. Therefore the only candidates with any chance at all are those nominated by the Republicans and the Democrats.

If you vote for the Green candidate, you might be sending a message, but there is simply no way your choice can win. So, very little coverage.

Kika

Actually the American News do not mention the Green Party either.

We should have the first past the post elections here .. it would stop the corrupt wheeling and dealing that goes on within our politics.

No, it woiuld just replace one version of corrupt wheeling and dealing with another version of corrupt wheeling and dealing.

2 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment