Climate change may have caused COVID to occur



Global greenhouse gas emissions over the last century have made southern China a hotspot for bat-borne coronaviruses, by driving growth of forest habitat favoured by bats.

A new study  provides the first evidence of a mechanism by which climate change could have played a direct role in the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic.

The study has revealed large-scale changes in the type of vegetation in the southern Chinese Yunnan province, and adjacent regions in Myanmar and Laos, over the last century.

Climatic changes including increases in temperature, sunlight, and atmospheric carbon dioxide - which affect the growth of plants and trees - have changed natural habitats from tropical shrubland to tropical savannah and deciduous woodland. This created a suitable environment for many bat species that predominantly live in forests.

The number of coronaviruses in an area is closely linked to the number of different bat species present.

The study found that an additional 40 bat species have moved into the southern Chinese Yunnan province in the past century, harbouring around 100 more types of bat-borne coronavirus. This 'global hotspot' is the region where genetic data suggests SARS-CoV-2 may have arisen.

“Climate change over the last century has made the habitat in the southern Chinese Yunnan province suitable for more bat species,” said Dr Robert Beyer, a researcher in the University of Cambridge’s Department of Zoology and first author of the study.

“Understanding how the global distribution of bat species has shifted as a result of climate change may be an important step in reconstructing the origin of the COVID-19 outbreak.”

To get their results, the researchers created a map of the world’s vegetation as it was a century ago, using records of temperature, precipitation, and cloud cover. Then they used information on the vegetation requirements of the world’s bat species to work out the global distribution of each species in the early 1900s.

Comparing this to current distributions allowed them to see how bat ‘species richness’, the number of different species, has changed across the globe over the last century due to climate change.

“As climate change altered habitats, species left some areas and moved into others - taking their viruses with them. This not only altered the regions where viruses are present, but most likely allowed for new interactions between animals and viruses, causing more harmful viruses to be transmitted or evolve,” said Dr Beyer.

The world’s bat population carries around 3000 different types of coronavirus, with each bat species harbouring an average of 2.7 coronaviruses - most without showing symptoms.

An increase in the number of bat species in a particular region, driven by climate change, may increase the likelihood that a coronavirus harmful to humans is present, transmitted, or evolves there.

Most coronaviruses carried by bats cannot jump into humans. But several coronaviruses known to infect humans are very likely to have originated in bats, including three that can cause human fatalities: Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) CoV, and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) CoV-1 and CoV-2.

The region identified by the study as a hotspot for a climate-driven increase in bat species richness is also home to pangolins, which are suggested to have acted as intermediate hosts to SARS-CoV-2.

The virus is likely to have jumped from bats to these animals, which were then sold at a wildlife market in Wuhan - where the initial human outbreak occurred.

The researchers echo calls from previous studies that urge policy-makers to acknowledge the role of climate change in outbreaks of viral diseases, and to address climate change as part of COVID-19 economic recovery programs.

“The COVID-19 pandemic has caused tremendous social and economic damage. Governments must seize the opportunity to reduce health risks from infectious diseases by taking decisive action to mitigate climate change,” said Professor Andrea Manica in the University of Cambridge’s Department of Zoology, who was involved in the study.

The researchers emphasised the need to limit the expansion of urban areas, farmland, and hunting grounds into natural habitat to reduce contact between humans and disease-carrying animals.

The study showed that over the last century, climate change has also driven increases in the number of bat species in regions around Central Africa, and scattered patches in Central and South America.

Do you think climate change is to blame for the COVID-19 pandemic? Do you think we will see more dangerous pandemics because of the failure to address climate change?

9 comments

"Suggestions", supposition and straw grabbing hysteria!

Stop eating the filthy things and seriously reduce their numbers and stop the Labs playing their deadly games!

As for "Climate Change" - climate will change and humans will not halt that change as it is a natural progression that has occurred for millenia and will continue to do so - with or without us or the stinking bats!

"Do you think climate change is to blame for the COVID-19 pandemic? Do
you think we will see more dangerous pandemics because of the failure to
address climate change?"

Reading the study on which this article is based doesn't convince me that climate change is to blame for the COVID-19 pandemic. The study is inconclusive although it advances a lot of theories. Some of the theories are "bats are the likely zoonotic origin of several coronaviruses", "the number of CoVs present in an area is strongly correlated with local bat species richness", "this region coincides with the likely spatial origin of bat-borne ancestors of SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2" and "climate
change may have played a key role in the evolution or transmission of
the two SARS CoVs. Note the highlighted words which are merely indications, not a strong definition. What has been omitted is that bats, such as flying foxes, move when an area is no longer available so the movement of bats can also be attributed to forest decimation. The question as to the future possible pandemics is hypothetical because it assumes that man can alter climate change.

Climate change is real, of that there is no doubt. Geologists have proven that Earth's climate has changed over millennia from studies of rock formations and also that those changes are, to some degree, cyclical. What man has done in the last period may not be helpful to the climate but the effect has been minimal when compared with what Nature is doing. Whilst much has been said about climate change in recent times, there have been no definite examples of what man can do to stop climate change. We have been told that "something" must be done and possibilities are stopping the use of plastics, stop burning fossil fuels, produce electricity from renewables, reduce the nation's herd and ban fossil fuel powered vehicles.

Scientists rely on sponsorship to continue studies so it could be argued that promoting theories on climate change can attract funding. Politicians change with the wind and the flavour of the month is climate change so they can see votes if they jump on the bandwagon. I recall that in the '60's that we were warned about the impending Ice Age, then we had the hole in the ozone layer followed by global warming that was the greatest moral challenge of our time until the temperature stabilised and was then renamed climate change. If I can be shown, beyond doubt, that man can alter climate change then I will become a zealot in support of any hare-brained scheme that is proposed but until then I will remain a sceptic.


I may be an 'oldie' but I've questioned a number of times without response; Does anyone believe as I do that most if not all the climate change have come about since we have polluted the atmosphere with junk from space crafts

I've seen pictorial's on the internet showing the earth surrounded by junk from used rockets etc.

No Bridget, bats are not filthy things they are important to the ecology, humans are the filthy ones and stop blaming the bats!

No, climate change is not responsible for covid-19. Human beings are. The environment does not wittingly and deliberately spread disease. Only humans do.

So Ben, you are saying that COVID-19 is being willingly and deliberately spread by humans?

Why for God's sake?

climate change is also causing the tundra perma frost to melt which potentially has bacteria microbes & diseases that have been frozen for a million years

QUOTE: "Do you think climate change is to blame for the COVID-19 pandemic? Do you think we will see more dangerous pandemics because of the failure to address climate change?"


That's a definite NO and NO!

Those "researchers" are drawing a very long bow!

Bats,pangolins,markets,Wuhan...perhaps WHO team will clarify.

Sick miners in a cave, Wuhan lab researchers look for cause, poor lab security, virus escapes, slack CCP international travel precautions, sick world.. perhaps Ping will apologise for pong he allows to spread.

In the meantime a realistic analysis of role of CO2 in climate change shows CO2 is not the IPCC magnitude culprit.(John Nicol). So even CCP's role as major polluter is not a driver of Covid.

9 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment