Life-like baby program backfires

Reverse psychology is often used to help people get their own way but when it comes to teenage girls and babies, a study proves nothing can beat the maternal instinct.

In WA, 3000 teenage schoolgirls took part in a program between 2003 and 2006, in which they cared for robot babies. The hope was that they would be put off a teenage pregnancy. However, the program hasn't quite gone to plan, with a study, published in The Lancet, finding that teenage pregnancies actually increased as a result.

The Virtual Infant Program (VIP), which is still widely used overseas, saw half the girls given a robot baby, reflective of the behaviours of a six-week-old to care for over the weekend, while the other half received standard health education. The girls were tracked until they were 20 and the study has revealed that 17 per cent who had the robot babies to care for went on to have teenage pregnancies, while only 11 per cent of the health education group fell pregnant.

Of the group who cared for the robot babies, fewer went on to have abortions as a result of their pregnancies – 53.8 per cent compared to 60.1 in the other group.

The program was stopped in 2007 when initial findings suggested it wasn’t working – it seems the girls with the robot babies enjoyed the attention of family and friends.

 

5 comments

Seems logical to me.

Yes Barak, perfectly logical. "Thank heaven for little girls for little girls get bigger every day, thank heaven for little girls they grow up in the most delightful way". Once the sweet bird of youth has flown the roost all that's left is guano.

In view of the costs involved raising a child .. should the WA Government be obliged to pay these costs to the girls they used in their failed experiment that fell pregnant

Governments get a lot of things wrong. How many can they be sued for?

Actually, remembering back to an earlier stage of my life, did you know that you can't sue the Weather Bureau for a faulty weather forecast?

Is School Safe another experimental Programme used on todlers and children ?

No.

Cannot understand how

A four-year-old child in NSW is transitioning their gender before their first day of preschool as new data shows a steep climb in the number of children with gender dysphoria
Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/health/2016/09/01/02/52/four-year-old-child-youngest-nsw-transitioning-gender-preschool-safe-schools#vq46151j2z83VTLB.99

In Melbourne there is apparently a 3 year old ...
It would seem to me these children are too young for a life time decision like that and it is nothing but experimental.

Abby -  I read that article in the paper about the four year old transitioning their gender before their first day of preschool. When my grandson went to preschool, the toilets were all the same for girls and boys,nobody had to use seperate toilets. When my boys were 3 and 4 years old they wouldn't even know the difference between the two sexes. My friends grandson loved to dress up in his sister's fairy clothes, that didn't mean he wanted to be a girl, he is now 10 years old and a normal little boy who loves to play trains and footy.. 

Cannot understand why parents would agree to these experiments ????

5 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment