US company owns the naming rights to an Australian landmark

bondi beach

The council that oversees Bondi Beach has called on US retailer Abercrombie & Fitch to relinquish the naming rights to Australia’s favourite beach.

The international fashion giant is the official, registered owner of the Bondi Beach trademark in the US.

Abercrombie & Fitch doesn’t have any Australian stores anymore, it still owns the naming rights to Bondi Beach, which prevents Australian companies such as Bondi Wash from applying a trademark for its products in the US.

Waverley Council Mayor Sally Betts will contact Federal Trade Minister Steven Ciobo to see if he can fix this situation.

“It’s an Australian beach so I don’t believe anyone in another country or another country should be able to trademark it.

“I’m assuming in Australia we are not allowed to trademark New York.

“It’s disappointing because people who run a business in Bondi and have a wonderful product they want to sell in the US, are unable to trademark their own product.”

“I think it’s problematic for any of our locations to be trademarked overseas,” said Mayor Betts.

“When you think of the value, especially the economic value of Bondi Beach, it’s enormous.”

Do you think it’s right that overseas companies can trademark Australian landmarks?

FirstPrev12(page 2/2)
18 comments

Rae,

It would appear anythings for sale these days. Heritage or not.

SD

Bloody yanks, not so long ago it was Uhg Boots, they think they can buy anything, good thing you can't buy class, no matter how much money you have.

Australians should go to the USA and play them at their own game!

Find things in the US that are not tradmarked and register them here in Oz. 

LOL

Wonder if the Bald Eagle has a trademark.  I could just see an Australian trademarking that bird...LOL

What about something like the Grizzly Bear?  

 

Image result for Grizzling bear

 

I  see nothing wrong with naming rights between countries since we now operate on an international scale. But, Abercrombie and Fitch have no shops in Australia now as far as I understand and should therefore be made to relinquish those rights.

Other iconic place names that have been trademarked in the US include Uluru, which is registered to a carpet company, and Kakadu, which is registered to a cosmetics company that uses Australian native Kakadu plums in its products.

I wonder if the yanks own Canberra? I'm happy to give that away.

And those in Parliament as an extra Robi -- I would say good riddance

FirstPrev12(page 2/2)
18 comments



To make a comment, please register or login

Preview your comment